Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 July 9
I have had this article authored for a while, but still haven't received any feedback. As a result, it's still considered an unreviewed article. I have added links from other places to it, but it's still called an 'orphan'. Any help or suggestions to improve this article are greatly appreciated.
- Excellent article. Please try and add some links to other Wikipedia articles, if you can, though. Chevymontecarlo - alt 15:06, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi looking or feedback on this after moving to main section. This i did after getting feedback for adding categories as in usersapce categories were not allowed. Kindly review it and let me know the feedback before choosing to deelete in case it does not meet guidelines.
Hello. I have updated the content with inline citations and also edited the text so as not to have any ststement kind of text. thanks for all your patience
Have reedited whole content for neutrality issues and removed any word which might look as an statement. ~~Deepblue555 (talk) 07:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Please try and use inline citations to display your references correctly in the article. Also, there are some neutrality problems with the article's tone and language, please see the essay/help page I have linked to for more information. Chevymontecarlo - alt 15:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely improve the referencing. WP:Referencing for beginners is a good guide. :) Good luck, Pianotech (talk) 22:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. I have updated the content with inline citations and also edited the text so as not to have any ststement kind of text. thanks for all your patience.Deepblue555 (talk) 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, that's fine. Don't forget to sign your posts on talk pages like this with the four tildes though - ~~~~. Chevymontecarlo 05:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hello. I have updated the content with inline citations and also edited the text so as not to have any ststement kind of text. thanks for all your patience.Deepblue555 (talk) 11 July 2010 (UTC)
The article is about a well-respected PR agency in Oxfordshire, UK. I have included details of clients, services and notable history items on the page, supported hopefully with source data where appropriate. As far as I can tell this matches the same style of article as other similar PR agencies on Wikipedia, but I do have a banner saying that this feels like advertising. I have amended the article a lot since then, but would like feedback to approve this before I post it.
Thank you.
- You need to try and add categories to the article, as well as names to the references and external links, like this:
<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk Guardian website]</ref>
Also, it'd probably be better if you used sections instead of bold text to separate the different parts of the article, like this:
==References==
Hope this suggestions are useful. Chevymontecarlo - alt 15:16, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
After researching the information and learning how to edit a Wikipedia article, this is my official first draft. The article is about a local software development and consulting services company. I am still finding more information and sources, but I would like to get some feedback on what I have so far.
- Nice work. I would consider adding an infobox to the article, if you can. Chevymontecarlo - alt 15:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. I am having trouble with the infobox and picture. Can you suggest an easy template to work with?
- Well, you can try Template:Infobox company maybe. Chevymontecarlo 09:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Please review this article about a top rated Toronto-based law firm. It was created some time ago, but I have not had success finding a reviewer to provide feedback. I want to make sure it meets Wikipedia standards so that I can push it live and make it searchable. Thanks!
- You need to try and add names to the references, like this:
<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/article/example/me Guardian newspaper article]</ref>
- Hope this helps. Chevymontecarlo 05:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Profile a new social networking site to rival Facebook and Google Me to be released in the Fall of 2010.
Hi there! Several problems. First, it seems more like a press release or advertisement rather than an encylopedia article. Secondly, the article cites no references as the source for the information. In its current form, the article will likely be tagged for deletion as it will be seen as promotional and non-notable (due to lack of references). Wish I could give a better review, but that's my honest opinion. Pianotech (talk) 21:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- You need to add reliable references to prove the article's notability (to show it's worthy of an article on Wikipedia). Chevymontecarlo 09:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
just would like a review so that the box on top of the article changes to the orange kind like Robby Naish has on his page... I will be adding a photo tonight and an external link to the L'express news paper with also a webisit that holds more details
- Please try and use inline citations to correctly display your references in the article. Chevymontecarlo 05:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Looking for anyone with additional information on Jonah Kumalae, ukulele maker. Also, how can this page be uploaded with pictures?
- Hi, I see you have made two requests for the same article. Please see the other request entry, as there are replies and suggestions there. Thanks. Chevymontecarlo 05:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)