Wikipedia:Peer review/Eric Easton/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
This is an obscure chap, co-manager of the Rolling Stones with Andrew Loog Oldham but until now without an article. I mean, he was obscure, but not that obscure. Anyway, since this is slightly off my usual FAC tour, I'd like to throw it open to more eyes, particularly regarding chronology, background/context, MOS issues (particularly wrt music) and any good sourcing I've missed. Let's, as they say, spend some time together. Cheers! ——SN54129 19:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
A few things:
- I would like to see page numbers for refs 5, 23, 33, 43, 62, and 90
- There are quite a few red links in the Career with The Rolling Stones section. Are they article-worthy or should they not be there?
- This article doesn't have an infobox.
- The first 2-3 lines of the Musical Context section are unsourced
Overall, this article is well-sourced (excluding earlier mentions). I would say to make sure the article doesn't go into too much detail (The article's prose size is approaching 40kB, not too long but definitely long). Username6892 05:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: Have you seen this? --TheSandDoctor Talk 04:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: I thank you, no I must've missed this. Why, did you want to close it? ——SN54129 08:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: Nope, not at all. I just came across this through your comment on Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject The Rolling Stones and saw that this discussion seems to have stalled. Thought I'd ping you in case you missed it. --TheSandDoctor Talk 19:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: I thank you, no I must've missed this. Why, did you want to close it? ——SN54129 08:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)