Talk:Campbell's Soup Cans
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Campbell's Soup Cans article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
Campbell's Soup Cans is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Campbell's Soup Cans has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 10, 2007. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Dhtwiki, Does GOCE used T:AH anymore?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am just going to add it.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: That's not a template that I've ever used, although I'm vaguely aware of its existence. Its alternative use was once suggested by people who felt our regular GOCE template was too verbose, garish, or intrusive (feelings since mollified somewhat by our trimming it considerably). I'm glad you've let our template stand, while adding a mention of the copy edit to the article history template, as I seek the former out when I return to pages on my watchlist when I'm unsure of my copy editing involvement. Dhtwiki (talk) 06:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- User:Dhtwiki, I am a proponent of liberal use of project templates.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- @TonyTheTiger: That's not a template that I've ever used, although I'm vaguely aware of its existence. Its alternative use was once suggested by people who felt our regular GOCE template was too verbose, garish, or intrusive (feelings since mollified somewhat by our trimming it considerably). I'm glad you've let our template stand, while adding a mention of the copy edit to the article history template, as I seek the former out when I return to pages on my watchlist when I'm unsure of my copy editing involvement. Dhtwiki (talk) 06:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 20:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Campbell's Soup Cans refers to an Andy Warhol (pictured) painting series and a half dozen other series?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Baldwin V of Jerusalem
- Comment: 3rd of 4 QPQs for this nomination
Improved to Good Article status by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 00:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Campbell's Soup Cans; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Do the characters in the phrase "(pictured)" count toward the character limit?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 00:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I would suggest not running this until at least February and maybe March or April since Campbell's Soup I ran in October and Campbell's Soup Cans II ran last week.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- There is a bit of controversy surrounding the better (unobstructed) image. Basically, we have one image of verified copyfree status and a better one with dubious copyfree status Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Double_checking_validity_of_Andy_Warhol_image_content.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- ALT 1 ... that Campbell's Soup Cans refers to a 32-painting series and several other series, all by Andy Warhol (pictured)?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- ALT 2 ... that Campbell Soup considered suing Andy Warhol (pictured) for his Campbell's Soup Cans theme, but then promoted it?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 04:54, December 29, 2023 (UTC)-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:56, 29 December 2023 (UTC
- ALT 3 ... that Cornell football uniforms inspired the labels Andy Warhol (pictured) based Campbell's Soup Cans on?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- ALT 4 ... that Campbell Soup promoted a Campbell's Soup Cans themed dress that could be purchased for $1 in 1967?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Promoted to GA within 7 days of nomination. Good article about an important work, plenty long enough, neutral, and well-cited. Earwig bitches about potential copyright violations but flags only some long quotes that are necessary to establish necessary context over the work's provenance, so I'm choosing to ignore it. ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch IMO; I have access to ProQuest and the fact checks out. ALT4 is technically incorrect as the dress required proof of purchase of two cans in addition to the $1. ALT0 and ALT1 should be struck; I think everyone and their grandmother associates Warhold with the cans at this point. I have also gone ahead and italicized all instances of Campbell's Soup Cans in the hooks, as it is the title of a creative work. DigitalIceAge (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Keeping track of discussions for next FAC
[edit]- Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2023/October#FUR_issues_at_Campbell's_Soup_Cans
- Commons:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/10#Additional_images_at_w:Campbell's_Soup_Cans
- Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:TAG Andy Warhol Soup Can 02.jpg
- Commons:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/11#Another_Campbell's_Soup_Cans_image_issue
- Commons:Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Double_checking_validity_of_Andy_Warhol_image_content
- Plus there was a WP:GOCE.
TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class Museum of Modern Art-related articles
- High-importance Museum of Modern Art-related articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class visual arts articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles