Wikipedia:Peer review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it was recommended at the failed Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive2. When it was demoted at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Campbell's Soup Cans/archive1 the review mentioned both "unattributed opinion" and "uncited text" as well as MOS concerns. Please point out any remaining problems from either of those two reviews and help me address them. I believe I have addressed the image issues.
Thanks, TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
P.S. Be advised that I intend to pursue WP:GA, WP:DYK and WP:FA for this article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- I am reverting User:TheWikiToby's closure.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please note that Wikipedia:Peer review/Review closure policy had been incorrectly closed due to a misinterpretation of the inactive discussion rules. An inactive discussion, is one in which a review has begun and received some feedback and the subsequent discourse has become inactive. It is not a review with no feedback. There is a separate set of rules regarding limits for articles hoping for feedback. WP:PR has a noticeboard for reviews that have had no feedback for a long time (well over a month).-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Query from Z1720
[edit]@TonyTheTiger: This has been open for quite a long time without comment. Can this be closed and nominated to WP:FAC, or are you still looking for feedback? Z1720 (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'd prefer feedback. No hurry for FAC.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I know the article is long and detailed, but that probably means there is a lot to improve. I'd rather wait another 7 months than go to FAC. Ping me in another 7 months if it still has not been reviewed.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: The longer a PR stays open, the less likely it is to get comments. Also, it has been difficult for some PRs to get feedback, especially ones that are to go to FAC or are as long as this article. I am also aware of the fact that this PR should have closed when it was nominated for GAN a couple months ago, per the instructions, step 4. If you want to keep this open, I suggest that you post a request on the Wikiprojects attached to this article to see if anyone would like to leave feedback. Bringing it to FAC might also generate feedback on how to improve the article, even if it is unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am in the busy season for my work. A FAC is a big commitment.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: This has been open since October. Are you still looking for comments? Z1720 (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- If I can get em. I'm not that active during my busy season, so I might as well sit on this. I checked out a bunch of books on the subject from the Chicago Public Library and have now renewed them for the 15th and final time (due August 27). Still hoping for feedback while I still have all the sources.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: This has been open since October. Are you still looking for comments? Z1720 (talk) 17:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I am in the busy season for my work. A FAC is a big commitment.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: The longer a PR stays open, the less likely it is to get comments. Also, it has been difficult for some PRs to get feedback, especially ones that are to go to FAC or are as long as this article. I am also aware of the fact that this PR should have closed when it was nominated for GAN a couple months ago, per the instructions, step 4. If you want to keep this open, I suggest that you post a request on the Wikiprojects attached to this article to see if anyone would like to leave feedback. Bringing it to FAC might also generate feedback on how to improve the article, even if it is unsuccessful. Z1720 (talk) 18:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- This nomination is approaching 11 months since it was opened. TonyTheTiger and David Fuchs, what's the status of this review? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments by David Fuchs
[edit]I'll take a look at the article and the past FACs and try and start giving feedback in the next week or two. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 20:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- CPL let me turn in the books I used during the 2023 update and check them back out starting a new 15 cycle renewal countdown. So I have the books.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)