Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Reborn! chapters/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because to see if it needs some copy-edit or some parts need to be easier to understand.
Thanks, Tintor2 (talk) 13:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- If chapters are referred to as "Targets", why is this not reflected in the chapter list? I did this with Tramps Like Us, where chapters are "Rules". Could "one hundred and ninety-five" be 195 per WP:MOSNUM? -Malkinann (talk) 22:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers. Another thing you might want to look at is your use of commas - one sentence, one idea! -Malkinann (talk) 22:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from Collectonian (talk · contribs)
- "This article shows the chapters of the manga series" - FLC no longer likes lists to have things like that. Would recommend just saying something like "The manga series Reborn!, written and illustrated by Akira Amano, is comprised of X chapters—called "Targets"."
- The first two sentences of the second paragraph should be in the first paragraph before the plot summary. The sentence on the anime can go after the licensing.
- The sources need clean up as they have excessive stuff in the title. For example:
- {{cite web|url=http://books.shueisha.co.jp/CGI/search/syousai_put.cgi?isbn_cd=4-08-873680-X&mode=1|title=家庭教師ヒットマンREBORN!/1|天野 明|ジャンプコミックス|BOOKNAVI|集英社|publisher=[[Shueisha]]|accessdate=2007-11-22|language=Japanese}}
- should be
- {{cite web |url=http://books.shueisha.co.jp/CGI/search/syousai_put.cgi?isbn_cd=4-08-873680-X&mode=1|title=家庭教師ヒットマンREBORN!/1 |publisher=[[Shueisha]] |accessdate=2007-11-22 |language=Japanese}}
- The Amazon refs need clean up - should not have the referer part or other excess
- I'm not sure about using flagicons for the titles, but can't think of a better way to handle it.
- The ELs section is probably unnecessary; the first two repeat the references and the ANN doesn't add extra content beyond that (if kept, the English tags are unnecessary)
- Other than that, a general copy edit and should be good to go for FLC.
Hope that helps. :) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. It seems the user Darkangel made some things you said.Tintor2 (talk) 14:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment You might want to read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (icons). Right now the flags are without the country name. I would actually just name the country and remove the flags from the article per the same guideline. Garion96 (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)