Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 15

< October 14	October 16 >

October 15

Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Qualified Teams table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Qualified Teams table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary duplication of information that is already available on any article which would possibly transclude this template. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 23:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOR. FIFA does not rank the UEFA qualified teams by their qualifying result; only the second-placed teams to determine play-off teams. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. For the same reason as Jkudlick. Centaur271188 (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. Giant Snowman 18:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and above !votes. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Collective entity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 23. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Collective_entity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Icelandic political colours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Icelandic political colours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should be superseded by associated color templates (e.g. {{Bright Future (Iceland)/meta/color}}) Mélencron (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 19:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lyo-Merly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lyo-Merly (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and ancient Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lists of Danish architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lists of Danish architects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, all redlinks, unlikely to turn blue Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, the table of contents in List of Danish architects already links to the subsections of the list article. Frietjes (talk) 15:03, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ipigott might remember what we did with it but we were planning on creating detailed tabled lists of Danish architects and that was why it was created.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can see, the list is sufficient.--Ipigott (talk) 16:08, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. It appears there was some confusion with the commons copy of this template (which is used) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: to this template are linked so many maps. Please see the grid on the picture, and click to each one of it. The template is used. Regards, ––Silenzio76 (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: This proposal is a mistake. The template is used in many maps. See what Silenzio76 specified above. --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Possible unnecessary duplicate of c:Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 18:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, Silenzio76 and Accipiter Q. Gentilis should explain the lack of links shown in Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72 and that this template is not c:Template:BanatJosephinischeLandaufnahme,1769-72, which has many transclusions and is not the template being discussed here. Frietjes (talk) 14:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NSFIL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NSFIL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused since 2007, doesn't appear to be a valid license Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Music genre infobox request

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Music genre infobox request (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no proof that it ever was. So unlikely to happen. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, Category:Music genre articles without infoboxes is empty, so it looks like all genres have infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Military districts of Sweden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 23. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Military_districts_of_Sweden (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ball family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ball family (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:NAVBOX #4 & 5: "4. There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template." and "5. If not for the navigation template, an editor would be inclined to link many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles." There is no Ball family, unlike Template:Kennedy family with Kennedy family. The family member bios already list all the other family members, and likewise with their TV show listing all the family and visa versa. Therefore, there isn't a bunch of "See also"'s being saved. The other articles are a WP:COATRACK; Chino Hills High School doesn't need a link to a song about a former student, nor a bloated navbox about the goings-on of past enrollees. —Bagumba (talk) 08:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not noteworthy at this time. Let’s see if the younger Ball kids achieve any fame. Right now this “phenomenon” is only driven by the father’s mouth. Rikster2 (talk) 12:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not enough there yet. Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remain neutral on the matter. While I do understand the concerns, at the same time, if the Ball boys do perform well in their professional careers moving forward, it can be a bit handy to have. That can be double the case in terms of something like a rap career for Lonzo, somewhat similar to that of Shaquille O'Neal or even Damian Lillard. Regardless, I would also have to note that LiAngelo Ball should have his own proper article about him by this point in time, especially since college basketball's going to begin, and there's likely interest in UCLA based off of Ball alone. – AGreatPhoenixSunsFan (talk) 23:56, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LugeAt2018WinterOlympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:LugeAt2018WinterOlympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, all redlinks, WP:CRYSTAL Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - The first exception in WP:CRYSTAL is exactly this case... --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Passes WP:CRYSTAL as a scheduled high-visibility event. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 03:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
keep, if this isn't used in three months, please renominate it, but deleting it now would be pointless. Frietjes (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Locomotives and rolling stock of privately-owned railways in Victoria, Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per G7. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Locomotives and rolling stock of privately-owned railways in Victoria, Australia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, almost all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me. Was superseded by this one: Template:Locomotives and rolling stock of the Victorian Railways, predecessors and successors Anothersignalman (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of major urban areas in Alappuzha district

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of major urban areas in Alappuzha district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, outdated Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, this basically duplicates Alappuzha district#Municipalities and Administration of Alappuzha district#Municipalities (and why we need two articles with almost the same content is beyond me). Frietjes (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of Middle powers by date

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:List of Middle powers by date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ligi Ndogo S.C. squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ligi Ndogo S.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Legenda dos resultados de F1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Legenda dos resultados de F1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, not in english Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL HAW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL HAW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another orphaned template which isn't required and I don't see any foreseeable use of this template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've seen this template used on several AFL box score templates. It follows the standard format with other teams in those box scores. South Nashua (talk) 00:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom – unused and unlikely to be used. Duplicate of {{AFL Haw}}, if worse comes to worse then just redirect to aforementioned template. Flickerd (talk) 10:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 04:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, duplicate as explained above. Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL FOOT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL FOOT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphan template that is not required at all and I don't see any foreseeable use of this template. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've seen this template used on several AFL box score templates. It follows the standard format with other teams in those box scores. South Nashua (talk) 00:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom – unused and unlikely to be used. Duplicate of {{AFL Foo}}, if worse comes to worse then just redirect to aforementioned template. Flickerd (talk) 10:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, duplicate as explained above. Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Itawamba County, Mississippi image map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Itawamba County, Mississippi image map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Small obscure county, unlikely to need a map Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User 2017 wildfire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus wrong venue Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:08, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User 2017 wildfire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unrelated to editorial collaboration; we would end up with thousands of userboxes like this if we permitted people to create generate them for every newsworthy event, or every personal or professional challenge. This could perhaps be userspaced, though. The name doesn't really make any sense, though; there has been more than one wildfire in 2017. We hardly need to have a location-and-date version of this for every wildfire since the start of wikipedia, so I think the proper TfD result is delete. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 03:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SMcCandlish, userboxes are discussed at WP:MFD per the instructions here at WP:TFD. Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
procedural keep, wrong venue. Frietjes (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 elections in Germany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Cyp (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 elections in Germany (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, WP:NENAN, WP:CRYSTAL Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intended to create an article on both future elections but agree that it's premature since neither has date yet officially set. I'll G7 Mélencron (talk) 04:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1960 Skyline Conference football standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1960 Skyline Conference football standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, single use, subst if needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. No longer unused. Cbl62 (talk) 23:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Actually, there appear to be two identical templates with different names. Compare the standings template at 1960 Wyoming Cowboys football team. Whichever one is correctly named should be kept; the other should be delete. Cbl62 (talk) 23:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as duplicate of the pre-existing Template:1960 MSC football standings. Jweiss11 (talk) 15:51, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).