Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 January 27
Appearance
< January 26 | January 28 > |
---|
January 27
[edit]A higher quality version of this image has been uploaded by me. I was the one who originally uploaded this version.--Urthogie 00:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Orphan, non-notable, seems pointless. Michaelbusch 23:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Wiyo4 (notify | contribs). Unencylopedic — Balloonguy 00:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC).
- Delete I agree with the nomination, where exactly would this be necessary???. Tellyaddict 15:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Victorwynnjohnson (notify | contribs). Now OROR, CV probability, article speedy deleted due to WP:BIO, WP:V + WP:BAND — SkierRMH 01:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also nominating, from the same uploader for the same reasons:
- Image is UN. Aswell as this agree with nomination. Tellyaddict 15:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Ftobe (notify | contribs). orphaned image User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete UN, and because its orphaned it gives it a higher chance of being deleted. Tellyaddict 15:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Sara Sanborn (notify | contribs). Orphan, Unencyclopedic Valrith 02:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rude Image, wouldn't even be allowed to be used on user page. definitely UN. Tellyaddict 15:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Sara Sanborn (notify | contribs). Orphan, Unencyclopedic Valrith 02:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Freekee (notify | contribs). Obsolete, replaced by Pretend-album-cover.png — Freekee 03:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia already has a no cover available picture on album articles so it doesn't really need another one. Tellyaddict 15:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Atarzi (notify | contribs). OR, image is unrelated to both the copyright tag and the image description, likely an accidental upload BigDT 04:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This image could be relevant to an article about this possibly famous person of many years ago, all I can suggest is a possible re-upload with correct license and possible a bit bigger.15:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Mrfibbers (notify | contribs). OR, user's only contribution BigDT 04:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by NisarKand (notify | contribs). On the picture's page on FlickR, it does not say Creative Commons, it says "© All rights reserved". — Behnam 07:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by CelebrateFairfax (notify | contribs). OR, advertisement BigDT 15:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Sinai Institute (notify | contribs). OR, article pretending to be an image BigDT 15:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tony Combe (notify | contribs). OR, a corporate logo, and thus likely non-free BigDT 15:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Tony Combe (notify | contribs). (Not an orphan) Image is tagged with PD-self, but the description says, "Tony Combe, INXSTOR, INXSTOR owns copyright". So more than likely, this is a work product and not available to us under a free license. BigDT 15:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by GemmaStone2 (notify | contribs). OR, a PDF of somebody's family tree BigDT 15:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Kieransalford (notify | contribs). OR, a screenshot, so likely non-free BigDT 15:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Milinko (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 15:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Pmgomez (notify | contribs). OR, a chart of values and influences, possibly original research BigDT 17:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Gy.Daniel (notify | contribs). OR, "No screenshot yet" BigDT 17:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Uploaded by Pengo (notify | contribs). No longer needed, redundant to . Used to be used in {{taxobox}} to redirect to Wikipedia:How to read a taxobox, but has since been replaced by the use of an imagemap. Basically orphaned now.- —Mets501 (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, small picture of a person, insufficient evidence to determine encyclopedic value BigDT 17:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Houghton90 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, presumably uploaded for a now-deleted article BigDT 17:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- DrLovesWiki (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, screenshot and thus likely non-free BigDT 18:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- DrLovesWiki (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, a logo and thus likely non-free BigDT 18:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- MightyTrev (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR — BigrTex 19:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Commons image showing through -Nv8200p talk 13:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- OR,UE — BigrTex 19:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR,LQ — BigrTex 19:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, UE — pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Stephenparfitt (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned image, questionable PD claim - believe it should be {{logo}} User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 20:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Godwits (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Godwits (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Godwits (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, images presumably for a deleted band article BigDT 20:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Unencyclopaedic, copyright the Foundation NOT GFDL but only used in user pages (hence pointless and not distributable). Think about people mirroring Wikipedia and copyright issues surrounding that -137.222.10.67 19:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- OR, UE —Yeonjae 21:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, UE —Yeonjae 21:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, UE —Yeonjae 21:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, logo for the uploader's own movie studio, WP:NOT free webhosting BigDT 21:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Lunar Chaos (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OB, OR, LQ Image:101 3.jpg - obsoleted by Image:JLSecretOrigins.jpg — UDHSS 21:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Artemisboy (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while— UDHSS 21:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE Orphaned and low quality image— UDHSS 21:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned image User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 21:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- David Vasquez (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, insufficient context to determine encyclopedic use BigDT 21:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, no evidence the image is free - virtually all of this contributor's uploads are copyvios BigDT 21:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- OR, UE, highly unlikely a free image BigDT 21:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Image is presented as "animal sacrifice" without attribution. It represents original research. — Yath 21:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I misspoke. The image itself isn't original research. Its presentation as animal sacrifice is, though, because we are depending on a Wikipedia editor to interpret it. As for you guys crying "censorship!", um, this has nothing to do with offensiveness. Read up on WP:NOR if you're not familiar with Wikipedia's original research policy.
- Also, I am assuming that the image, not being useful in sacrifice or animal sacrifice, won't be useful in any other article. I could be wrong - just find another article where it fits. I doubt there is a good place for it, though. --Yath 04:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Yath 04:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- DON'T DELETE Posting this picture 2 years ago was one of the more difficult wikidecisions that I've made. Having made it, I am inclined to stay with it. I suppose that it is original research in-so-far as explaining the scene pictured as animal sacrifice was my own. Of course, my companion and I were likely the only folks to see the scene after it was created, so no one else really had a chance to define it. However I will withdraw the picture if someone can come up with a credible explanation of how a large dog, appearing to have had its heart cut out, could end up in a circe of stones in the hills of Northern New Mexico. Carptrash 02:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, this would work as an excellent illustration for animal sacrifice. While this image may be disturbing to some (and it sure is to me!), WP:NOT censored, and it's a probably irreplaceable illustration of the subject. Seraphimblade 03:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that this qualifies as original research– just because you took a picture of something you don't understand, and you heard "local rumors about who does this sort of thing" does not qualify this as a real animal sacrifice. I can understand why you thought your discovery was extremely interesting, and wanted to share it, but you should share it with a local university anthropologist, not Wikipedia. By the way, it's not exactly impossible to take a picture of a verified "modern animal sacrifice"– such things are practiced regularly by Voodoo followers in the giant modern city where I live.--Pharos 03:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- I look forward to your pictures. Carptrash 04:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- I did a little checking, and University Woods, "the city's worst park", seems like a safe bet, though it doesn't seem particularly safe. Not sure if I'll go there, but I'll keep an eye out in my local parks. I could definitely get you a picture of kapparos next fall, though.--Pharos 05:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Go for the kapparos shot, but my opinion is that the cities worst park is best left to its own devices.
- I did a little checking, and University Woods, "the city's worst park", seems like a safe bet, though it doesn't seem particularly safe. Not sure if I'll go there, but I'll keep an eye out in my local parks. I could definitely get you a picture of kapparos next fall, though.--Pharos 05:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- I look forward to your pictures. Carptrash 04:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I am here as I was requested to offer my views on this point: [1]. While I am thankful to the person for calling me here, I am sorry that I do not any thing to comment. There are many intelligent editors and administrators who may take care of serious matter of building the sum total of human knowledge. Thanks and regards. --Bhadani 04:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Frivolous censorship. No photograph can be original "research": a photograph just is. It's not enough to call for a photo's deletion simply because we don't like it. Would the kind of person who'd suggest the photographer "faked" it be the very first to cite "Wikipedia:Assume good faith"? --Wetman 04:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- What does this have to with censorship? Noone here is objecting to having pictures of dead dogs. Nor has anyone accused the photographer of faking anything– the objection is that it's not at all clear that this strange thing he discovered in the desert actually is an animal sacrifice.--Pharos 04:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't think it's a question of OR so much as there being no foundation for the picture's use. From what I can see, the most accurate description would be "Most probably an animal sacrifice by persons unknown". We don't know for sure that the dog was sacrificed. We don't know who put the dog here. We don't know whether the dog was alive or dead when it arrived here. We don't know if it happened in the stone circle or if the stone circle was constructed around an already dead dog. What if this picture shows something other than the result of an animal sacrifice? If the article was Animals Which Appear To Have Been Sacrificed, the picture would fit right in. Kinda like Crop Circles fit under Crop Circles but not Extraterrestrial Activity on Earth, until it's demonstrated that the aliens made the crop circles. -- Butseriouslyfolks 04:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- I will certainly except "Most probably an animal sacrifice by persons unknown" as a friendly amendment for the caption for the picture returned to the article. Carptrash 04:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete- per Pharos & Butseriouslyfolks. Keesiewonder talk 09:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC) ... Hmmm - I'm still thinking about this; perhaps, depending on how it is used on WP, it is harmless, even useful. Update from Delete to Weak Delete. Keesiewonder talk 11:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)- I certainly wouldn't mind if it was agreed to keep it on Wikipedia, in some capacity outside of the articles. If Carptrash wanted it at his user page, for instance.--Pharos 04:30, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well I think I'll pass on that one, tho I have another pic of a snake that has half swallowed a frog (a sort of work-in-progress) that would make a nice pair with it, but no, my user page is a family sort of place. No, it's a picture of an animal sacrifice and that's where it belongs, or, of course, pending the outcome of this discussion/vote, on the cutting room floor, where it is right now. Carptrash 08:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Could have been a dog hit by a car, that was brought away from the road, and that hastily was given a sepulture with some stones around, and then was somewhat eaten by an animal... Images for an article should be verifiably related to the subject.Robert Daoust 15:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - adding to the sum of human knowledge .... Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 08:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I kept the image as there is no technical reason to delete it. However, it is unverifiable and should not be used in articles. It could be used on talk and user pages if desired. -Nv8200p talk 23:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- OR, student walking by a building at UVA, but unlikely to be useful BigDT 21:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- delete Carptrash 04:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nectarflowed (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Usage policy too restricted for Wikipedia.[http://www.amren.com/siteinfo/information.htm]Ultramarine 22:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Obsoleted by Image:GUID Partition Table Scheme.svg. Replaced in all contexts.—Kbolino 22:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Commons image showing through. -Nv8200p talk 13:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Carl Jenkins (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unencylopedic Balloonguy 22:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- delete Carptrash 04:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- unencylopedic Balloonguy 22:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- delete Carptrash 02:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hollister21 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unencylopedic and orphan Balloonguy 22:24, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Choi.gloria (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unencylopedic and the description makes it seem to be slander Balloonguy 22:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- it's article was deleted because of notability Balloonguy 22:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphan article was speedy deleted for notibility Balloonguy 22:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Tariqsounright (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- unencylopedic Balloonguy 22:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gdfatheritalia (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, conficting copyright informaiton as website copied from states it is free/PD, but is only available for personal use, no commercial use. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Andy Miller 55 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 23:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 23:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while and low quality image — UDHSS 23:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, UE orphaned image and the article they were on has already posted newer images — UDHSS 23:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 23:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 23:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)