Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/History of Georgia (country)

This Request for mediation has been closed. This case was closed because: "Unsuccessful: Lack of participation of one party.". Case was closed at 20:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC).. Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.

Click 'show' to view case details

Historical map of the Roman Empire in the article "History of Georgia (country)" Formal mediation case Article History of Georgia (country) (talk)  Opened 07 Apr 2010 Mediator Sunray (talk) Status Open Notes None view talk edit delete watch Dispute specifics Involved users Aregakn (talk · contribs), filing party Iberieli (talk · contribs) Articles concerned in this dispute History of Georgia (country) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted [1] is the discussion of the two parties on the talk page of the article. [2] is the discussion taken place with the "3rd opinion". [3] is the link to an Informal Mediation I requested in the Cabal almost 2 weeks ago, which was not responded to. Issues to be mediated Primary issues The compliance of a historical map ([4]) made by an editor to Wiki rules. Aregakn proposes that this map is not professional, proper, is incomplete as well as unreferenced and constitutes an Original Research. Iberieli argues all of the above. The change of the created map to a scanned map ([5])from a historical atlas. Aregakn proposes to change the created map with a published map from a historical atlas used in universities for academic purposes (example: [6]). Iberieli argues that the published historical map is "outdated" (in his words). Additional issues (added by other parties) None. Parties' agreement to mediation All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign within seven days, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "Agree" or "Disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed, but can be made at the talk Agree. Aregakn (talk) 21:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Agree. Iberieli (talk) 04:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC) Decision of the Mediation Committee A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section; all comments should go on the talk page, unless a party is specifically requested to reply here by a Committee member. Accepted. I'll get a mediator on this as quickly as possible. For the mediation committee, Xavexgoem (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)