Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 3
April 3
[edit]S-line/BTS_left/Baering
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:21, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:S-line/BTS_left/Bearing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:S-line/BTS_left/Baering (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused rail succession templates for Bangkok Skytrain Matthewmayer (talk) 15:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:NCAA Division III Women's Soccer Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:NCAA Division III Men's Soccer Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:NCAA Division II Women's Soccer Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Feel free to recreate if any articles are written. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
ZERO (0) articles... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 01:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Weak delete since there are no articles. Quidster4040 (talk) 04:39, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not enough active links (not redirects) to provide useful navigation between articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:12, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep articles in development + some are active links - so not sure what Zero (0) means here. Hmlarson (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Hmlarson: 0 means the navbox isn't used in any articles. The redirects are there because the soccer programs don't have articles and likely won't for an unknown time. There is no use in keeping this navbox if it isn't included in any articles. It defeats the purpose of having a navbox. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- "likely won't for an unknown time" - really? Hmlarson (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- They most likely won't be created or expanded for a while, so yes, really. Who knows when they will be created with content that establishes their notability. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 17:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- "likely won't for an unknown time" - really? Hmlarson (talk) 16:53, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Hmlarson: 0 means the navbox isn't used in any articles. The redirects are there because the soccer programs don't have articles and likely won't for an unknown time. There is no use in keeping this navbox if it isn't included in any articles. It defeats the purpose of having a navbox. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
As a list of television presenters, it fails WP:PERFNAV. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- That link that you provided, mind you lists not only the so-called "negatives", but also the advantages. So in this regard, your respective opinion/argument is a case of "to each his own". BornonJune8 (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
"Avoid adding performances of entertainers into the navboxes for the productions that they appeared in, or crew members into navboxes for the productions they worked on. This includes, but is not limited to actors/actresses, comedians, televison/radio presenters, writers, composers, etc."
--Rob Sinden (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)- You still didn't answer or take for account for the "advantages" as if there's only one perspective to take or agree with. BornonJune8 (talk) 23:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- That link that you provided, mind you lists not only the so-called "negatives", but also the advantages. So in this regard, your respective opinion/argument is a case of "to each his own". BornonJune8 (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- delete, tangential association, and we have List of World Series broadcasters if anyone wants to navigate between the articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
As a list of television presenters, it fails WP:PERFNAV. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please give a better, more thorough, or more proper explanation for how exactly "it fails"!? BornonJune8 (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
"Avoid adding performances of entertainers into the navboxes for the productions that they appeared in, or crew members into navboxes for the productions they worked on. This includes, but is not limited to actors/actresses, comedians, televison/radio presenters, writers, composers, etc."
--Rob Sinden (talk) 16:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please give a better, more thorough, or more proper explanation for how exactly "it fails"!? BornonJune8 (talk) 09:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lizard (talk) 16:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- How exactly is a sports announcer/broadcaster an "entertainer" like an actor or musician!? They technically, aren't giving a "performance" in a broad or narrow minded-sense but reporting, narrating and describing what is happening live during and before and after said sporting event. It isn't like say, a template for one particular motion picture or scripted, episodic television series. It's really no different than a newscaster/broadcast journalist. BornonJune8 (talk), 22:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- They are presenting a TV program, the same way a presenter of, say, a reality TV series is... --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- So your pretty much equating in the simplest, non-descriptive of terms a play-by-play commentator like Al Michaels, Joe Buck or Jim Nantz in the United States to somebody like Ryan Seacrest!? BornonJune8 (talk), 01:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter how in-depth the coverage is, they are still a crew member on a television program. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- And if you therefore, want to play a game of "slippery slope" then why not also get rid of templates devoted for hosts of major televised award shows like the Academy Awards, Grammy Awards, Emmy Awards, and Tony Awards for instance (or any other sort of "middle man" for a widely watched annual event)? BornonJune8 (talk), 22:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, the awards host templates should be deleted. --Rob Sinden (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- And if you therefore, want to play a game of "slippery slope" then why not also get rid of templates devoted for hosts of major televised award shows like the Academy Awards, Grammy Awards, Emmy Awards, and Tony Awards for instance (or any other sort of "middle man" for a widely watched annual event)? BornonJune8 (talk), 22:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter how in-depth the coverage is, they are still a crew member on a television program. --Rob Sinden (talk) 11:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- So your pretty much equating in the simplest, non-descriptive of terms a play-by-play commentator like Al Michaels, Joe Buck or Jim Nantz in the United States to somebody like Ryan Seacrest!? BornonJune8 (talk), 01:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- They are presenting a TV program, the same way a presenter of, say, a reality TV series is... --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:35, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- How exactly is a sports announcer/broadcaster an "entertainer" like an actor or musician!? They technically, aren't giving a "performance" in a broad or narrow minded-sense but reporting, narrating and describing what is happening live during and before and after said sporting event. It isn't like say, a template for one particular motion picture or scripted, episodic television series. It's really no different than a newscaster/broadcast journalist. BornonJune8 (talk), 22:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- delete, tangential association, and we have List of Super Bowl broadcasters for navigating if anyone really wants to do so. Frietjes (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 April 11 ~ Rob13Talk 05:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Test (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete as likely a misrepresentation of copyright status. Note that in many countries, a release saying "this is public domain" is legally meaningless. We'd need evidence that this was released under an actual public domain like free license for this to be suitable for incorporating text into Wikipedia ~ Rob13Talk 05:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Template:TES-in (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I see no evidence on the article page "Tatar Encyclopedia" that text from the Tatar Encyclopaedia is in the public domain. If someone can show evidence that it is in the public domain or a copyleft licence then the template can to be kept. -- PBS (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:42, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).