Humanities desk
< August 7	<< Jul \| August \| Sep >>	August 9 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

August 8

Introduction to Thomas Clark

Could anyone introduce briefly to me Thomas Clark, who is the author of the prose-poem "In Praise of Walking"? Are there any other important works that he has written? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.251.216.209 (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Thomas A. Clark biographical note, Thomas A. Clark at the Scottish Poetry Library. He’s published at least seven books and Wikipedia has an article on his publishing company, Moschatel Press. 184.147.136.32 (talk) 11:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion: "Double belt loops" ?

Greetings!

(a) What is the correct term for those nifty belt loops which can be used with narrow as well as wide belts?

(b) When and where (a brand ?) did they appear?

(c) Are they found exclusively on mens pants?

Thanks for answers and suggestions! GEEZER^{nil nisi bene} 12:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, they are just called "double belt loops" and have been around for at least a decade; The Straight Dope discussed them in 2004. They appear on women's skirts and trousers as well. 184.147.136.32 (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! "doubled belt loops" does the job. However, with womens pants this is also used for two loops right next to each other (which I also still need for the article, as well as those two which are "crossing". Lets see, whether some more Followers of Fashion drop by... GEEZER^{nil nisi bene} 14:54, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I just have to ask, what unbearable tragedy occurs if one dares to use a narrow belt in wide belt loops ? StuRat (talk) 08:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC) [reply]

One will be dressed unfashionably, the most horrific fate that can befall anyone between the ages of 12 and 25. Tevildo (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A smaller belt in larger loops would make the belt tend to slide around more, to be less stable. Belt loops approximating the width of the belt work better. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:00, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From personal experience, it does slide a bit, but not enough to make things weird. That is, the buckle stays in the general front and the pants remain up. It very well may be terribly unfashionable. I've never had anyone tell me so, but I don't hang around the types of people who'd care. If there's any doubt in your situation, narrow belts should probably go in narrow loops. Wide belts definitely in wide loops. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or buy clothes that fit and make a belt unnecessary? ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 11:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That definitely could work, for many. In my case, somewhat like The Incredible Hulk, I shrink and grow a few notches within a year. A belt just makes financial sense. And thanks for reminding me I forgot that monkey in my sandbox! Poor thing. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talking about sex, is it sexual harassment?

If men are talking about sex in a non-demeaning manner in front of women, is that sexual harassment? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.156.170.130 (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read our article on sexual harrassment? We can't really tell you what can or can't be construed as sexual harrassment, you might want to consult a legal professional for specifics. uhhlive (talk) 13:06, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, and maybe even more importantly, consult your company's policy manual, and ask HR if you still have questions. Keep in mind it's not just "talking about sex" - harassment has to do with "creating a hostile work environment". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When Nations Acquired Radar

Are there any reliable sources, or ways of approximating the relative dates at which each nation (or at the very least, the major ones) during and after World War II acquired operational radar? I recognize that this is a fuzzy, vague question to propose, as credible opinions may vary both on what constitutes operational capacity and what historical circumstances constitute a nation reaching even agreed-upon standards, but so far I have been unable to track down any source that neatly organizes and presents anything even approaching approximate dates; rather, most sites seem focused on the history of radar in a piecemeal fashion that isn't organized around relative time differences.

I'm not expecting anyone to go digging up these dates for me; rather, I am interested in whether or not this has already been done in a book or article that I am simply not aware of. Thanks! LanceSBush (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We have quite a lengthy and detailed article on the history of radar. Looie496 (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Court judgement

Please advise where I can read the (preferably translated) court judgement of this fascinating recent case. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowing/creditcards/10231556/Man-who-created-own-credit-card-sues-bank-for-not-sticking-to-terms.html Links to legal analysis of this case would also be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.119.208 (talk) 19:49, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]