User talk:Omnibus

Userboxes

This user has been on Wikipedia for 20 years, 11 months and 6 days.

This user has made over
10,000 edits to Wikipedia.

This user has been a Wikipedian since December 2, 2003.

Regarding this edit summary

Until I see a source saying it's not, this will remain

The burden of proof is on editors adding/restoring material. I'm glad to see you provide a reference for the claim (JLDS before, during and after my membership made dubious claims about its history) -- but, "it stays unless you disprove it" is the exact opposite of how Wikipedia operates. --EEMIV (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't saying one can just add material he believes is true without a source and expect it to stay. But what you did was remove sourced material until it was verified by "a third party" when no such verifying third party exists on the topic. Omnibus (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The claim about the Jefferson Society was "sourced" to the Society's web site -- given that it is a superlative claim about the Society's longevity, the source has a conflict of interest and it was inappropriate to cite at Wikipedia. And as you demonstrated a bit later, the University has substantiated the claim (still dubious given that JLDS is part of UVa, but sufficiently removed for the time being). You can probably find more information in Mr. Jefferson's University by Virginius Dabney. If a third-party source doesn't exist for something, then the claim should not be included. --EEMIV (talk) 19:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the entity making the claim. If I could reference something extremely notable from the MIT website about the school, and there was no third-party source that disagreed (and no third-party source that agreed) it would be, and is, worthy of being on Wikipedia. There are numerous examples of this on many university pages. But, the Jeff Society is not MIT... I didn't know about their supposed "reputation for lying" until you told me... just another reason the Wash is the superior society I suppose. Anyway, this is all a hypothetical argument at this point. Omnibus (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Noabaak (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi, i am a published writer currently working on New York Guide for Korean readers. I'd like to use your photograph on 'Chinese cooks taking a break' and would like to get permission. if willing, pls let me know through email with your full name for photo credit.

thanks in advance, noa

NowCommons: File:Fisherman-Fordham.jpg

File:Fisherman-Fordham.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Fisherman-Fordham.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Fisherman-Fordham.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiBirthday

I saw from here that it's been exactly six years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 15:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Virginia – West Virginia rivalry

I have nominated Virginia – West Virginia rivalry, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia – West Virginia rivalry. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. B (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

VPC

You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion.

— raeky T 00:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wladyslaw-Jagiello.jpg

Unfortunately, there is no "freedom of panorama" for sculptures in US. If you want to keep your photo, please take it back to English Wikipedia on "fair use" terms.

Regards,

A.J. (talk) 11:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Scott.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Scott.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Albemarle County

Hello! WikiProject Albemarle County, an outreach effort supporting development of Albemarle County and surrounding area related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been started. As a user who has shown an interest in related topics I wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the project. If you are interested please visit our page (currently under construction) and add the user badge to your talk page. Thank you!!!

- WikiManOne (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virginia football helmet.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Virginia football helmet.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mt king ^(edits) 09:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Benedict-Ronald.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Benedict-Ronald.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mike London.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mike London.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mike London.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mike London.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the copyright status and source is very clearly stated on the image page. Omnibus (talk)

Talkback

Hello, Omnibus. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia-Louisville rivalry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rodney McCray and Jeff Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rent (musical), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Village (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quibble about what a Founder is

Rather than revert a reversion, which I find does not lead to constructive colloquy, I will leave it be and simply invite your attention to a question raised on the University of Virginia talk page: Talk:University of Virginia#The only President to found an institution of higher learning? With best wishes, ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 16:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Desmond Hague

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. ubiquity (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In actuality, the article was completely sourced and neutral view. I'll come back later, but let me know if you find any positive citations about the subject in the meantime. No? Thanks for trying. Omnibus (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Y Combinator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Student housing at the University of Virginia

The article Student housing at the University of Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Yes, the housing exists, but there is no indication why it is NOTABLE. Existing isn't enough to justify an article, and none of the sources deal with the concept of student housing as a whole, so there is no significant coverage of the exact topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dennis 2¢ 18:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Student housing at the University of Virginia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Student housing at the University of Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Student housing at the University of Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 23:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clemson–Georgia Tech football rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1990 college football season. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar awarded

		The Editor's Barnstar
		for a good decision on what ought not to be included. ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 12:56, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Louisville–Virginia rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rodney McCray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roy Williams and Larry Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated removal of an image on the UVA page

Hi Omnibus, when you first removed the image quite a while ago, you objected to its technical quality and mentioned you would replace it with a better one. That never happened. (Talk about good faith assumptions!) Instead, subsequently the two only other African-Americans on the page -- Boyd Tinsley and Julian Bond -- were also removed. This behavior certainly justified, especially in light of UVA's racist history, my suspicion that an editor's personal prejudices were driving such action. When I reinstated the photos of Tinsley, Bond and Dove, you proceeded to remove the photo of Dove with the president under a changing set of technical reasons, but never returned to your original announcement to replace it with a better quality image. This then, in today's hostile political climate especially against President Obama and together with your seemingly anti-Black photo eliminations, led me to the logical conclusion that there might be a rather sinister motive at play. I do not mind you replacing the image of Rita Dove and the president with a better one, if you can find one that's in the public domain. Until then I will continue to undo removals of the image. Fredv (talk) 06:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fredv, I appreciate your talking with me on this page about the issue. Without the Dove image, there are only two post-1950 closeups on the page. Kathryn Thornton, the astronaut faculty member, and Boyd Tinsley. This is 50% African American representation and 50% female representation at a 10% African American and 55% female school, surely you are not offended by that? Also, Julian Bond is still on the page under "Prominent Faculty". I believe that we can add one to this list, and I will add Dove there soon (making 33% of the "Prominent Faculty" representation African American as well). Also, along the lines of Wikipedia: Assume Good Faith, that is a good document to start with as to why you shouldn't make assumptions about motives for other people, but especially that you shouldn't voice them. It often leads to a toxic environment where editors find it increasingly difficult to find common ground. I'll leave the Dove image as you have placed it for now before I edit the faculty box, just changing the size as appropriate. Thank you very much. Omnibus (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Looks like you have already found the appropriate sizing for now. Thanks! Omnibus (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Omnibus, sounds good. Someone had also removed Boyd Tinsley as well as the "Prominent Faculty" bar, both of which I then reinstated. Actually, "Prominent Faculty" would probably benefit from a renaming as "Prominent Former Faculty", or better yet, from a redesign. And if there's a bit more space, I'd suggest adding a photo of Larry Sabato. No doubt, Sabato and Dove are the most prominent and highly acclaimed current faculty members at UVA. (Representation here is not really a question of racial and gender percentages but more one of national and international visibility.) No matter -- thanks for leaving the Dove-Obama image in place. Fredv (talk) 11:04, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NASDAQ

Thank you for your helpful edit to NASDAQ! Could I twist your arm into citing your source, though? The article's already tagged for {{Refimprove}}. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 19:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that wiki links cannot serve as citations, but thank you for going ahead and providing a proper citation. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 06:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louisville–Virginia rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louisville–Virginia rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisville–Virginia rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calathan (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited University of Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital One Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dream Team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Tech Project Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Go Hokies (talk) 22:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

State usage

Hi. Apologies if I came across badly. You are obviously a hugely experienced editor and know your way round this place better than me. I was just curious when it became mandatory to include states? It seems especially unnecessary in somewhere as famous as NYC with the state also sharing the same name. I've seen Oxfordshire removed from those from Oxford. New York City, New York...I dunno just seems abit repetitive and not what folk think of first (being from the UK i think of NYC, US). You can change my edit back if I'm not making much of a case here. RyanTQuinn (talk) 18:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That was actually rather enlightening, thank you. Since the subject (David Bowie) is from England, it may make sense that his article would leave out the state. It looks irregular to Americans this way, but since both you and John are British perhaps it's a cultural divide and should be used sans state. Much as it should probably use British spellings. Thanks much! You made a good case. Omnibus (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roy Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia–Virginia Tech rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Press. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD concerning your alt account

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Uris/Georgetown. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:10, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:University of Virginia faculty box

Template:University of Virginia faculty box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Omnibus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Omnibus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for a page

Dear Omnibus,

As previously you have contributed to Wikipedia in regards to financial articles, would you, please, consider writing an article on Creamfinance? It is a global financial services company that provides personal finance products in emerging markets. The company was ranked as the second fastest-growing company in Europe in 2016. Creamfinance is employing over 220 people and operating in 7 countries both within and outside of Europe – Latvia, Poland, Czech Republic, Georgia, Denmark and Mexico with an IT office in Austria.

I believe it corresponds to the Wikipedia notability rules as it has been talked about in legitimate third party sources.

If you wish I have put together a first draft for the page and can send it you.

According to Wikipedia guidelines I want to underline that I am a Project Manager at Golin Riga and I have been approached by Creamfinance to help with their representation on Wikipedia. Aozolins-golin-riga (talk) 08:38, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Puerile edit warring

[1] = WP:OWN + WP:DISRUPT + WP:WAR + ego 32.218.47.42 (talk) 14:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anonymous in Connecticut,

You're simply wrong about not being able to "win" an award. Check Merriam-Webster here. The prime example given for English usage of the word award is:

"A film that has won several awards."

See also the Google graph I linked you showing that books published since about 1993 are more likely to say someone "won" an award than that they were "given" an award. You were right once, but not for at least 20-25 years.

At any rate, happy editing!

Omnibus (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Omnibus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citing IMDb

Please read WP:IMDB/RS regarding use of IMDb on Wikipedia. In short, it should only be applied to External links, and not as a reference for actor's birthdays or filmographies. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Omnibus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gessner Harrison - Good Article Nomination

FYI, this article, about one of the first pupils and professors at the Univ. of Virginia, has been nominated as a good article at WP:GAN#LANG. Hoppyh (talk) 19:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.gif

The file File:Thomas Jefferson Signature.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved! There's a far superior version,

, since 2010. Omnibus (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of "47th vice president" at Joe Biden

Hi Ominibus, I see that you capitalized "47th vice president" at Joe Biden on the good-faith assumption that was correct and that it fixed the link. You may not be aware of MOS:JOBTITLES, which explains that when "Vice President" stands alone, it is a title and capitalized, but in other uses—especially when modified, as with "47th"—"vice president" becomes a common noun and is spelled with lower case. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that is useful. And explains why the wikilink is not capitalized but the very same words are in the article it links to. Omnibus (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia Cavaliers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cross country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Salt

It seems like you are a UVA fan/alum. I just created an article for Jack Salt and I was wondering if you'd be willing to help flesh it out a bit? Thanks for anything you can add. Rikster2 (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great article! I'll see if there's anything extra I can add, but it's pretty comprehensive already. Well done. Omnibus (talk) 17:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Guy Macon (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Zero issues with your edits. I am just hitting everyone on the Jenny McCarthy page that hasn't received a pseudoscience and fringe science discretionary sanctions alert in the last year) --Guy Macon (talk) 00:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia

Understood you are activley refactoring and I am staying out for now. Some general commments:

MOS:LEAD says "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents." There are now numerous elements which are not present in the article body.
MOS:LEADLENGTH says as guidline "Three or four paragraphs" for an article of this size. It is currently 6 paragraphs.
Some book citations lack a Template:Page needed parameter; Note re MOS:LEAD, the same content is not present in the article body
Multiple game scores are not typically presented in this location

Cheers, UW Dawgs (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! These are all good points and tips I will work on. Specifically, I intend to: (a) remove two of those three scores now; (b) revisit the three-volume book I've cited early next week for further information and page citations; (c) soon detail the body [which I've yet to touch] next week after finishing the lede; and (d) thereafter transition some of this information down to the body to make a shorter four-paragraph lede. I've never worked on the football articles of UVA before (strictly basketball) but will try to make this article as comprehensive and succinct as possible over time. Omnibus (talk) 18:20, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Big Ten Championship Game

Your revert of my edit makes sense, and I had not realized you already made this change once until now. My rationale was simply alphabetical rather than no order at all (as is the case with East and West). Thanks! Frank Anchor^Talk 00:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all, and thanks for coming by to explain. Happy editing Frank! Omnibus (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jackson-Pollock.jpg

The file File:Jackson-Pollock.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But the image just hit its 14th Anniversary! It is a relic of Wikipedia history. JK, it hasn't been used in over a decade. Omnibus (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Bennett (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 United States presidential election

Hi there. Please self-revert your removal of maintenance tags without consensus or without addressing the issue. You have already been reverted on this before, so please don't edit war. Nobody has claimed this article is the longest, in citations, words or otherwise, but this is clearly a very long article. Onetwothreeip (talk) 07:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was not properly placed in the first place, as there must be a Talk page section set up and there never was when set up in December 2020. It was an invalid tag. Omnibus (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly not going to start an "edit war" over the tag though, and I've only reverted it once. You are free to do as you wish. Omnibus (talk) 13:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aafia Siddiqui edits

I believe I might have damaged some of your "detailing" edits to the article on Aafia Siddiqui. I had merged our earlier edits, but had not realized you were also still editing the article. I am so sorry to ask for extra work from you, but could you please review the article to restore any changes you made in the last few minutes?

Astro-Tom-ical (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hi Omnibus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Lee Zeldin that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, but it was in fact a minor grammatical fix. Have a good one. Omnibus (talk) 02:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment of NATO page

NATO has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Morgoonki (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 12:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect New York Castle Doctrine statute.

I was at the article on the subject of the Castle Doctrine and saw you altered the link to the statute cited and wish to state that it is YOU sir that are incorrect. NYS PL 30.20 is not the New York castle doctrine it WAS 30.15, can't you read? Might need to take some reading comprehension remediation. Read 30.15 AT length before you decide to challenge me. 2603:7081:4040:FE00:75E3:6781:15B:EDAA (talk) 18:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's both. I'll update the article. In your dwelling you can use deadly force if (1) not the initial aggressor [30.15]; or (2) believe the person to be burglarizing or committing arson [30.20]. Your low-level insults and bizarre misuse of capitalization indicate you're not very intelligent or educated, but you were indeed half-right so I credit you. Omnibus (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerome Tang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Online learning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your diligent edits to the University of Virginia page SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:University of Virginia faculty box

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:University of Virginia faculty box requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_11#Template:University_of_Virginia_faculty_box. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:42, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you recreated a template that was deleted by consensus. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It had 1 vote to delete, based on a reason that no longer existed (unused and unfilled with images). Obviously that doesn't apply here or anymore. Omnibus (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But despite you being totally misguided about that second comment, I see you found a way to not break the page by removing the template. So, no worries as it seems unnecessary. I was just going with what the nice Cornell University page did. Omnibus (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Those Cornell templates should be part of the article as well. Templates are generally not used to store article content; see the template namespace guidelines, the first of which is generally interpreted to mean that relatively simple wikitext without template parameters should live in the article itself, not in a separate template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:University of Virginia alumni box

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:University of Virginia alumni box requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_11#Template:University_of_Virginia_alumni_box. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpe_Adria_Cup

Page forbidding country linking, involved user had unexplained removals before. Please take a look. 93.143.139.254 (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Commonwealth Clash Virginia VT rivalry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]