User talk:Cjcamarillo

Welcome!

Hello, Cjcamarillo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Thank you for adding to the article Greater Los Angeles Area. However, you did not cite your sources, a very important thing for Wikipedia. Please go back and insert where you obtained your information. Without a reference, the section you added may be deleted.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Brien Clark^Talk 19:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:IMG-0110.jpeg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:IMG-0110.jpeg and also as Image:IMG- 0110.jpeg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 08:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Conejo Valley 2.jpeg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Conejo Valley 2.jpeg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

20:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Conejo Valley 1.jpeg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Conejo Valley 1.jpeg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[3][4]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

20:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:The Oaks 1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Oaks 1.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:To3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:To3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 00:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your images

Hi and thanks for your recent edits on Conejo Valley-related articles. Unfortunately, the images you've uploaded for them, while very nice, all fail the first criterion of our non-free content policy. We cannot accept images were we don't know what the licensing status or who the copyright holder is and since these are just buildings, someone can just go and take freely licensed pictures of them. Please stop uploading these images -- it's just creating work for us administrators to go and have to delete them. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 00:10, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For example, the library picture you uploaded today -- I'm going to the library tomorrow so I can actually just take a picture of the building myself. It's also not a product of the U.S. federal government so the licensing template you selected is incorrect. If you have questions about image licensing and copyrights, please don't hesitate to ask me. howcheng {chat} 00:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Thousand_Oaks_Library_3.jpeg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thousand_Oaks_Library_3.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 00:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This goes for all the other images you retrieved from the T.O. web site as well. howcheng {chat} 02:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

noncom

I give up! You were told above about putting the db-noncom tag on uploads. But you do the same thing with Newbury Park images! -- RHaworth 02:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To3.jpg

I have tagged Image:To3.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. howcheng {chat} 22:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westside (Los Angeles County)

We need Sources for the above article. Can you help. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMG-0110.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG-0110.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMG_0061.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0061.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IMG-_0108.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG-_0108.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject, or I happen to know personally).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]