Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 December 2
< December 1 | December 3 > |
---|
December 2
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, low quality, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0029_.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Johnfullerton (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, recently absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0031bb.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Teehornghean (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:HPIM0292.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Teehornghean (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by Thingg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, minimal encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0061.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cjcamarillo (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, minimal encyclopedic use -- unremarkable farm land Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0067.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blackinktelecom (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, current image (two others in history) was likely used on a deleted article on the band, other two images are unremarkable Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0094_Inkstone.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iwanafish (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine a use, I question the PD-self license given the uploader states in the summary "fair use" but give no source Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0101.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Montrose_Patriot (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG-_0108.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cjcamarillo (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, insufficent information provided to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/move to commons it is this church in Camarillo, California. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0115.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gvarma.biomed (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sufficient quality, image is of Kudremukh.[1]. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Phil_crampton.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Philcrampton (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0151_2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dreemykreem (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Img_0163.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Trotteleiner (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, minimal encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0165.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gvarma.biomed (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:IMG_0166.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kingofiowa (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's Frank Hurtte according to his name tag. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, questionable PD-self given website address watermark Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, questionable PD-self license given the webaddress watermarking Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:1524AstorChicago.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jennifer Ames (notify | contribs).
- UE per WP:COI, image of property represented by uploader, see [2] Ronnotel (talk) 02:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Hot_Wheels_006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karrmann (notify | contribs).
- Copyright violation - Derivative work MER-C 06:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 15:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Majorette_Cars.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hotwheels53 (notify | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Hot_Wheels_006_cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hotwheels53 (notify | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:ScreamerWheels.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HotWheels53 (notify | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:31 lg.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wee-man-2-kaii-8 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:43rd district.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marylandstater (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, blurred/illegible, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- no objection--«Marylandstater» «reply» 21:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:7420645.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Professortruth (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic, absent uploader Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic, absent uploader Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:AlbatossSMB2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kaibaman Soldier (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Album EastofEden Small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SynthesizedShredder (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic - copyright "pending"? Skier Dude (talk) 06:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Album EastofEden.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SynthesizedShredder (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:AllysonStars.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jurassictimes (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Anipanther.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Simooligan (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Apple.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Islaammaged126 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 06:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Korean,Japanese,Chinese.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Byeonggwan (notify | contribs).
- No source information or explanation of what the image is meant to illustrate; discussion at Talk:Hangul#Japanese and Korean has revealed that the information presented in the image is misleading. —Politizer talk/contribs 07:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The summary claims this shows the origin of hangul, and it is complete nonsense. It's just a bunch of random resemblances, without even bothering with the sound values. kwami (talk) 07:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Politizer and Kwamikagami. It must be deleted because no one thinks Hangul is from kana or Chinese characters and there are no evidences that support Hangul is from them either, at all. This isn't like Origin of Hangul#Ledyard's theory of consonant letters. -- (talk) 22:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Korean,Japanese,Chinese1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Byeonggwan (notify | contribs).
- No source information or explanation of what the image is meant to illustrate; discussion at Talk:Hangul#Japanese and Korean has revealed that the information presented in the image is misleading. —Politizer talk/contribs 07:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The summary claims this shows the origin of hangul, and it is complete nonsense. It's just a bunch of random resemblances, without even bothering with the sound values. kwami (talk) 07:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Politizer and Kwamikagami. It must be deleted because no one thinks Hangul is from kana or Chinese characters and there are no evidences that support Hangul is from them either, at all. This isn't like Origin of Hangul#Ledyard's theory of consonant letters. -- (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Zubahgat.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahmedrefat (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unidentified subject Skier Dude (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, not used in relation to Stargate articles Skier Dude (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, UE, apparently designed for non-created user page Skier Dude (talk) 07:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Zgunesam.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ahmedrefat (notify | contribs).
- orphaned image, subject not identified Skier Dude (talk) 07:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, not used in any Stargate-related articles Skier Dude (talk) 07:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unidentified subject Skier Dude (talk) 07:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned image, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 07:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:WikiProject Films Oscar.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bugs5382 (notify | contribs).
- unused icon for films project, superseded by Image:Film_Oscar.svg Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, blurred image(s), un-encyclopaedic (nominating all revisions) Skier Dude (talk) 07:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Washroom handmade in paint.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allanvs (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic, absent uploader Skier Dude (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Ug0ad243iu2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bluexviolets (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic, absent uploader Skier Dude (talk) 07:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic, too blurred/small to identify subject Skier Dude (talk) 07:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Tropical storm.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dollytheledge (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic Skier Dude (talk) 07:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Traveling Bloodcells.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cosmospeedway (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, un-encyclopaedic, not enough context / info to identify subject Skier Dude (talk) 07:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jon3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DrStrangedlove (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned personal photo. OsamaK 08:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Various images from Bomb the Bass
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Images fail WP:NFCC#8. The commentary provided to support the images is unreferenced making it either point-of view or original research. The images may garner reconsideration if reliable sources are cited to support the text about the images. -Nv8200p talk 20:00, 16 December 2008 (UTC) This listing encompasses the following images:[reply]
- Image:Nme btb (corrected 2).jpg
- Image:Beat Dis - smileycover.jpg
- Image:Winter in july CD single.jpg
- Image:Bugpowderdustsinglesleeve.jpg
- Image:Bomb The Bass - clearcut sleeve.jpg
All were uploaded by User:Saint08 who has been notified.
I am nominating them for deletion as they appear to fail WP:NFCC#8, inter alia — they do not add significantly to readers' understanding of the topic and their omission would not be detrimental to that understanding; they are used only for illustration. Also, album covers should only be used in the article about the album and magazine covers should only be used in the article about the magazine. Stifle (talk) 11:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is that really policy? I understand maybe five images are excessive, but isn't deleting them rather counter-productive? Doesn't this go against the archival purposes of wikipedia? Es-won (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia has no restrictions on free content and indeed aims to be a free encyclopedia. However, non-free content is subject to the non-free content criteria and Wikipedia is not intended to be an archive of non-free content. Stifle (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom, I share a similar view on this, unless the article establishes a need for the image, then fair use images should be avoided. — Realist2 16:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the argument that these images do not add to the article is double-sided; to remove them does not improve the article, but merely adheres to a rule that is flexible in the first instance. I've looked at the page, and I can't work out why some images have been marked for removal and not others. My principle argument for retaining the NME cover is threefold: this magazine cover is historically significant in that (a) it marks the point of sea change when the UK's more critically reverred music paper suddenly got behind the swiftly emerging style soon to be known as Dance music. By featuring a relative unknown on the cover - in this instance, Bomb the Bass - they not only catipulted the band into an area of significant importance, but (b) the use of the term DJ CULTURE in the headline inspired the use of what is now a globally recognised term. For a band such as Bomb the Bass to inspire this kind of media response was relatively unknown in the late 80s... but has become common place now. Therefore, the inclusion of the NME cover is the actual pictoral representation of a visual medium in an instance where it is less effective NOT to show it. As the cliche says, a picture is worth a thousand words; therefore, to include the image alongside its inclusion in the text actually gives viable credence to the facts in question. To say it should be deleted, when the very thing in question is a visual item, is to say that merely discussing the existsnce of a visual item is as powerful as actually showing it - which is a flawed argument. I would argue that to remove it for the sake of it is to deny the importance of historical record. And to also argue that the policy is to only feature album covers in articles about albums, and ditto magazine covers in articles about magazines is to therefore say you should not show a newspaper headline for the start or end of a major war, and/or a globally significant event, such as the assassination of someone like JFK; and, furthermore, to say that these might be important and therefore significant, whereas a music-related cover is not - or cannot be significant - is a matter of subjective, and therefore personal, taste.
Similarly to remove the cover of Beat Dis is counter-productive: the text discusses the fact that the band's influence went beyond the actual nature of their music, by the fact that the inclusion of the 'smiley' logo subsequently became the icon of a global music scene that, for (arguably) a decade was the dominant musical genre. To insist on NOT showing the sleeve, and solely relying on the text to conjure the image in the minds of the readers of this page is to essentially deny the benefit of a sensory response that is openly available here: namely, to see the sleeve in the context of the factual discussion. To say it is merely ILLUSTRATION could be applied to the use of any or all images on wikipedia: The Beatles need not have a photo of them on their page, any discussion of Sgt Pepper need not show the Peter Blake cover, because they are discussed in words anyway - which is your argument for deletion here. Why does anyone need to know what Queen Elizabeth II looks like when the text on her page tells how/when and why she is important? Again, these are all subjective arguments, but they show that the inclusion of images is valid, and generally an advantage rather than a disadvantage. I would argue that the statement that these images do not aid the piece in question is without merit, on the basis of everything I've said here.
Ditto, why is the image for the Butterfingers video being deleted, whereas the image from the Fuzzbox clip is not? Is this, again, surely not a case of someone imposing a subjective opinion on a page that functions perfectly well within the context of the text and its associated images? If anything, it is valid to highlight how certain artists will use images to promote themselves. Specifically, the Butterfingers promo, which was released in the contemporary form of an internet movie, rather than a television promo was isntrumental in drawing significant attention to the attendant song. A considerable number of internet sites from around the globe reviewed the video, often on the basis of its strong visual, rather than the actual song. Therefore, I would argue in this instance that it is valid to include a representation of the video - in this case a still from it - because it shows the uninitiated what the film looked like without them having to go to the trouble of further research. Wikipedia is a contemporary encyclopedia that has the potential to evolve the perceived notion of what such a 'book' can contain. There is no yardstick or rule of thumb that suggests one, two or three images are valid, whereas anything above and beyond that number is WRONG. Recalling my comment about the curious, potentially non-sensical call to strike the Butterfingers image, but not the Fuzzbox one, I would put it, with respect, that the editing of this page is being done from a position of not knowing the subject, and therefore to impose such a subjective view on the page without fully understanding why someone has thought the images important is perhaps more heinous than your suggestion that the included images are merely frivolous decoration. Whilst I applaud your efforts to edit pages and maintain a standard, I would wager that what is actually in operation here is a very heavy handed case of one will subjecting over the many. The page has been like this for quite some time now, and no one else has lodged the same complaint.
Arguably you could say that none of the sleeve images need to be removed because they are visual 'bookmarks' or anchors to key releases by the band, and discussed along the page. To refer back to my previous suggestion: why do we have any images on wikipedia at all? To which I would put forward the argument: because they deliver information in a more direct, and easy to grasp medium than expending more and more words to discuss the existence of a visual item that apparently we are not supposed to be able to see. The sleeve for the Winter in July CD is important because it shows the two core members of the band, where no other illustration of them is freely available; and ditto the sleeve of Bug Powder Dust contains visual references to William Burroughs and his novel Naked Lunch, which would be lost if we removed the sleeve image. To therefore go back into the text once the image has been deleted and waste more space woth words describing the nature of the sleeve is an odd sense of word to image bias. Again, a picture is worth a thousand words; and in the absence of a picture, a thousand words need to be used. SAINT08
(Saint08 (talk) 22:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- I think you're missing the key point here. That is that Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia. If the images were free (i.e. in the public domain or under a free license) then there would be no problem including as many as would fit. However, they aren't. The non-free content policy is not negotiable. Stifle (talk) 18:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to make this a personal issue, but I'm not missing the point; I've used Fair Use in many television programmes I've made for UK TV and I know the purpose and the parameters of the law - and the purpose for creating this loophole. However, my points are valid: in historical context (NME cover), fair use is valid; in examples of work (the various singles sleeves I've noted in my reply to your original post) their inclusion is also valid. I also think my counter argument that these images DO add to the page, and to remove them does not in essence add back or re-dress any issues of worthiness is also valid. I may have not included the exact details on the original WIKI input forms, but that is only because I am relatively new to adding such contextual work to Wikipedia - and do think that wikipedia is overly complex sometimes, what with all its pages within pages, within other pages. Nobody is trying to hijack images here that belong under copyright to someone else, nor am I willfully trying to break laws for the sake of it. What I am trying to do is lodge valid points for NOT deleting them. To be honest I don't want this to descend into an argument just to prove who is the most right, as I can see both sides. However, I think that it is necessary to accept - with the greatest humility intended - that music in the modern pop context is as much about the visuals as it is the notes and the gaps in between. To remove images from a page about a pop music collective, such as Bomb the Bass, is to remove from view some of the key points that made them, and retain them, as historically significant enough to be recorded here in the first place. Therefore, I call back my original counter-arguments about deletion, and put it to you that these points are within the EXACT reason why the FAIR USE law has remained as a valid law. We may not be talking about journalists 'breaking' the Watergate affair here, but Fair Use as a law is valid as long as there is context to the item under review's inclusion; and in this case, the majority of images that you have down-valued as mere illustration are discussed within the body of the copy, and were included as visual devices to support those facts. (Saint08 (talk) 14:40, 6 December 2008 (UTC)) User:Saint08[reply]
- Wikipedia's non-free content policy is deliberately narrower than what the law allows, simple as that. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Fails WP:NFCC#8. Image is merely illustrative of Mr. larson and his total. There is no supported critical commentary on the image itself. -Nv8200p talk 15:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Michael Larson 110237.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Darijoe (notify | contribs).
- Image fails WP:NFCC#8 in the context of its use in American game show winnings records as it is used only to illustrate. Speedy was declined. Stifle (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I see no NFCC8 problem here, his Press Your Luck record was a notable feat for daytime television. ViperSnake151 14:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I absolutely agree. But what would readers lose if they couldn't see a picture of Mr. Larson (which is replaceable anyway), a Whammy icon, and the number 110237? Stifle (talk) 09:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, The image is legit to stay.--70.240.233.234 (talk) 01:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Chris[reply]
- Delete People don't need to see a picture of him to understand American game show winnings records. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:CollageFaces.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Redthoreau (notify | contribs).
- Non-transformative use indicates harm to commecial opportunities: Our stated purpose for using this image, "To display the vast "mutation" and "variation" of Che's image.", is exactly the same purpose as that of the source book's author and publisher (ISBN 0810957183). Damiens.rf 11:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails NFCC#2. Stifle (talk) 11:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (but disagree). The author of that book is not the copyright holder of the images and is using them under fair use as well. The only thing we are borrowing of his/hers is the arrangement and selection of the posters. I don't think that this probably rises to the level of a NFCC2 violation, but I think it fails WP:NFCC3 because we could use far fewer posters and still get the point across (though this is "one" image it is a collage of many more). Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Damiens is being disingenuous and simply trying to harass in response to us edit warring. The image is clearly helpful to the readers understanding of how the image has been used and transformed across various uses. Redthoreau (talk) RT 14:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Failure of NFCC 2 and 3, the article is not about the specific arrangement of those posters, and 6x7 images is too many for Fair use. ViperSnake151 14:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- : Am I to understand from the above responses of Cali & Viper that if I lessen the # of included photos, that it would be acceptable? If so, then I would be more than happy to do so ? Redthoreau (talk) RT 13:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It isn't just the fact there's 42 individual images here. It's also the fact that there's no source for all 42 images, but the book it was published in...which is blatantly insufficient. We need the authors of all 42 images before this image can even be considered for keeping. Yes, the original photo of him is the one that is the basis of these 42. But, the artists who made the transformations also have rights, and they must...must...be properly identified. Blatant misuse until that can be rectified. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:NFCC#2 and WP:NFCC#10a (as discussed). — pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. SoWhy 12:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Bunnymen cutter vid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JD554 (notify | contribs).
- Image lacks a fair use rationale specific to the article in which it is used, and is used only for decoration within that article. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: There clearly is a fair use rationale on that image which addresses all the points at WP:NFCC. Point 8 specifically says that the image is "facilitating critical commentary as it provides an immediate relevance to the reader more capably than the textual description alone". It is not used for decoration. --JD554 (talk) 11:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is used in violation of WP:NFCC#8 as it is used only for decoration and does not aid readers' understanding of the topic. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- superseded by Image:Trie example.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No argument from me, a good SVG is always better. Dcoetzee 18:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I5 by East718 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:SColfax_statue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Centpacrr (notify | contribs).
- photo of statue, no freedom of panorama in us, no information on when this statue was put up Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I personally took this digital photograph of the statue of Vice President Colfax in August, 2003, and uploaded it to Wikipedia in January, 2007. What case are you making that it should be deleted? I don't understand what you mean by "no freedom of panorama in us" or why whatever that is constitutes a problem. I also do not know exactly when the statue was erected (although I believe that it is within the last 25 years), but I don't remotely see what difference that would possibly make. The statue is located at the AMTRAK station in Colfax, CA, a town in the Sierras on the origianl CPRR railroad grade between Sacramento and Reno named after this American politician who was also involved in promoting the construction of the First Transcontinental Railroad next to which it stands. The image is linked to three appropriate pages on Wikipedia that relate to VP Colfax, the town named after him, and the railroad station there. What exactly is your issue with this image which has been on Wikipedia for almost two years? (Centpacrr (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]
The issue is that the sculptor holds the copyright to his artwork. In the US, there is no "freedom of panorama", which in some countries allows photographers to be able to freely use photos of art in public places. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Concur with Calliopejen1. The statue was erected in 2002. See [3] and text search for "erected in 2002". Therefore, the statue is not old enough to be in the public domain by way of age. The artist holds copyright to the statue. By law in the United States, artists of 3d works of art hold rights to derivative works of their work, including photographs. Therefore, this image is fair use only, and not public domain. I've retagged the image appropriately, and tagged it as missing a fair use rationale. Centpacrr; sorry you're learning this quirk of law, but it is law. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Explain then, please, how this image is different than those on Wikipedia of other examples of public statuary such as the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial or National World War II Memorial erected more recently which have not been challenged as potentially violative of alleged "freedom of panorama" copyright issues. (Centpacrr (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Be careful of using arguments inline with WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The quick answer to this is those images haven't been challenged yet. The more thorough answer is at least in the case of the FDR memorial, those works are property of the United States Government and therefore in the public domain. One of the images on the FDR memorial page notes this on the image description page. At a guess, this applies to the WWII memorial as well. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Explain then, please, how this image is different than those on Wikipedia of other examples of public statuary such as the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial or National World War II Memorial erected more recently which have not been challenged as potentially violative of alleged "freedom of panorama" copyright issues. (Centpacrr (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- While I can find nothing at all inappropriate about my asking for an explanation of a seeming inconsistency in the arbitrary application of a somewhat vague policy, I believe that I am just going to let my image of this public statue which I posted in good faith almost two years ago for educational, informational, and non-commercial purposes to just fade away much the way Mr. Colfax himself did when he was denied a second term as Vice President in 1872 owing to his unfortunate involvement in the Crédit Mobilier unpleasantness. (Centpacrr (talk) 04:21, 6 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- There is nothing inappropriate about your asking for an explanation. That's an entirely normal and proper way of handling this. The policy isn't vague. If a statue exists in the United States, and it is not in the public domain either by declaration, ownership by the U.S. federal government, age, or any other mechanism, then the copyright holders retain rights to derivative works. This includes photography of said statue. The statue in question is not old enough to be in the public domain, and there's no evidence that the copyright holders have released their rights. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, unsourced, we have better images of Schuyler Colfax already Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Seglea (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:25, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:SnowyEgretWinter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seglea (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Egretta_thula Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- transferred to Commons for reasons explained on talk page there seglea (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Wikipedia-articles.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pcollison (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, outdated Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Low quality, unverifiable source Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Wpdms_nasa_topo_olympic_peninsula.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, base map source is not verifiable Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Wpdms_nasa_topo_central_valley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, base map source is not verifiable Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Wpdms_nasa_topo_willamette_valley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, base map source is not verifiable Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Columbusroutes.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andre_Engels (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality, superseded by http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Christopher_Columbus_voyages.gif Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- original source deadlinks. probably PD by age but no way to verify. also Orphaned and Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Cetacea_range_map_Blue_Whale_2.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pcb21 (notify | contribs).
- superseded by [4] Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Map_of_USA_Locator_GrandCanyon.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lorax (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality, unneeded Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:M109.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RadicalBender (notify | contribs).
- unverifiable source Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Feijoablossom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, Low quality, we now have better http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Feijoa_sellowiana Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:MainPage-w3m-brion.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brion_VIBBER (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unneeded Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh? That's not a deletion reason. And is there another image that shows this information? --MZMcBride (talk) 22:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anything reasonable is a an acceptable deletion reason. Why are we keeping this? Is there any reason a Wikipedia main page screen shot in w3m console browser (80x50) from 2004 could ever be of use? Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Wpdms_nasa_topo_black_hills.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, source for base map is unverifiable Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Mukhda1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Syed_Atif_Nazir (notify | contribs).
- orphaned wikipedian photo[5] Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. SoWhy 12:24, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Fordstheater.jpe (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kingturtle (notify | contribs).
- supposedly from nara, but i can't find it there Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this image in good faith from here. According to their page on Using the Collection, "All images are strongly believed to be in the public domain. They were obtained from non-copyrighted U.S. government holdings and publications and from published works with clearly expired copyrights. Thus there are absolutely no restrictions on their use." Kingturtle (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Ellison_ralph.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SouthernNights (notify | contribs).
- just being published on the LOC website doesn't make something PD. the LOC sources it to NARA, but I can't find this image at NARA. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: maybe this could be kept and tagged non-free. The image currently in the Ralph Ellison article is a version of this image at the commons, which I have also nominated for deletion. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The image should be kept. The image was used as part of a LOC Federal Writers Project display, with the copyright information spelled out here. Before I uploaded the image, I contacted the LOC to double check and was told all the images in this presentation were in the public domain, with most taken from the National Archives. Pay particular attention to the use of the term "documents" to refer to the works in the display. This term means it covers both the images and the writing samples. In short, this image is in the public domain.--SouthernNights (talk) 01:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That refers to the collection "Documents from the Folklore Project, Federal Writers' Project, 1936-1940". This is a photo dated 1961, clearly not a part of that project. In fact this photo is a part of this project, which is marked (c)1980 though the author doesn't hold the copyright to this photo. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's why I had contacted the LOC, to verify is the photo was covered. I was told all the images in the display were in the public domain, with the Ellison image being taken from the National Archives. --SouthernNights (talk) 01:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A bit more info from my research: those numbers on the LOC page don't seem very helpful and pull up nothing in the ARC search function. This site and this site give a bit of info about the 306 number, but it doesn't appear that that collection has been digitized (?). Also I can't find any info anywhere about the copyright status of that 306 collection. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't help you there. But based on the research I did before uploading the photo, it appears to be safely in the public domain. Best,--SouthernNights (talk) 01:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just emailed NARA, who would be the people to ask about this photo. We'll see if I hear back. If this photo is deleted and I get an email response afterward indicating that it's ok I can undelete it and forward the message to OTRS. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I heard back, and they say it's PD and told me who the creator was and its reference number etc. I'll go ahead and delete this local copy though, because of the high-res version that exists on the commons. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just emailed NARA, who would be the people to ask about this photo. We'll see if I hear back. If this photo is deleted and I get an email response afterward indicating that it's ok I can undelete it and forward the message to OTRS. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't help you there. But based on the research I did before uploading the photo, it appears to be safely in the public domain. Best,--SouthernNights (talk) 01:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Russianskinheads.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sosomk (notify | contribs).
- simply appearing on the library of congress site does not make an image PD. this photo was taken in 2000. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Leadbelly_with_his_Guitar2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kschwerdt514 (notify | contribs).
- supposedly from the LOC, but I can't find it anywhere on their website Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:18EU-map-realistic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JTamplin (notify | contribs).
- This couldn't be public domain or fair use, as it's entirely an image of a copyrighted game board. So, it becomes unused fair use. rootology (C)(T) 15:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 15:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Yellow_Ribbon.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thunderstix33 (notify | contribs).
- whether this comes from the LOC or from a senator's website (it's unclear what the source is here), it's likely they got it from a clip art library and didn't design it themselves Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 14:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:00001a.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PNG_crusade_bot (notify | contribs).
- supposedly from LOC/Dept of the Interior but I can't find this photo on the LOC website, and since it's a state park it's unlikely that this blueprint was drawn by the federal govt\ Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 14:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PD tag says it's from the LOC, which is wrong... the actual source says the photo is from 1926 and gives no reason to believe it's in the public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete -Nv8200p talk 14:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Kangar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew Timbang (notify | contribs).
- "I know someone who knows the photographer" is not a proper licence. Hence no valid verification of Public Domain status. DavidDCM (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Mithie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew Timbang (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, low quality, unencyclopedic personal photo. DavidDCM (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Meethee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew Timbang (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, low quality, unencyclopedic personal photo. DavidDCM (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Stisin5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew Timbang (notify | contribs).
- Low Quality, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (historical landmark?) DavidDCM (talk) 16:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. -Nv8200p talk 14:51, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comes from [6], a Malaysian government site ([7]). And that page says: "Copyright © 2008 Sarikei District Council. All rights reserved" DavidDCM (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Jeanne Calment.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Editorofthewiki (notify | contribs).
- This picture is the same as this one (it was just flipped horizontally and close cut) which is credited to AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS. This is not a work of the United States Federal Government and not on the public domain. Stéphane (talk) 17:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep They are not the same. The AP image of Calment has her in a different vest. Besides, wouldn't the U.S. government tell if they used an image from somewhere else? ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 21:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, they do, sorta. See http://www.nia.nih.gov/Policies.htm#copyright . Basicaly they say there might be copyrighted images on the site, and that since US law doesn't require copyright notices protected material is not nessesarily marked in any way. So if you want to copy anyting you have to figure out for yourself if it's copyrighted or not. Not the most re-user frienly policy... --Sherool (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Still, they are not the same images. ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 23:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- They are the same.
- Here's the picture you uploaded: Image:Jeanne Calment.jpg
- Here's the picture from Associated Press after flipping/cropping/resizing: [8]
- Everything matches: same patterns in her scarf, in her hair, same marks on her skin, same expression on her face. That picture on nia.nih.gov belongs to AP and was not produced by a member of the US government. It is not in the PD. Stéphane (talk) 00:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong. The scarf color in your image is red, and the one I uploaded is yellow. She must have had similar scarfs of different colors. ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 00:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Read the comment below about the colors and look at the rest of the picture: same brown marks between her eyebrows, on her left cheek and left temple, same angle of the head, same facial expression, same scarf (just switch from one pic to the other and you'll see the similarities). The only différences are: background was removed, right hand cut off, colour balance modified. It's a slightly derivated work but it's the same picture. Stéphane (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- They are the same.
- Still, they are not the same images. ~the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 23:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, they do, sorta. See http://www.nia.nih.gov/Policies.htm#copyright . Basicaly they say there might be copyrighted images on the site, and that since US law doesn't require copyright notices protected material is not nessesarily marked in any way. So if you want to copy anyting you have to figure out for yourself if it's copyrighted or not. Not the most re-user frienly policy... --Sherool (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete They're clearly the same, the color balance has simply been adjusted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Questionable enough to raise very reasonable doubt. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Palm Beach Story poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ed Fitzgerald (notify | contribs).
- Replaceable with a smaller version Image:The Palm Beach Story poster.jpg
That non-free media file should be replaced with a smaller version to comply with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and United States copyright law. According to Wikipedia's policy for non-free content, the amount of copyrighted work used under fair use should be as little as possible. In particular, non-free media on Wikipedia should not be usable as substitutes for the original work. -- Britneysaints (talk) 17:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is orphaned so it's not necessary to list it here. As you've reduced the image and reuploaded it with a new file name, this orphaned file with automatically be deleted. Rossrs (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This User:Ed Fitzgerald tends to keep unneeded non-free images, therefore delete it here. -- Britneysaints (talk) 21:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's inappropriate to comment about another editor here in such a way. The image is orphaned and it'll be deleted on that basis without the need for discussion. Orphaned non-free images are automatically deleted. There is no saving them. You've done the right thing in reducing the image size, so please let it go at that. No need to push the point and make it personal. Rossrs (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
However, uploader may re-add this image to the article: see Image:Palm_Beach_Story_poster.jpg#File history. He (or she) said that image sizes should be made to what is appropriate to the situation. -- Britneysaints (talk) 20:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Reuben novel cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rgreenspoon (notify | contribs).
- Unused personal photo. Sherool (talk) 21:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not been used since t he Radio FreeK America articke was PRODed. Sherool (talk) 21:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:Rice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WayeFlawless (notify | contribs).
- Not used, the Notre Dame Law school website doesn't say this image is public domain as far as I can tell. The blurb about free of charge public information per New Jersy law seems to relate to the previous version of the image, however I don't believe that actualy means that image is nessesarily public domain either. Sherool (talk) 22:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.