Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Technical moves)
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
[edit]Uncontroversial technical requests
[edit]- Judas and the Black Messiah (soundtrack) → Judas and the Black Messiah (soundtracks) (move · discuss) – This page contains multiple soundtracks, so the disambiguator should be in the plural. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:39, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Guilty pleasure (disambiguation) → Guilty Pleasure (currently a redirect back to Guilty pleasure (disambiguation)) (move · discuss) – WP:DIFFCAPS 162 etc. (talk) 16:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are a page mover, 162. You can probably do this one yourself. Bensci54 (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't work. Significant history at Guilty Pleasure, including 2 AFDs. 162 etc. (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- You should try the round robin procedure used by page movers and admins alike when there is significant page history at the redirect. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 21:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc. *cough* shameless plug *cough* --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)- I don't get it. I am not good with computer 162 etc. (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- You can install the Pageswap GUI plugin that @Ahecht has developed, which can help create a WP:ROUNDROBIN page swap for you if you have page-mover permissions (which you do). Raladic (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's not difficult without the GUI plugin. It's just three moves and a retarget edit. I'm sure the GUI's great, but for those shy of fancy scripts, ... — BarrelProof (talk) 22:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like @162 etc. may not have been aware that they have WP:PAGEMOVER permissions, as they were requested for them by another user on their behalf in 2022, so they may just simply not have known that they could do page swaps like this themself. Raladic (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's when they received autopatrolled. They accepted PageMover right last year. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 05:40, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like @162 etc. may not have been aware that they have WP:PAGEMOVER permissions, as they were requested for them by another user on their behalf in 2022, so they may just simply not have known that they could do page swaps like this themself. Raladic (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's not difficult without the GUI plugin. It's just three moves and a retarget edit. I'm sure the GUI's great, but for those shy of fancy scripts, ... — BarrelProof (talk) 22:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- You can install the Pageswap GUI plugin that @Ahecht has developed, which can help create a WP:ROUNDROBIN page swap for you if you have page-mover permissions (which you do). Raladic (talk) 21:55, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't get it. I am not good with computer 162 etc. (talk) 21:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc. *cough* shameless plug *cough* --Ahecht (TALK
- You should try the round robin procedure used by page movers and admins alike when there is significant page history at the redirect. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 21:09, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't work. Significant history at Guilty Pleasure, including 2 AFDs. 162 etc. (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are a page mover, 162. You can probably do this one yourself. Bensci54 (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- These Are "The Damned" → The Damned (1962 film) (currently a redirect back to These Are "The Damned") (move · discuss) – According to the page's history, it seemed that c.7 years ago, this film's confusing titles and release dates caused a number of flubs. In the UK, it's just titled The Damned; in the USA, it was These Are the Damned. And the very first theatrical release date, which is what we always classify a film by, was in Australia 1962. However, its first UK premiere was 1963.
So first somebody attempted to change it to the US title; then when somebody reverted it back to the simple The Damned, they also apparently added (1963 film) rather than (1962 film)—to distinguish from others, like a 1969 film by the same name. And just to make matters worse, the lede paragraph here erroneously refers to it as a 1961 film—which I'll fix now. (That's a misinterpretation of film wrap-up vs. cinemas probably.)
So I was hoping to correct it all by swapping the redirect "(1962 film)" with the main article "(1963 film)"……Except "(1962 film)" had more than 1 edit. So I tried to do the A-B-C page move method, but I failed and I didn't want to create further problems. So I just need help at this point, please!
Could an admin please move the main film article's content onto the page titled The Damned (1962 film)? Afterwards, the following should all be redirects based on alternative names or incorrect names, just in case: ReDir.#1: The Damned (1963 film); RD #2: These Are the Damned; & RD #3: These Are "The Damned" (the latter because the poster has it stylized as such, w/ quotation marks). I apologize for the complications, but I appreciate the assistance in advance, thank you. --Cinemaniac86TalkStalk 10:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - I wonder if the longer US title was used to prevent confusion with a different book or film or comic, as even by the early 1960s they were a lot of things called "The Damned" as seen here. That confusion continues to bedevil us decades later. At any rate, I think the requester's suggestion for The Damned (1962 film) is solid and based on how history turned out, but I will leave it for more discussion if anyone knows more about the rules for US vs. UK matters in article titles. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. I personally prefer the US title myself, to distinguish it from Luchino Visconti's more well-known debaucherous masterpiece, The Damned (1969). And I concur, re: dab. But alas, since it's a UK Hammer Film Productions, kinda resigned to being yet another damned Damned, if you will! --Cinemaniac86TalkStalk 13:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - I wonder if the longer US title was used to prevent confusion with a different book or film or comic, as even by the early 1960s they were a lot of things called "The Damned" as seen here. That confusion continues to bedevil us decades later. At any rate, I think the requester's suggestion for The Damned (1962 film) is solid and based on how history turned out, but I will leave it for more discussion if anyone knows more about the rules for US vs. UK matters in article titles. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hyderabad, Sindh → Hyderabad, Pakistan (currently a redirect back to Hyderabad, Sindh) (move · discuss) – As per WP:CONSISTENT with other Pakistani cities. Titan2456 (talk) 14:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Khelafat Majlish → Khelafat Majlis (currently a redirect back to Khelafat Majlish) (move · discuss) – The party's name is Majlis, not Majlish. Please look at its website and Facebook page for confirmation. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 07:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
[edit]Contested technical requests
[edit]- COMITIA → Comitia (convention) (move · discuss) – MOS:ALLCAPS; renaming to Comitia is also fine lullabying (talk) 02:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment that is a primary topic change if it moves to "Comitia" ; that would need a full-up move request. IIRC "COMITIA" is an acronym -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jade Thirlwall → Jade (singer) (currently a redirect instead to Jade (given name)) (move · discuss) – She goes mononymously in her solo work, that can be checked on all streaming platforms [1], [2], [3], official website. {{{sig}}} Bluemoon878 (talk) 23:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | requester = Bluemoon878}}
- I suggest opening a full discussion on this since there are other singers with the name Jade, be it with or without their surname/family name. – robertsky (talk) 02:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not a bad idea tbh. Among the bevy of other Jades on that given name article page, several of them are also singers. One should thoroughly check on AllMusic and/or Genius to be sure none of them ever went mononymously.
- For the time being, until a full discussion occurs and/or consensus, w/e…what I'd recommend is, immediately following her birthdate in the lede, having it say "known mononymously as Jade" or words to that effect. That's fairly customary. --Cinemaniac86TalkStalk 13:47, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest opening a full discussion on this since there are other singers with the name Jade, be it with or without their surname/family name. – robertsky (talk) 02:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine → NYU Grossman School of Medicine (currently a redirect back to New York University Grossman School of Medicine) (move · discuss) – WP:COMMONNAME. The organization's website and social media, as well as reliable media sources, routinely use this name. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's a whole bunch of other schools part of NYU with all of their respective article titles also using the full "New York University x" (New York University Tisch School of the Arts, New York University College of Arts & Science, New York University Graduate School of Arts and Science, New York University Stern School of Business, New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University Institute of Fine Arts, New York University School of Law, New York University College of Dentistry, New York University School of Professional Studies, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, New York University Silver School of Social Work) in the title. So this should probably be a full WP:RM discussion for all of those together, rather than one being different to the others per our policy on WP:CONSISTENT article titles. Raladic (talk) 03:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)