Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 November 10
November 10
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per prior consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
A lot of these sidebars have been deleted due to the fact that they are not necessary since it only connects three articles, and all three articles are already well-connected through the see also sections, other article links. Plus it looks terrible. LADY LOTUS • TALK 21:14, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreed. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 23:31, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: Agreeing on this statement. Burklemore1 (talk) 09:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
duplicates Template:Primera División de Nicaragua and is confusing since there is more than one league in Nicaragua. Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:45, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:North Sea Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
duplicates Template:Eredivisie (ice hockey). Frietjes (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect Its a plausible alternate name for the template so it would be more useful as a redirect I think. -DJSasso (talk) 01:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
name is Oldies, but the title is Classic Hits, which duplicates the Classic Hits template. Frietjes (talk) 18:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
name is Oldies, but the content is News/Talk, which duplicates the News/Talk template. Frietjes (talk) 18:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Online Player of Year Award Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Online Poker Player of the Year Award Winners (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
no enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Original Thai Premier League Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
per this discussion. Frietjes (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - per previous consensus, no significant changes made. Fenix down (talk) 09:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Original Thai Division 2 League Football Club (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
unused after I merged it with PBC Lukoil Academic. Frietjes (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:43, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 18:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
duplicates Template:Suburbs of Pune. Frietjes (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Polish Men's Volleyball League 2013/2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:NENAN, only three links including the parent club article. As a team not playing in a fully professional league it is unlikely that sufficient players that would at the very least fulfil WP:NFOOTY let alone WP:GNG could be created for this to be a useful aid to navigation. Fenix down (talk) 17:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - This is a duplicate of JK Tammeka Tartu squad TfD nomination, please !vote there instead. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.