Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 October 15

< October 14	October 16 >

October 15

Image:509Rich-Boy.jpg

Image:509Rich-Boy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Youngbuck8000 (notify | contribs).

orphan, unencyclopedic as far as i can tell, PD tag is clearly incorret Calliopejen1 01:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a copyvio. See http://www.raptalk.net/news/GetRichWithRichBoyInMarchNewAlbum.php (larger version http://www.raptalk.net/images/rich-boy.jpg ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrburke (talk • contribs) 16:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Steamlogo2.png

Image:Steamlogo2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gracz54 (notify | contribs).

This image was used as a flag icon in the infoboxes of several Valve games released via Steam (content delivery). It seems the idea is to match the existing (public domain) flag icons for releases via Steam instead of via retail. This is a purely decorative use that can be easily conveyed with text, and thus fails WP:NFCC#8. It was formerly used in Portal (video game), The Orange Box, Half-Life 2: Episode Two‎, Half-Life: Source, Team Fortress 2, and Half-Life 2: Lost Coast, and I have orphaned the image for the time being. --Phirazo 01:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tyler.gif

Image:Tyler.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mark SM (notify | contribs).

Do i need a reason? Look at it. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 04:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a contribution to a nonsense page. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 04:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously... Thanks, Codelyoko193 _Talk Contributions 21:37, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Uefa super cup logo.svg

Image:Uefa super cup logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xhandler (notify | contribs).

it doesnt seem it can't be rendered to a .png, so useless Chandler talk 12:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate - Image is a near exact duplicate to the eye of the Commons Image:NotreDameAcademyGreenBayWisconsinSign.jpg. Uploader has been disruptive, edit warring over having his/her image placed on the article Notre Dame Academy (Green Bay, Wisconsin). Reason for uploading is a "recent picture" when it is actually equal to the existing image. Possibly the contributor was to leave a message for Shawn. Royalbroil 18:01, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Also Copyright violation: After further review, I believe that this is a derivative work since everything appears to be in the EXACT same location. The shadows, vehicle, and power lines appear to be exactly the same. It looks like Bobbarker1291 has photoshopped a message to his/her friend Shawn. A deriative work would require the same attribution since I tagged the original image "Attribution ShareAlike", not Public Domain. Royalbroil 18:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - The metadata confirms this is a copyright violation. Royalbroil 18:51, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No need for the second image, especially as it's 'faked' making it's value in an encyclopedia less than the original. AlexJ 10:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MKDE_server.png

Image:MKDE_server.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ta_bu_shi_da_yu (notify | contribs).

Orphan, the given source has a copyright statement with no evidence of Creative Commons license. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 18:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not an orphan, a commons image is based on the image I created. Please don't delete it. It is CC-by-SA, what do you mean by "the given source has a copyright statement with no evidence of Creative Commons license"? Why do you believe otherwise? - Ta bu shi da yu 22:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:MKDE server.svg before closing this, just in case that discussion turns around. —Cryptic 18:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- For some reason it's been switched to GFDL on commons. Go figure. - Ta bu shi da yu 22:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Light dress.jpg

Image:Light dress.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Allyn (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, features uploader prominently, vanity 78.149.13.74 18:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Image is of a Radical Faerie in flamboyant dress, as is described in the article:

Informality, acceptance, and flamboyance of dress (and undress) are the norm at gatherings...

Yes, the Faerie in question is an editor, but it is an illustration of a part of the article. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 19:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Radical faeries are widely known for creative attire and this image illustrates that eccentricity and creativity as well as perfectly dovetailing the incorporation of modern technologies into drag aesthetics. Also I personally hope that all uploaders will also be editors and contribute to articles, not sure why that would be a problem. Benjiboi 21:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. illustrates article well, and whether it's of an editor or someone else is irrelevant. Calliopejen1 21:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, licensing problems. The first upload says there's permission to use the photo, but then a subsequent upload's comments try to attach some condition - I can't read it - to the use of the photo. This should therefore be deleted as a 'permission' image. Uploader should re-upload and specifically say in the comments he took the photo and is releasing it under the GFDL as the tag claims. Attaching any permission to it is not compatible with the GFDL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tempshill (talk • contribs) 03:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The rest of the text says "My only requirement is that I be given credit for the photograpth, the model, and the lighted raincoat." -- RG² 01:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - ...which is required to comply with the GFDL anyway. —Cryptic 02:11, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not liking is no reason to delete. If the article monitors want the image, we should not decide to delete. GFDL and harmless. --Knulclunk 03:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- It's a nice illustration of RadFae dress, and as a Radical Faerie, I don't have a problem with the image being used to illustrate the article. For the record, I know the model in the photo who created the outfit. Kevyn 04:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image kept. Free image. Consensus is the image is encyclopedic in the article it is used in in. Sometimes it is necessary to have a person in the image, in this case someone to model the attire. Using the uploader as a model means no model release is necessary and the image is more free to use. -Nv8200p talk 14:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:FDR0415.JPG

Image:FDR0415.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 172 (notify | contribs).

this image is being used to illustrate FDR's "ebullient personality". This is a US president--there should be plenty of free images available! no reason to use this nonfree one. Calliopejen1 19:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:29092007214.jpg

Image:29092007214.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Niral65 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 20:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Big_Cigarette.jpg

Image:Big_Cigarette.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cyr (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 20:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gen_Lue_Ye-tien.jpg

Image:Gen_Lue_Ye-tien.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aldwinteo (notify | contribs).

does not contribute significantly to article (readers would not be harmed by its omission), and probably replaceable - could take this same picture with many subjects Calliopejen1 21:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NoImageYetSquare.png

Image:NoImageYetSquare.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tom Webb (notify | contribs).

Virtually orphaned, low quality, replaced by Image:No image available.svg. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:No image yet

Image:No image yet (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MyRedDice (notify | contribs).

Empty image, virtually orphaned, replaced by the many images in Category:Wikipedia image placeholders. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Noimage.jpg

Image:Noimage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stoosh (notify | contribs).

Virtually orphaned, low quality, replaced by Image:No image available.svg. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:No Screenshot big.jpg

Image:No Screenshot big.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ryan2807 (notify | contribs).

Orphan, obsoleted by Image:No Screenshot.svg. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 22:32, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]