Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2007 January 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< January 12 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 14 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 13

[edit]

Does this equation mean anything?

[edit]

Recently while trying to test different fortran compilers, I invented this formula:

d = (a*b - a*c)*(a*b - b*c)*(b*c - a*c)

It served to reveal different behaviour between 2 cpus which were meant to be the same. I could imagine using it as a basis for art, but does it mean anything? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.57.5.115 (talk) 10:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No.--80.136.167.106 11:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You might be interested in symmetric polynomials. --HappyCamper 13:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It does graph rather interestingly. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How do you graph it ? Implicit equation in 3D ? --Xedi 14:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You can simplify it easily: d = a*b*c*(b-c)*(a-c)*(b-a), the zero set of which is six planes a=0,b=0,c=0,b=c,a=c,b=a. It has rotational symmetry about the line a=b=c. --Salix alba (talk) 23:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is the cross product. It is used to find a vector perpendicular to two other vectors. Rya Min 19:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. It's a function from three scalar values to one scalar value, not from two vector values to a vector value. Rawling4851 15:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It could be the dot product? Rya Min 21:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again: no.--80.136.162.146 21:57, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh. Then I dont know. I actually realized that it wasnt the dot product write after i clicked "save page." Im just gonna quit trying now. Rya Min 02:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]