Wikipedia:Peer review/Macau/archive1
I've listed this article for peer review before submitting again for FAC because this article failed to become an FA article from the last nomination. I have already tried my best to improve many aspects according to the comment given by last FAC. Please give me opinion/comment so that I can improve the article promptly. Thanks! Coloane 00:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 19:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The red links should be fixed. Also, I find some of the images unnecessary to the topic (some of the tourism-related photos are place outside of tourism). You can refer to New York City. -- Starczamora (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply - Which tourism-related photos are place outside of tourism and unnecessary(e.g. Macau Tower?, Sands Casino?)? can you specifically point them out so that I can remove them right away? as for red links that you mentioned, I think these links are not related to the improvement of this article. Coloane (talk) 21:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply - The photos of Lotus Square and Ruins of Saint Paul seem out of place in relation to the section they are posted IMO. Starczamora (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed - I tried to put these photos that you mentioned to the sections of tourism and culture. As for the photo of Ruins of Saint Paul, it seems to me that it is closely related to the section of culture as the ruins was the front door of Saint Paul. Coloane (talk) 02:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply - The photos of Lotus Square and Ruins of Saint Paul seem out of place in relation to the section they are posted IMO. Starczamora (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Reply - Which tourism-related photos are place outside of tourism and unnecessary(e.g. Macau Tower?, Sands Casino?)? can you specifically point them out so that I can remove them right away? as for red links that you mentioned, I think these links are not related to the improvement of this article. Coloane (talk) 21:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The red links should be fixed. Also, I find some of the images unnecessary to the topic (some of the tourism-related photos are place outside of tourism). You can refer to New York City. -- Starczamora (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)