Computing desk
< March 16	<< Feb \| March \| Apr >>	March 18 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

March 17

Companies selling satellite bandwidth?

Is there such a thing? I had a chat with a guy a while ago and he mentioned his company sells (rents?) satellite bandwidth to corporate customers. Is that a thing? Maybe I'm misremembering but it had something to do with selling satellite access. If it does exist, what would that company's product be called? (If Microsoft sells software and hardware, for example.)

Sorry for any confusion and thanks for any help! Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 11:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Look at VSAT. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content-ID

According to RFC2392[1], does every email attachment need a valid Content-ID field? Or do only attachments referenced by embedded references require Content-ID?

Context:

I'm using this Ruby gem[2] to create emails. Using mail 2.6.1, I produced this email, in which the attachment, even though it's not referenced by anything, contains a Content-ID field:

Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 19:21:51 +0800
From: sender@example.com
To: recipient@example.com
Message-ID: <5c8e2dcf1b815_79e12b1adec0ef5841231@desk.mail>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf19026_79e12b1adec0ef58411fc";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
X-Powered-By: Zammad - Helpdesk/Support (https://zammad.org/)
X-Mailer: Zammad Mail Service


----==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf19026_79e12b1adec0ef58411fc
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf18fbc_79e12b1adec0ef584104e";
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf18fbc_79e12b1adec0ef584104e
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Welcome!
>
> Thank you for installing Zammad. =C3=A4=C3=B6=C3=BC=C3=9F
>=

----==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf18fbc_79e12b1adec0ef584104e--

----==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf19026_79e12b1adec0ef58411fc
Content-Type: text/calendar;
 charset=UTF-8;
 filename=schedule.ics
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=schedule.ics
Content-ID: <5c8e2dcf1ca6e_79e12b1adec0ef5841344@desk.mail>

content_file1_normally_should_be_an_ics_calendar_file
----==_mimepart_5c8e2dcf19026_79e12b1adec0ef58411fc--

|}

Using mail 2.7.1, using the exact same inputs, now the same attachment does not have a Content-ID field:

Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 19:17:06 +0800
From: sender@example.com
To: recipient@example.com
Message-ID: <5c8e2cb229061_75182aafbd794f5476a@desk.mail>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c51_75182aafbd794f5475f5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
X-Powered-By: Zammad - Helpdesk/Support (https://zammad.org/)
X-Mailer: Zammad Mail Service


----==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c51_75182aafbd794f5475f5
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="--==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c01_75182aafbd794f547430"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c01_75182aafbd794f547430
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Welcome!=0D
>=0D
> Thank you for installing Zammad. =C3=A4=C3=B6=C3=BC=C3=9F=0D
>=

----==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c01_75182aafbd794f547430--

----==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c51_75182aafbd794f5475f5
Content-Type: text/calendar;
 charset=UTF-8;
 filename=schedule.ics
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename=schedule.ics

content_file1_normally_should_be_an_ics_calendar_file
----==_mimepart_5c8e2cb226c51_75182aafbd794f5475f5--

Is the email produced using mail 2.7.1 still within specifications when though the attachment does not have a Content-ID field? Mũeller (talk) 12:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The state of the Blender

I need to draw a project that at the first glance is what the Blender software (Blender.org v. 2.78) supposed to be for. However some careful reading reveals unexpected problems. The Blender forums [3] are read only now and the latest post is from 2013. The software is of Dutch origin. What is the state of Blender now? Is there any replacement?

I tried to use brute force to draw figures but it did not work so far.

Any information will be highly appreciated. Thanks, AboutFace 22 (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should start with Blender_(software)#Development. Software development is rarely carried out via forums! Henry ^Flower 15:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]