Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 November 18
November 18
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Template:TrueVisions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only two links outgoing in template, and template is unused even in those articles completely. Nate • (chatter) 19:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete It is unused, and as far as I can see has never been used in any article. Almost all entries have no corresponding article, being either unlinked, or redlinked, or links to redirects. In one case where there actually is an article, there are 10 piped links that look different in the template, but which in fact all link to the same article, which in any case has almost no content, being nothing but a list of titles and an external link. All things considered, not only is the template unused, but it would really not be any help if it were used. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Mackensen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
This is apparently an article in template namespace. If it merits keeping, it should move to article namespace under the subject's name, not David E. Schnell. Senator2029 “let's talk” 09:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's a copy of Theodore von Kármán and I've speedy-deleted it. No possible reason for this to exist. Mackensen (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
title (bios of interest to chicanos), selection, both highly biased and problematic. we have at least 2 other navboxes for latino/hispanic/mexican american topics, that cover the subject broadly. I dont think this can be salvaged. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Totally arbitrary inclusion criteria. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.