Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 23

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. The consensus is that this information, in some form, should be on Wikipedia. Whether this is in its current incarnation, as a navbox, or as a labelled section transclusion, is outside the scope of this TFD. If the last option is chosen (after discussion) then this template may be G6'd without issue. Primefac (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Created by a user who is now blocked. And I don't think remake maps like this must even exist. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think the template should be maintained as it is, it best serves the purpose in the present form.--Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 10:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Newtype Anime Award - Best Television. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not a notable award to be navigating by Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not a notable award? Newtype Award is just like the Animage Award. DarkFallenAngel (talk) 13:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 November 1. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the map was removed from the article here, so this map is now unused. it should either be added back to the article, or deleted. Frietjes (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Bogus keep argument. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only one use, not likely to be used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 19:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Move proposal(s) may be floated at t/p. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, almost all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Politics of Taiwan. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Politics of the Republic of China with Template:Politics of Taiwan.
I think one template for Taiwanese politics is enough and its consistent with WP:COMMONNAME. Wrestlingring (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After merging most of the listed pages to Glossary of policy debate terms, there is no need for this template. I have already removed it from the two remaining pages it was included on. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 NPSL Midwest Region - XX Conference season results

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

these are all unused and mostly incomplete. if we need the head-to-head results, we can add this information to the various season table templates already in the parent article (preferably using Module:Sports table). Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:45, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only used directly in Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Nav. Substitute or replace. Jc86035 (talk) 10:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Jc86035 (talk) 10:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Jc86035 (talk) 10:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).