Wikipedia:Peer review/Post-classical history/archive1

Post-classical history

Greetings, I am the user Sunriseshore, I have worked on this article for approximately seven weeks, when I began the article looked like this, [1] This article prior to that point had been much larger but problematic as it was competing with articles with its content. On Wikipedia due to the widespread tendency of 'Medieval History' to mean 'European Middle Ages' there was much confusion for what this article was meant to do. Using World History sources (and some regional ones) I have attempted to create a proper summary of the 400-1450 period in world history that would meet Wikipedia and professional standards. I must also thank the User:GreenC for his advice on fixing this article.

In the mean time, some more pictures, or even sound files (if appropriate) may be added, there may also be new sources/information as well. However the bulk of the article has been established. I encourage you to go over this article as thoroughly as you can to make sure it avoid problems such as Content Fork, and Original Research. Please give any suggestions you may have and be as detailed as possible. I hope to make this article the best it can be, an a positive example for other world history articles.

There was a also a previous peer-review of this article before but that was done long before the changes made here, and I could also not locate where the peer review had been archived. The template that addresses the old review simply links back here, if someone can find the old peer review please make a note of that here.

Thanks, Sunriseshore (talk) 03:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)