Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 8
Appearance
August 8
[edit]- Underneath-it-All (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - single screenshot of a copyrighted video used in segment about the video. Textbook example of meeting NFCC8 - any television programme, movie, music video and so on justifies a single screenshot (multiples maybe, maybe not). WilyD 21:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image deleted. Failed NFCC#8. Did not add significantly to the article and there was no commentary or discussion about the image. -Nv8200p talk 21:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
*Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used in gallery, not for commentary, delete per nom.--Knulclunk 03:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image deleted. Failed NFCC#8. Did not add significantly to the article and there was no commentary or discussion about the image. -Nv8200p talk 21:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- ShinigamiNiko (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - single screenshot of a copyrighted video used in segment about the video. Textbook example of meeting NFCC8 - any television programme, movie, music video and so on justifies a single screenshot (multiples maybe, maybe not). WilyD 21:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, helps readers understand the video commentary. --Pmsyyz 00:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image deleted. Failed NFCC#8. Did not add significantly to the article and there was no commentary or discussion about the image. What the image showed was adequately conveyed by words. -Nv8200p talk 21:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The article talks about the tour and this is one and only picture from this tour, showing Dion's image at that time. --Max24 10:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image deleted. Failed NFCC#8. Did not add significantly to the article and there was no commentary or discussion about the image. Image use was purely decorative. -Nv8200p talk 21:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Used commentary as permitted by WP:NFC#Examples of acceptable use: Film and television screen shots:"For critical commentary and discussion of the cinema and television." Keep for video commentary only. --Knulclunk 02:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image deleted. Failed NFCC#8. Did not add significantly to the article and there was no commentary or discussion about the image. -Nv8200p talk 21:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talalkatrji (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- www.repubblica.it does not release its content under a {{GFDL}} license. Dantadd 02:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFCC#1; replaceable by a free image of the band. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't delete this image. I'm getting tired of getting any image I upload deleted. Just don't do that, please! Videmus Omnia is just being an idiot. Alex 03:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Alex, I think you need to refrain from insulting other users. There is obviously a reason for so many of the images that you upload getting deleted, maybe you should read the wiki guidlines on image copyrights etc. I have little idea about copyrights and the like, and thats why I don't put images up. Maybe before you upload any more pictures/images, you should make sure that they will not violate any copyright laws. Remember, the reason for deleting such images is basically to prevent wiki being sued! Nouse4aname 08:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unfree image of a living person, "No free media has been released" is not a valid fair use rationale. High on a tree 03:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The criteria is whether this is replaceable. Since there isn't any way to replace this with a free image, there's no reason to get rid of it and the article, which is about a model, really needs a picture of her because otherwise it's an empty, lifeless article.Rebochan 13:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why can't this be replaced with a free image? Videmus Omnia Talk 16:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Because there are no free images in existence - trust me, I've looked. It's also not possible to create one. Unless the only criteria is that, in theory, at some point in time, a free image could appear, but in that case, the policy should be changed to "No non-free images under any circumstances." Rebochan 15:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- It's definitely possible to get free professional-quality photos of models - see this page. Did you try asking for one? Videmus Omnia Talk 16:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Because there are no free images in existence - trust me, I've looked. It's also not possible to create one. Unless the only criteria is that, in theory, at some point in time, a free image could appear, but in that case, the policy should be changed to "No non-free images under any circumstances." Rebochan 15:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why can't this be replaced with a free image? Videmus Omnia Talk 16:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Stovetopcookies (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is of a video game cartridge with a copyrighted label, user claims they created the image and released it as such, copyright violation Ejfetters 03:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I don't see how it's a copyright violation. It's like the photo of artwork example: a photograph of a painting would be copyvio if untagged but a photograph of a statue contains elements of the photographer's skill, so it belongs to him. The photographer in this case has released the image under GFDL. Axem Titanium 04:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- All it needs is to change the copyright tag. Ejfetters 05:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Re-tag and keep. The photographer may have released his copyright (in the photo); but that doesn't free us from copyright in the original label (of which this is a derived work). Jheald 07:39, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I put "created work" because I took the picture. If the issue is of a copyrighted label then I suggest to please use a tag related to copyrighted computer/video game media. My intent was only in submitting a photo of the cartridge I did not realize this could be a problem. Stovetopcookies 02:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Follow-up: I tried to change the copyright tag but the menu is gone. How can I get the drop-down menu back so that I can change the copyright tag to something pertaining to video game media? Stovetopcookies 18:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, it illustrates the article and is low resolution. Doesn't appear to be a copyright violation. CR7 (message me) 20:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Re-tag and keep. it's a low-res relavent picture, it's not copyright violation to have the picture for information intentions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Metroid dragon (talk • contribs) 22:29, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
- Image re-tagged and kept. -Nv8200p talk 18:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unfree image of a living person. "I felt that this page needed a photo at the top to look more professional. I feel this image is free as it was a scene from the movie 'Deliver us from Eva'" is not valid reasoning to upload unfree content, the given fair use rationale does not apply. High on a tree 05:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unfree image of a living person. "this shoudl be free because it was off of the calendar" is not a valid argument in copyright law. The given fair use rationale does not apply (which film??). High on a tree 05:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unfree image of a living person, uploaded to iullustrate the article about her. The given fair use rationale does not apply. High on a tree 05:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Consequentially (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- I uploaded this image from a CDC website, thinking it was a government photo. It is not, and as such is not in the public domain. Please delete. Consequentially 07:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Aaronrollman (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Speedy delete. Not Benoit house; complete and patent nonsense. Davnel03 08:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- superseded by SVG Image:Simpmult.svg MER-C 09:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- StarmanSuper00 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Copyright vio - user claims they created the image, but in fact it is a copyrighted screen capture Ejfetters 10:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. Our use of press or photo agency works infringes on potential commercial opportunities, as such companies profit by providing images, text, video, and other such media. Please see example No. 5 under Wikipedia:Non-free content#Examples of unacceptable use. — Rebelguys2 talk 10:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Copyright violation. User copied a copyrighted image from a video game, and claimed it as there own. Ejfetters 10:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. See Image:Ffvii worldmap new.png for a similar precedent. Kariteh 11:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Still a copyrighted image that has been "copied" by someone else, why not just upload an original, since the user said they "traced" the original. This would be more sufficient, as this still appear to be a copyright violation, since its been copied by someone other than the creator/copyright holder. Ejfetters 13:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- It was probably traced so that the crest appear clearer. The original was on a game cover, so it would probably have been "dirtier" if it had been scanned. Kariteh 13:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Still, doesnt' seem like a "tracing" of an existing work is totally "legal" Ejfetters 15:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- It was probably traced so that the crest appear clearer. The original was on a game cover, so it would probably have been "dirtier" if it had been scanned. Kariteh 13:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Still a copyrighted image that has been "copied" by someone else, why not just upload an original, since the user said they "traced" the original. This would be more sufficient, as this still appear to be a copyright violation, since its been copied by someone other than the creator/copyright holder. Ejfetters 13:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. See Image:Ffvii worldmap new.png for a similar precedent. Kariteh 11:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but again, this image is not necessary. The photograph on the card is clearly copyrighted, but no mention of who holds the copyright or souce of it are listed. Furthermore, there is no rationale. And lastly, it is hardly encylopedic that there is a credit card out there with the band's image on it, I am sure many images on Wikipedia have credit cards or equivalents with the images on them, this should be deleted Ejfetters 11:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. Did you not read the summary? It reads, "It's a low resolution image, owned by the MYplash company, that is going to be used in the Simple Plan article..." There is no other way to replace this image in terms of text aswell. The section in the article serves strongly that Simple Plan is no longer just the indie band that they were, but in fact a hugely marketed success. I'm saying this a lot, but repetition is the key. This is ridiculous. Why are you, Ejfetters, so insistent on deleting every single image on the Simple Plan article. In other words, you've either deleted or are trying delete every single image on the Simple Plan article. Why? This has gone to far. — Ian Lee (Talk) 19:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep to identify and illustrate Simple Plan MYplash cards in Simple Plan#MYplash. —Remember the dot (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Image used for commentary on simple plan cash card. --Knulclunk 03:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- The section you refer to is primarily about the card and not the band, the whole section should be deleted. Ejfetters 05:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- It has everything to do with the band! It's a freaking credit card with the band on it! And you still haven't answered me on why you are insistent on deleting every Simple Plan image. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- No more arguments from me, I've stated my stance Ejfetters 06:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've moved the whole section (including this image) to MYplash, because the section was mainly discussing MYplash cards in general, not just the Simple Plan one. The image is now needed even more because MYplash is the main subject of the article it is used in. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- It has everything to do with the band! It's a freaking credit card with the band on it! And you still haven't answered me on why you are insistent on deleting every Simple Plan image. — Ian Lee (Talk) 06:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- The section you refer to is primarily about the card and not the band, the whole section should be deleted. Ejfetters 05:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Image kept per concensus. -Nv8200p talk 18:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- User claims they have "copied" the original image themselves, wouldn't it just be better, if there is an original source, to upload the original? Ejfetters 13:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Have you seen the original image? Perhaps it is less clear than the redraw? or filled with hard to read fonts or copyrighted characters? Perhaps only exists "in game" as a screen scroll. I suspect a scan of the map is more likely to be nominated for deletion. *KEEP this, it is harmless. --Knulclunk 23:02, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete as it is just plain ol butt-ugly, but it would be nice to have a world map for the article. Note that that is a map of FFVIII's world though, even though the file name is FFVII. Tarc 00:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Butt ugly? Than request a redraw. Don't delete a useful image. --Knulclunk 03:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not because it is ugly, it is a copy of a copyrighted image. The original image should be uploaded instead of a user created copy of it. There are screen caps in the legend of zelda series of complete maps that look good, for several games in the series, see the Hyrule article. This seems to have been done properly there. Ejfetters 05:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dwightmccann (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Images uploaded to Wikipedia should not contain logos that serve a commercial purpose.
- Question - Can you point me in the direction of the policy that states this? Thanks. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} image, it can be altered to fit policy. Additionally, the uploader has not been notified of this deletion discussion as policy dictates. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing else some categories, it's should be in commons not in wikipedia. Wikipedia is not for better browsing images! OsamaK 14:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is already on the commons. You may have missed this on the image description page on wikipedia: "This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below." The image is not also stored on wikipedia. The image is transcluded into the wikipedia image description page.--Timeshifter 15:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I see, This is first time i use WP:TW for deleting ;). I mean we do not need this page for categories only. It's should be in commons. So we don't need this page. thanks Transclusion.--OsamaK 15:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Each of the wikipedia sites in various languages has their own category system. They usually prioritize their categories to mainly include images labeled in the language of that wikipedia. If the images have text on them. So people using English wikipedia categories do not have to wade through the many maps labeled in other languages on the commons. Also, non-English wikipedias use their own language to name their categories. So it is usually easier to find images in the category system set up for each other-language wikipedia. --Timeshifter 01:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- I see, This is first time i use WP:TW for deleting ;). I mean we do not need this page for categories only. It's should be in commons. So we don't need this page. thanks Transclusion.--OsamaK 15:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This is a perfectly valid placeholder for an image available on commons. Metros 16:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is already on the commons. You may have missed this on the image description page on wikipedia: "This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below." The image is not also stored on wikipedia. The image is transcluded into the wikipedia image description page.--Timeshifter 15:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for image description page. The image itself is not on Wikipedia, and for the record, I am not the uploader. I just added the image category to the textual description page. -- Beland 16:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep don't be silly. WilyD 21:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. 58.104.83.141 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 08:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, Why we need this page? for category? it's should be commons. for easier browsing? that's in commons. So for what?--OsamaK 23:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Having image description pages only on commons makes it harder for editors to find images they want/need for articles. Commons does have a better browsing system, but removing the browsing system from en just makes the encyclopaedia worse. Many users do not use commons, and since the image is already there commons doesn't suffer - there's no reason en.wiki should. WilyD 13:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, as you see. Kept--OsamaK 08:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The images serves a practical use to the article. Dogru144 23:05, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This image is very useful. I like this map, lets keep it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Flash Virus (talk • contribs)
- Keep Per all of the above. Feer 15:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Per above. I don't see a good reason to delete it. Aran|heru|nar 13:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think the image is a very good illustration of the distribution of Dharmic and Anbrahamic traditions. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations 04:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but also mention difference between terrestrial hinduism and anti-terrestrial buddhism and sikhisma and quasi-terrestrial jainism. User: PONDHEEPANKAR
- Keep It's an interesting map and doesn't need or deserve to be deleted. This is potentially helpful for those studying the topic.
- Keep per above; no good reason given for deletion.--SefringleTalk 06:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Naslund1944 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic image used in vandalism page only: Ryan Dhah- The Evil Spartan 15:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Naslund1944 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unencyclopedic image used in vandalism page only: Ryan Dhah- The Evil Spartan 15:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- MarkRyanIversen (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Fair use image of actor, should only be free use images Ejfetters 15:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- DragonWR12LB (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Again, fair use promo image for living person, replaceable with free use Ejfetters 15:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Deletion candidate from 7/4/07, marked to deleted after 7/11/07, not yet deleted. Ejfetters 15:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hold on there buddy! What's needed to make sure the picture works as fair-use?? Tabercil 16:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per new fair use info. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 02:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright holder unknown. Tripod.com is not an authoritative source of photos. howcheng {chat} 17:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup - delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - single screenshot of a copyrighted video used in segment about the video. Textbook example of meeting NFCC8 - any television programme, movie, music video and so on justifies a single screenshot (multiples maybe, maybe not). WilyD 21:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video closeup - delete per WP:NFCC#8, does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 15:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, possibly unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, possibly unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, possibly unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, possibly unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, possibly unfree. Videmus Omnia Talk 17:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, not encyclopedic. Was used to illustrate biography deleted per WP:BIO. Pascal.Tesson 18:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a personal gallery. Hu 00:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Now an orphan. Image Image:Tetragonal prism.png is much nicer and is being used instead. Pascal.Tesson 19:03, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- False h0pe (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Permission claimed, but no OTRS MECU≈talk 19:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- CelticJobber (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image is not being used in compliance with its fair use tag. It is a screenshot from a film, but is being used to identify the actress in one article, and is being used purely decoratively in another. The image is not being used to support any critical commentary on the film and its contents. The fact that a celebrity is dead means we can't assume a nonfree image is replaceable with a free one; it does not mean we have a free hand to use any nonfree image of them we want. See the discussion at WP:FUR —Angr 20:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. NFCC#8 violation.
- Delete per nom. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 17:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video close-up of singer's face. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 20:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Works of the government of Ecuador are not released under PD. - Dantadd 20:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video close-up of singer's face. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 21:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Low quality Videmus Omnia Talk 21:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, possible copyvio. Videmus Omnia Talk 21:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Videmus Omnia Talk 21:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video close-up of singer's face. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video close-up of singer's face. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Neddyseagoon (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- MikeGodwinSays pictures of coins do not fall under Bridgeman v. Corel -Nard 22:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright on a c271 AD coin? I think you'll have to prove that. --Knulclunk 23:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- The coin might have no copyright but the photo is not freely licensed. -Nard 23:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- I wouldn't think a black background on a top-down photo of public domain coins is copyrightable. —Remember the dot (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- So, Keep because it's in the public domain, or adopt under fair use if it's not actually in the public domain. —Remember the dot (talk) 15:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I strongly doubt that the authorities of a secessionist state that was suppressed 1734 years ago are going to complain about this. More seriously, how can a picture of a coin - one of only two examples of the coin known - which is kept in a museum which does not permit photography by the public, not be fair use? -- Arwel (talk) 08:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- The problem is that frequently museums want to raise revenue by selling images of items in their collections for use in books, articles, etc. If you needed this image to illustrate a history book you were writing, you'd just license it from the museum for use in your book. But Wikipedia doesn't allow us to do that. (Well, in theory it could go out and arrange permissions for thousands of images, but that would be expensive, and would not be GFDL-compatible.) Crypticfirefly 05:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless the photo policy of the museum only allows fair use. Cruccone 21:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- This coin is in the Ashmolean Museum. While I believe that they permit some photography (handheld only) for "personal use" arguably that would not include inclusion in Wikipedia. And even if it were, it would be shot through a case at a distance and not show the coin or the guy on it anywhere near as clearly. Crypticfirefly 05:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- Music video close-up of singer's face. Delete per WP:NFCC#8; does not significantly increase readers' understanding in a way words cannot. Videmus Omnia Talk 22:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)