Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 June 19

< June 18	June 20 >

June 19

Template:8TeamBracket-NCAA3-with 3rd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:8TeamBracket-NCAA3-with 3rd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant to Template:8TeamBracket-with third and does not render correctly on iOS devices. Hydra88 (talk) 16:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete, this template is being used by 1962 ECAC Hockey Men's Ice Hockey Tournament thru 1969 ECAC Hockey Men's Ice Hockey Tournament and is absolutely accurate to the information provided, which Template:8TeamBracket-with third is not. I can't attest to iOS issue but that shouldn't render the template as impractical. PensRule11385 (talk) 02:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If possible, delete (after migrating the existing articles to the aforementioned other template, of course). After fixing a formatting error (possibly one which was causing the template to render incorrectly as stated above), I fail to see the difference between the two templates. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now that Hydra88 has edited those ECAC articles to use {{8TeamBracket-with third}}, this one is unused and the fact that it is unnecessary is even clearer. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox temple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox temple (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox Mandir (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox temple with Template:Infobox Mandir or vice-versa.
Aftab1995 (talk) 13:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support merger into Template:Infobox Mandir (2006). Template:Infobox temple seems to be created from the basic skeleton of Mandir in 2011. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The temple infobox was developed to customize additional entries for South Indian temples. I thought of keeping this separate not to clutter the original one with details which are otherwise not relevant to temples other than in South India.Ssriram mt (talk) 22:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if this is to be merged, it must merge to temple. It is highly inappropriate to use "Mandir" in non-Mandir articles. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Template:Infobox temple. Per 65.94.171.126, Mandir must not be used in non-Mandir articles. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the better quality version being named Infobox temple. Montanabw ^(talk) 05:30, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Modern Family Ratings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Modern Family Ratings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Same case as Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_July_31#Template:The_Killing_ratings. There is no need to make a template for something that will only be used on one page. This can be substituted and the template deleted. Moreover, this one is unused making it a T3 candidate. Magioladitis (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. --Netoholic @ 07:25, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:E2D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:E2D (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used in only one article (and an inactive user space draft, not edited since 2012). Article suggests that it would belong to an article "E2D parties", but that does not exist. The Banner talk 11:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. --Netoholic @ 07:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Misuse of women laws in India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:43, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Misuse of women laws in India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template that is designed to be used a s a soapbox and linking disparate topics, serving no reasonable navigational purpose. —SpacemanSpiff 08:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The corresponding very terrible soapbox article Misuse of women laws in India has been redirected to Men's rights movement in India. Let's get rid of the template as well. It's very name is POV. Bishonen | talk 08:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as inherently POV. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 14:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom —Vensatry _(ping) 16:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only purpose of this template appears to be to promote a POV. Blatantly inappropriate. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsupported promotion of a particular POV. Kevin Gorman (talk) 21:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Horribly inappropriate. --Calton | Talk 15:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The perceived POV here is deeply disturbing, but being manifestly “not neutral” alone should be enough for deletion. A general concensus to use the template might have been a counterpoint, but of the articles which transclude this template, all but one use it because the template's author added it, so there's no reprieve on that basis. Unician ∇ 19:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Constitution of India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Constitution of India (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that duplicates existing templates (all linked articles have multiple templates that are more structured). Also, linking of sections of the constitution with legislative bodies etc is not a reasonable navigational exercise. —SpacemanSpiff 08:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this template can be used in the articles linked from "Constitution" and "Parts" sections. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 14:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- We already have that at {{Indian Constitution TOC}} which is currently widely used. —SpacemanSpiff 14:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused and redundant to {{Indian Constitution TOC}}, which is more streamlined in that it doesn't overlink to anything and everything that might be mentioned in the Constitution. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect (or delete, then redirect) to discourage re-creation. -- Netoholic @ 07:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:D'Artagnan Romances

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2014 July 7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:08, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:D'Artagnan Romances (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blocked sockpuppet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was SNOW keep. This is an administrative wrapper template. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 19:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blocked sockpuppet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Is this of really any use since we've got Template:Sockpuppet and we can supply confirmed as a parameter to that to make it look just like this template but with some more links and customizability? This seems like a duplicate of sockpuppet|Username|confirmed with double braces around it. Gparyani (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as oft used SPI tool. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 14:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.