Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 227

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 220←Archive 225Archive 226Archive 227Archive 228Archive 229Archive 230

Draft:White City Park (Trenton)

I, ChazConner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. My schedule got very busy and I lapsed in creating this page. Sorry about that. I'd like to get back to it please. Thanks. -ChazConner (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

@ChazConner:  Done - I have restored it, but there is nothing there? Read WP:Your first article for advice, and click the blue "Submit" button when you have something there that explains why the subject is important or significant, with references to back it up. See WP:Notability and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Editorial Nascimento (Publishing House)

to continue editing it -AndresGeorgeN (talk) 12:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

@AndresGeorgeN:  Done. Check out WP:Your first article. The focus of the article is not clear: I think you need to decide whether it is about the publishing house or about Manuel Carlos' life story. Either way, you need references to reliable published sources to confirm what it says - see WP:Verifiability. When it is ready, click the "Submit" button to send it for review. JohnCD (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles Severance

I, Astralian, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Astralian (talk) 21:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

@Astralian: it was restored for you last October after this request and has been there for you to edit ever since. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Vivienne_Ming

I, 173.164.228.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.164.228.249 (talk) 21:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

I would like to edit this and resubmit to Wikipedia -173.164.228.249 (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Gay and Lesbian Information News Centre

I, Gaylinc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gaylinc (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Dhananjay Acharya

This person is indian entrepreneur,founded world's first student social network, studentwisdom. it is his real life story, please review before deleting any content and then click the "Save page" button below -Ananya9537 (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Not done This article was deleted because it was unambiguously promotional and a quick look shows that it was indeed written to promote Acharya. As far as claims of being the first of something, just saying that someone is the first to do something isn't enough since you'd need to back this up with reliable, independent sources that confirmed the claim. Things like that can be easily contested. For example, Facebook started as a social network for university students when it launched in 2004 and remained student-only for a number of years before non-students could join. Similarly, Unii launched in 2013. What I'm basically trying to say is that saying that someone is the first to do something isn't something that automatically gains notability. Also, it looks like you tried to make another version of this at Dhananjay acharya, so it's now up for AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Windows 10 Firewall Control

I, Okg2004, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Okg2004 (talk) 13:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm going to continue working on the article -Okg2004 (talk) 13:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Neelakanta Radhakrishnan

I, 117.232.150.152, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.232.150.152 (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

File:AdvertCity alpha screenshot1.png

OTRS permission confirmed, Ticket #2015112210011844 --- Rrburke (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:AdvertCity procedural megacorp description.png

OTRS permission confirmed, Ticket #2015112210011844 --- Rrburke (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:AdvertCity screenshot cyberspace.png

OTRS permission confirmed, Ticket #2015112210011844 --- Rrburke (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:AdvertCity screenshot procedural description.png

OTRS permission confirmed, Ticket #2015112210011844 --- Rrburke (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

File:AdvertCity screenshot procedural description 2.png

OTRS permission confirmed, Ticket #2015112210011844 --- Rrburke (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Mucoid cap

I am formally requesting that the deleted content be userfied. I made edits to it, which I did not save onto my personal storage. I want to improve upon the content. -05:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Heelop (talk) :* Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Ihave jsut restored the history, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mucoid_cap&action=history you can choose a version and copy it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

I oppose this undeletion. This content was a blatent WP:POV Fork - this editor got him or herself blocked for disruptive editing on the article that existed back in 2007, and were topic banned under the PSCI arbcom DS by Guy in 2009; warned again about the PSCI DS in October 2015, and just recently moved the old article and put up this new article in its place. This is terrible behavior, and there is no reason to undelete the article. I realize as I am writing this that User:Graeme Bartlett has already undeleted it. Please redelete it. Jytdog (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
OK due to topic ban for this user on this topic, I have reversed this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I know you have to be incredibly processive to keep up with everything - thanks for reconsidering. Jytdog (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wishing Well Pictures

2605:E000:9042:6F00:7D02:FA06:55A4:8B56 (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:46, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Rocky Allen (technician)

Please move to User:Jax_0677/Rocky Allen (technician) -Jax 0677 (talk) 21:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@Jax 0677:  Not done. In view of the findings of WP:Articles for deletion/Rocky Allen (technician) I am not willing to userfy this. You could ask the closing admin, C.Fred (talk), but consider WP:BLPCRIME: "For subjects who are not public figures, editors must seriously consider not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured... Allegations, accusations, investigations, and arrests on suspicion of involvement are not a conviction" . JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Andrine Tomter

Hi, please restore article for this footballer who since deletion in 2012 has played ten times for her national team. Now meets WP:NSOCCER. Asking here as deleting admin is not available per their talk page. -Bring back Regi Blinker (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

There was hardly anything there. Just two sentences. But anyway...
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Alexander Robertson.jpg

The image dates from 1895 and is in the public domain --- Rrburke (talk) 10:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

How do we know that? The imformation says "Robertson Family photograph albums", so was this image publisehd before, who was the photographer, and what is the evidence it was taken in 1895? What is the subject of the photo? We will need some answers to avoid another deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Graeme. Let me withdraw this request for the moment. I had thought that because no information is known about the photographer, that according to the UK's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, the work would have entered the public domain 70 years after its publication, and that, as a never-published work, it would have passed into the public domain in the US 120 years after its creation, on January 1st, 2016 (See [1]). However, the owner of the photograph attests that the image has indeed been published in the interim since its creation, and I will have to establish when and where in order to ascertain its current copyright status. -- Rrburke (talk) 13:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The photograph was published in the UK in Classic Boat Magazine in 2008. According to http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/publicdomain.cfm , as a work published outside the United States after 1 March 1989 in a country that is a signatory to the Berne Convention, the copyright term is 70 years following the death of the author. Since nothing is known of the author, the term is 70 years after the creation of the image. The image entered the public domain in both the UK and the United States on January 1st, 1966, i.e. prior to its publication in 2008. As for the accuracy of the date of creation, we have the attestation of the photograph's owner. OTRS confidentiality precludes revealing more, but I am satisfied that the photograph's owner is in a position to know when it was taken. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
@Rrburke:  Done, I have restored it, removed the deletion tag, and added a public domain tag quoting you above. Please fix up the tagging and add the OTRS ticket to it. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bryna_Aisin_Gioro

please userfy for me, I think I may be able to make a case for this, if not I will have it redeleted myself, thanks! -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

 Done. @Kintetsubuffalo: Restored to your user space at User:Kintetsubuffalo/Bryna Aisin Gioro along with the talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! Some of this stuff off the bat sounds hard to verify/swallow, I will do my best! Thanks again!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Samsung (disambiguation)

This was procedurally deleted per WP:G6 on 16 March because it's not a redirect to a disambiguation page. Unfortunately, Samsung(Name), from which it was originally moved, has now come up at RfD where to have the history of this page would be useful.

I don't necessarily need this undeleted but would like a full history of the page from now back to May-June 2007. At that time, Samsung(Name) was discussed at AfD and subsequently moved to it, with a recommendation to delete the redirect which was not followed through. I believe that Samsung (disambiguation) would have been a DAB when moved, but around 7 July 2008 would have been turned into a redirect to Samsung Group (my clue for this is a bot fixing a double redirect), which in turn was moved to Samsung on 12 May 2011.

I imagine that the content of the DAB was held to be sufficiently mentioned at the article Samsung (at that time, Samsung Group) so as not to need it; e.g. I presume there would have been an entry for Samsung Town, which is prominent in the article. But I'd like to confirm this as part of the RfD discussion.

If you undelete it, please put it at User:SimonTrew/Samsung (disambiguation), and I likely will CSD G7 after looking at the history. If you prefer, a copy-paste of the history dump would be just as good for me.

Thanks Si Trew (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Si Trew:  Done - I have put a copy-paste of the history, back to its creation in April 2007, at User:JohnCD/draft. It is wrapped in nowiki tags to stop templates expanding, and makes more sense if you view it in edit-source mode. Let me know when you've finished with it, or if you want more. JohnCD (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thanks, I'm done with it, you can delete it now. Si Trew (talk) 09:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Done, thanks. JohnCD (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Brooklands Radio

I, Jamespearce91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamespearce91 (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

After collecting more information about the topic and a wider range of reliable references, I would like to get this page edited and hopefully acceptable for publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespearce91 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you - jamespearce91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespearce91 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Wikipedia:How_to_implement_version_control_in_templates

I, Luis150902, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 12:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Jose Painting in Lobby of One World Trade Center.jpg

Permission conformed by OTRS ticket 2015121010019465 --- Rrburke (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File:WFU School of Medicine logo.png

@Rrburke: has just confirmed a Commons-compatible CC license, so the previous deletions can now be undeleted. -Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

182.71.9.131 request

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 182.71.9.131 (talk) 04:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Jonathan Leshnoff

Page was deleted due to absence from editing. The person writing the article was researching ways to get the article approved by the Wikipedia editors. -Majorpublishing (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

David Atkinson (illustrator)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Illustrational (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC) Hello - apologies, wasn't aware of the 6th month time limit and other work got in the way - yrs Illustrational — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illustrational (talk • contribs) 11:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Illustrational: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I think you are falling into the trap we call WP:BOMBARDMENT. I have not checked all your 29 references, but #1 is about an exhibition by his art master and does not mention him, #2 and 3 are brief references in articles by or about his pupils, #4 is his own website, #5 is the website of a school where he studied, but does not mention him, the next three are all about the same book which he illustrated. Many others are links to his work. What is needed to establish WP:Notability in Wikipedia's sense is independent references that are about him, and discuss him and his work in some depth. Check out WP:Notability (summary). I suggest that you prune the trivial references and concentrate on finding a few really relevant ones. JohnCD (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Reload Studios

I, Flinn555, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Flinn555 (talk) 14:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Flinn555: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

BAF Shaheen College Dhaka Green Thumbs

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ni.somrat (talk) 16:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Ni.somrat:
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BAF Shaheen College Dhaka Green Thumbs, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Don W. Cleveland

I, SanDiegoDWC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SanDiegoDWC (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

I had a personal issue that prevented me from working on the page (updating it to show more documentation). If you undelete it, I will work on it and hopefully the new sources I list will pass approval.

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Donald William Roy DSO

I, Mailliwtug, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mailliwtug (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

I wish to correct the errors by providing references in the correct way and i also wish to add more information from newspaper obituary articles— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mailliwtug (talk • contribs) 17:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:David Bawiec

I, Bluestar2003, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bluestar2003 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

@Bluestar2003: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Reed F. Noss

I, 174.22.14.239, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The article was deleted yesterday because due to my discouragement it had been 6 months since I last edited it, but I want to try editing it again, with the goal of eliminating 'peacock phrases' as was suggested back in September -174.22.14.239 (talk) 20:58, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

OutLawStar (EP)

There was some information I thought was off but I rechecked the sources to confirm it was all correct -Joeyfats67 (talk) 18:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@Joeyfats67:  Done as a G7 deletion restored at author's request. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Kristin Groulx

contribs) deleted page Kristin Groulx (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://wiki.polskibreivik.pl/page_Special:Diff/711594148.html) 

   21:58, 25 March 2016 Anthony Appleyard (talk }}

contribs) restored page Kristin Groulx (2 revisions restored: histmerge) 

   21:58, 25 March 2016 Anthony Appleyard (talk -Writemorerightmore (talk) 06:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
  • @Writemorerightmore: This was deleted as a copyright issue by Anthony Appleyard, however from what I can tell from the source material it looks like wiki.polskibreivik.pl has a fair use license. It's really, really hard to tell because the website has an extremely poor layout, likely due to broken html. However I will say that the article has a few issues with it, which I'll list as follows:
  1. The article's sourcing is fairly poor, as it relies on a lot of WP:PRIMARY sources like things written by Groulx or people/places/organizations affiliated with her. It also relies on e-commerce sites like Amazon, which are inappropriate as sourcing.
  2. Some of the article looks to be unsourced or isn't entirely backed up by the sources given. This is a huge issue on Wikipedia, since we need the sources to explicitly state the claims in the article. You can't draw your own conclusions from the source material like you could in a personal paper, which is one of the biggest differences between a personal paper/essay and an encyclopedia article. (WP:OR)
  3. Some portions are dangerously close to being promotional, as it contains some phrases that are considered to be PR-speak like "love of theatre". It's not bad, but it does need a lot of cleanup.
  4. There's a lot of detail in the article. This isn't always a bad thing, but the thing to remember is that you need a lot of sourcing to justify going into a huge amount of detail about a given topic. Encyclopedia articles are meant to be brief overviews of someone's life and I'd say that only about a quarter of the article (not including book lists) would actually merit inclusion, if that.
To put things bluntly, this would require a fairly large amount of cleanup, to the point where I'd actually say that this should be re-written from scratch. I'm willing to help with this, if you want, however I don't think that the deleted versions would be all that helpful offhand given how many issues there were with sourcing and other elements. Of course this relies heavily on whether or not Groulx passes WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG - putting out books and working in various fields does not always guarantee notability.
Finally, I do have to ask: do you have a conflict of interest in this situation? Were you asked to create the article? If so, you need to read over WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Something else to take into consideration is that putting in a ton of sources does not make an article seem more notable for having them. If anything, it can actually make someone seem less notable rather than more notable. Offhand I'm looking at the sources and I don't know that any of them will be usable. The sources are either primary, e-commerce sites, or they're considered to be self-published sources like blogs, which undergo little to no editorial oversight. For example, while Bitten by Books is a good blog (I'm familiar with it) it's not one that would pass muster as a reliable source. It takes an awful lot for a blog to be considered a reliable source and one of the most well known book blogs (Dear Author) only barely passes as a reliable source - and even then only in very, very specific circumstances. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
  • I finished doing an overview of the page's sources - none of them are reliable sources that can establish notability and the majority of them are ones that actually shouldn't be used on an article at all. You can't use a general link to Ancestry's DNA page to assert that Groulx is a noted genealogist and state what her DNA makeup is - that doesn't back up any of the claims and to be honest, a general interest in genealogy is not the same thing as being someone well-known in the field. I also did a search for sourcing in general and I don't see where she's received any coverage in places Wikipedia would consider usable as a reliable source. My recommendation here is that you look into hosting this information in another site like Wikia, where's the guidelines are far more lax than they are here. If this was restored it'd almost certainly be deleted via AfD, given the lack of sourcing out there. I'm sorry, since I know that this can be hard to hear, but I just don't think that trying to restore the page on Wikipedia is really a good idea at this point in time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi :@Tokyogirl79: There is no COI. I did meet Groulx in 2008 at a book event and have followed her on her FB fan page since then. I have no relation. Just a fan of her work, as she is well known in Ottawa, Canada where she wrote the books and is a local celebrity. I pulled much information from her IMDB page, and other sources around the internet. I would like help re-writing a page. It is okay if it is much smaller/shorter with less info. I am still getting used to the process of editing on Wikipedia and love writing bios on notable people. Thank you for offering to assist. I accept, if you have time, to review and rewrite. Writemorerightmore (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

  • @Writemorerightmore: Well... the problem here is that I'm not quite sure that a re-write will really help matters much. I tried looking for coverage of Groulx, but I can't see where she's actually been the focus of any independent and reliable coverage like newspaper articles or even reviews in trade journals. All persons need coverage to pass notability guidelines and while Groulx seems to have been active as an author and actor, she's never actually gained any coverage for either thing. The most she's had is appearances at various festivals, but festival appearances don't count towards notability on Wikipedia. I don't have any true issue with you trying to work on this via AfD, but I get the strong impression that Groulx is someone who would not pass notability guidelines at this point in time, as she's never actually gained coverage for her acting or writing. At most it would be something to keep in the draft space, with the potential to never pass NAUTHOR/GNG. I think that it'd likely be better for you to create your own wiki in a location like Wikia. It wouldn't be Wikipedia, but it would give you the potential to write about her somewhere, without the rules and restrictions of Wikipedia. I can still help, but I just think that it might be better to focus on some other authors or actors at this point in time, since Groulx looks like she wouldn't pass the fairly strict notability guidelines on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Anatoliy Lesnikov

I, E Guano, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. E Guano (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

  • This was restored back in October 2013. You'd edited it so I'm restoring it, but I will say that if it does continue to get declined it's unlikely that this will continue to be restored. Something to take into consideration is that coverage does not have to be in English, so if there's Russian-language coverage you could add that. You might also want to ask for help at WP:RUSSIA, since they might be able to help look for sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Christian Narkiewicz Laine.jpeg

Permission received in OTRS Ticket 2015100510013984 --- Rrburke (talk) 01:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The copyright holder is Kieran Conlon, as clarified in the OTRS ticket. I have made the appropriate adjustments to the file page. -- Rrburke (talk) 11:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Manoj Muntashir

I know that this article was deleted due to absence of reliable sources according to biography of living persons. But now, I have enough reliable sources to claim the article such as IMDb, Mid-Day, Bollywood Hungama, Hindustan Times and many more. Also, the person is notable enough. So, I please request you to restore the article and add a one more feather in this great repository of Knowledge, Wikipedia ! -❤ TrendSPLEND ✉ 12:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC) ❤ TrendSPLEND ✉ 12:27, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

@TrendSPLEND:  Done. I have reset the PROD-blp template, which gives you seven days to add reliable sources. Note that IMDb is not considered reliable, as content is user-generated and experience has shown that there is not adequate editorial control. I don't know about your other sources. JohnCD (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:CMR Rangers working alongside local PD.jpg

Permission received in OTRS ticket 2016012710016437 --- Rrburke (talk) 12:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:CMR recruiting poster.jpg

Permission received in OTRS ticket 2016012710016437 --- Rrburke (talk) 12:44, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:CMR Assists Flight for Life.jpg

Permission received in OTRS ticket 2016012710016437 --- Rrburke (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_227&oldid=1138664108"