Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 September 16
September 16
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 11:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
3-link navbox fails the soft requirement for WP:NENAN. Articles are all well-linked without need for a template. Izno (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Four links is more reasonable than five as the threshold but three is too few. Perhaps this can fit in a parent (developer) navbox. czar 04:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough links to provide useful navigation. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 11:15, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:10, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom. --Izno (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- Template:ROLT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template is a redundant and duplicate of Template:Uw-tdel1. I was going for WP:T3 for the first time, but this template seems sort of "humorous", so that's why I open this discussion for better conesus. NgYShung huh? 14:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @NgYShung: Oh sorry! Actually I made it as a sort of "merger" between Template:Uw-tdel1 and Template:Uw-speedy1... Sorry; I didn't know it was against the rules :P forgive me! Am new to templates~ Cheerio, if it's wrong delete it ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 14:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Target360YT: H:T and WP:TMP would help. Cheers! NgYShung huh? 14:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @NgYShung: Haha oops sry :P ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 14:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Target360YT: H:T and WP:TMP would help. Cheers! NgYShung huh? 14:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per the nom and as an experiment. --Izno (talk) 16:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:39, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete pernom and WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete pernom and WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 16:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Vanjagenije (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Can this be moved somewhere? The tag is like an article. Marvellous Spider-Man 05:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't really think this template could go somewhere. NgYShung huh? 14:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Affirmative; Delete. As per @NgYShung: it isn't qualified as anything "wiki-like"... Maybe #Divergent? Neither a template nor an article... ∞😃 Target360YT 😃∞ (talk · contribs) 14:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- delete, the content is already in Stafford Sri Lankan School Doha, this was obviously created by mistake. Frietjes (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete this is an obvious error. It is not a template but an article which has been created elsewhere.Dan arndt (talk) 07:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).