Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge both anime templates together and separately merge {{Video game release}} into {{Video game release new}}. The result should be one template for anime and one template for video games, not one combined template, to be clear. There's clear support for consolidating these templates within each individual topic area, but there's no consensus for merging beyond that. It makes sense to start consolidating and then, if necessary, revisit. Taking this first step will make it easier to compare only two templates in any future discussions about a merge, rather than trying to cross-reference between four distinct templates. ~ Rob13Talk 10:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Video game release, Template:English anime network and Template:English anime licensee.
Use one template for releases in particular regions, can be used for international releases of films, TV series and products, should be merged into a template like "Release regions" or "Release list" or something, or it can be merged into their respective infoboxes. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928Talk 22:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Izno: Oh, I fully understand and appreciate the usefulness of that link, just saying that it currently stretches the infobox, making (almost) all video game articles look absolutely awful. For something that is inside another template like this, I would prefer to use the "tiny" setting.--IDVtalk 00:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pixels
Directed byChris Columbus
Screenplay by
Story byTim Herlihy
Based onPixels
by Patrick Jean
Produced by
Starring
CinematographyAmir Mokri
Edited byHughes Winborne
Music byHenry Jackman
Production
companies
Distributed byColumbia Pictures
Release date
  • July 24, 2015 (2015-07-24)
Running time
106 minutes[2]
Countries
LanguageEnglish
Budget
  • $129 million (gross)[4]
  • $88 million (net)[5]
Box office$244.9 million[5]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Chang, Justin (July 22, 2015). "Film Review: 'Pixels'". Variety. Retrieved October 20, 2016.
  2. ^ "Pixels (12A)". British Board of Film Classification. July 14, 2015. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
  3. ^ a b "Pixels (2015)". British Film Institute. Retrieved May 31, 2016.
  4. ^ FilmL.A. (June 15, 2016). "2015 Feature Film Study". p. 6. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
  5. ^ a b "Pixels (2015)". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved May 21, 2016.
  • Actually, no, I was thinking of merging this into a single general-purpose template for releases of anything, my thought was that all three templates generated a list of regions/countries in a similar style, here is an example. I actually used the template intended for video games on a film infobox. Also, the film was actually released in the US and China, not North America and Japan, so I would recommend adding more codes from ISO-3166, and also, NA is the code for Namibia. Also, we should see if we can merge Template:Video game release new into this.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

non-professional teams, templates can be replaced by standard sports table which doesn't require them. Frietjes (talk) 19:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 10:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary copy of template:Navbox Canada Frietjes (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not a copy of {{Navbox Canada}}, or at least it's definitely not intended as such. I don't think it's a good idea to nominate for deletion templates so soon after they're created, especially if they're drafts. But it's equally not a good idea to create such unfinished drafts directly in the template namespace. – Uanfala (talk) 12:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused. should be added to articles or deleted. Frietjes (talk) 14:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and generally duplicates Template:Ethnic and social groups of the Punjab Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out of date Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob13Talk 10:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused and out of date Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More unused fb team templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unused, list generated from Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates. for the "Fb team Al-Jaish" template, please salt after deleting to avoid recreation. Frietjes (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created seven of these for use in league tables in leagues' season articles. Now that the Sports Table templates are used for the relevant leagues, these templates (along with some others that I see in this list) have now become redundant. I therefore have no objection to the templates being deleted. However, should results grids ever be created for these leagues, the templates would then be required again, so I would recommend that no action is taken to avoid recreation. Drawoh46 (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Drawoh46, I created Module:Head to head, so you don't need them for results grids either. Frietjes (talk) 20:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete ~ Rob13Talk 10:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This template about a rather small Mexican media company is no aid to navigation. Raymie (tc) 08:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).