Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 1

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was replace and deleteOpabinia regalis (talk) 06:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use infobox, can simply be substituted and deleted. Alakzi (talk) 11:22, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created template that is completely redundant given the long-standing presence of the much better and more comprehensive Template:Batsmen with a ODI batting average above 40. StAnselm (talk) 02:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant to {{Star Trek}} which includes all the links and is already on all articles using {{Star Trek films}}. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.