Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 21

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. BethNaught (talk) 17:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox that provides no assistance in navigation. Sole use is as a vanity embellishment on Sharon van Rouwendaal. Contrary to WP:NAV. Bazj (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox that provides no assistance in navigation. Sole use is as a vanity embellishment on Axel Reymond. Contrary to WP:NAV. Bazj (talk) 14:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the difference width Template:Footer European Champions 10km Open water swimming Women ? I don't understand... Ellessar1977 (talk) 16:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 11:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template subject article deleted, individual member articles either redirect to band pages or link directly to unremarkable articles under discussion regarding notability. Abovethestorm (talk) 08:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because none of the listed seasons are notable. As Spiderone said at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 Ligue Régional I: way below professional level and so does not qualify to have season-specific articles. In the same Afd GiantSnowman suggested: bundle those related [season] articles into this AFD, they are also non-notable. The template will not be useful for navigation. Its existance may encourage recreation of non-notable articles. The two remaining seasons in the template are currently up for deletion here. --Bejnar (talk) 04:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 06:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOEARLY, most of infos aren't available now. 333-blue 12:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Only three blue links. 333-blue 13:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst 05:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:38, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one article on which this template could be transcluded as the other links are all redirects to national network articles. Not enough local stations in Cd. Victoria for this to make sense. Raymie (tc) 01:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one article on which this template could be transcluded as the other links are all redirects to national network articles. It's not transcluded there, either. Raymie (tc) 01:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in San Fernando to use this template and only two stations in the area. No transclusions. Raymie (tc) 01:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in Soto la Marina to use this template and only two stations in the area. No transclusions. Raymie (tc) 01:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are no local TV stations in Villagrán, Tamps., to use this template, and only one station in the area. Raymie (tc) 01:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).