Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Language/2018 August 6
Language desk | ||
---|---|---|
< August 5 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 7 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
August 6
[edit]Arabic translation
[edit]What does this say?
مرحباً، تم فتح نقاش في 26 أبريل حولَ سَحب الصلاحيات من المُستخدمين الذين لا تنطبق عليهم شُروط الصلاحيات، وبالتالي وحسب الخُلاصة التي توصل إليها المُجتمع العربي تقرر سَحب الصَلاحيات من أي شخص حاصل على صلاحية مراجع تلقائي ولا يَملك 50 تعديل على الأقل في نطاق المقالات، ومن أي شخص حاصل على صلاحية مُحرر ولا يملك 150 تعديل على الأقل في نطاق المقالات، ولكن في حال كانت الصلاحية ضرورية للمستخدم لنقل الملفات عبر المشاريع أو مكافحة التخريب أو غيرها من الأمور يُرجى توضيح الأمر من خلال ترك رِسالة في صفحة نقاشي.
مُلاحظة: عملية سحب الصلاحية ستتم بعد أسبوع من هذا الإخطار.
This is a note left on my Arabic user talk page (looks like almost all my edits there are the result of people importing pages from here), and while it comes with a translation, it's done by a computer or by someone not fluent in English:
Hi. There was a discussion on April 26 about the removing of access from users who do not fit the conditions and terms of obtaining them. Thus, and according to the conclusion the Arabic Wikipedia community have reached, it has been decided to remove accesses from all users who have obtained the Autopatrolled user right, and did not contributed in 50 edits at least in article filed, as well as anyone who has obtained the Editor user right and has not participated in 150 edits at least in article filed. But, if you see that this user right or access is necessary for intro wiki files transport or in fighting vandalism, please let me know in my discussion
I get the point that they've raised the minimums for autopatrolled status, and they're willing to make exceptions for people who do a lot of interwiki work, but I'm missing a bunch of it, e.g. what they mean by "editor" (it's not linked in the Arabic or the English versions of the message) and what kinds of edits qualify toward meeting this minimum. Nyttend (talk) 23:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)