Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 August 1

< July 31	August 2 >

August 1

Image:Autopsia_cdrom2.jpg

Image:Autopsia_cdrom2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jozef Ahmed (notify | contribs).

Non-free CD cover used without any commentary on the album being depicted. howcheng {chat} 00:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dbhcms_screenshot.jpg

Image:Dbhcms_screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dr.benhur (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, article deleted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DBHcms. Core desat 04:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-free orphaned screenshot of Internet Explorer. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lorazepam DOJ.jpg

Image:Lorazepam DOJ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fuzzform (notify | contribs).

Low quality, contributes virtually nothing to the one article it's used in, Lorazepam. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is however freely licensed and used in the article? Bleh999 15:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to replace it with a higher resolution picture, also from the DOJ. I disagree that it contributes nothing, but I will acknowledge that it is indeed very low resolution. Fuzzform 19:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the size and shape of pills is somewhat important at least when describing and identifying pharmaceuticals Bleh999 22:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RikerpostTNG.jpg

Image:RikerpostTNG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kross (notify | contribs).

obsoleted by WilRiker.jpg, WilRiker2.jpg, and subsequent images. — Ejfetters 06:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC).

Image:Ameliav.jpg

Image:Ameliav.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by XLR8TION (notify | contribs).

Although I believe that images such as this should be allowed under the non-free content critera, recent precedent suggests this image should be deleted — PageantUpdater talk • contribs 08:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Image:Kathhow.JPG

Image:Kathhow.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Isis (notify | contribs).

OR + Low quality cropped thumbnail of commons image. Better just to use the commons image. — Papa November 1 09:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:25thground.jpg

Image:25thground.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by IAREJOE (notify | contribs).

Orphaned image from speedily deleted nn band article. No other possible encyclopedic use. ~Matticus ^T_C 09:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -WarthogDemon 20:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per image orphan. --Hornetman16 ^(talk) 20:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Employee_Retention_Process_and_Your_Marriage.pdf

Image:Employee_Retention_Process_and_Your_Marriage.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sanjeevhimachali (notify | contribs).

Orphaned PDF of article written by its uploader: delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not your web host. No other possible encyclopedic use. - Clicketyclack 12:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Soft Skills for HR Professionals.pdf

Image:Soft Skills for HR Professionals.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sanjeevhimachali (notify | contribs).

Orphaned PDF of article written by its uploader: delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not your web host. No other possible encyclopedic use. - Clicketyclack 12:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carsongrant2006sm.jpg

Image:Carsongrant2006sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carson Grant (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted vanity page. — Calton | Talk 13:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maryscot.JPG

Image:Maryscot.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Isis (notify | contribs).

Better quality, very similar image exists at commons, with same name commons:Image:Maryscot.jpg — Papa November 1 13:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spa_cover1.jpg

Image:Spa_cover1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kenneth_Davis (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted spam page. — Calton | Talk 14:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ken_web_deewhy_april.jpg

Image:Ken_web_deewhy_april.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kenneth_Davis (notify | contribs).

UE, OR, AB. Used on now-deleted spam page. — Calton | Talk 14:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Alpha3_picture.jpg

Image:Alpha3_picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alpha3 (notify | contribs).

No longer needed — Alpha3 14:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Britisharmy678.jpg

Image:Britisharmy678.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ultrabeater (notify | contribs).

It is possible to provide a free alternative for this kind of image -recent and replaceable Bleh999 14:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why has it been removed, before an alternative was uploaded?--Raphael1 22:45, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per Howcheng, use of this copyrighted image is not necessary as the full text of the letter is in the article. It is also not the duty of Wikipedia to use the image to prove the letter's authenticity. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 15:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:450_ap_statement_061124.jpg

Image:450_ap_statement_061124.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ilgiz (notify | contribs).

Violates NFCC #8, in that it (being mere words) doesn't show anything mere words cannot. Also, it's not fair use to reproduce this letter in full. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the use of the image (as opposed to the use of the text) is significant and fair.

Significance (Non-Free Content Criterion #8). Since there was some suspicion among Alexander Litvinenko's critics, including Putin, about the authenticity of his deathbed statement, a facsimile of the statement is important to quell the doubts. Below the words, the facsimile shows Litvinenko's signature and a hand-written day of the month.
Fair use. According to the Wikipedia:Fair use guideline,

If photos are themselves particularly newsworthy (the subject of discussion in the news, and not merely depicting an event, person or people widely discussed in the news), low-resolution versions of the photos may be "fair use" in articles mentioning the photo.

Thanks to User:RHB, the image page shows reasons to consider the use of the image as fair:

the publication of the letter does not detract from any commercial production and was widely reproduced
it was published by Mr Litvinenko and his family with a purpose towards being widely distributed
it is not being used commercially
it is of low resolution and any copy made will be of poor quality

In my opinion, presenting the letter in full along with the signature and date makes the image important and newsworthy.ilgiz 01:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Considering the text of the letter is quoted in full in the article, there's absolutely no point in showing a scan of the letter itself. There's no need for Wikipedia to prove the letter's authenticity; that job is handled elsewhere in the reliable sources that we cite. howcheng {chat} 21:28, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please bear with me as I posted a note on this discussion in the main article's talk page only today.ilgiz 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. For the very reason of Putin's harsh dispute of Litvenenko's claims against the Russian Government, the image of this historical document gives useful substance to a description of Litveneko's life as a dissident, and as a political refuge. Fagiolonero 05:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image:747_flight_attendants.jpg

Image:747_flight_attendants.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jauren (notify | contribs).

Image of flight attendants around a jet, used decoratively, provides no useful encyclopedic information – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 14:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd argue that it does provide useful encyclopedic information. The photograph is of the 1968 rollout of the very first 747. The flight attendants pictured are representative of each airline that had ordered the 747. The world's very first passenger "jumbo jet" is of note; as well as showing how flight attendants dressed in that era. The picture is used on the 747 page - in context with excellent explainatory text. Just my 2 cents. --65.93.59.196 16:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a great picture, but wholly unnecessary for the article. There is no commentary about the photo specifically and its removal would not significantly impair the reader's understanding. howcheng {chat} 21:30, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above and no source as well Bleh999 00:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per 65.93.59.196. The image provides important historical context. Novakreo 20:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a historic photo and is a perfect example of fair use. -Fnlayson 02:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's an iconic image of the aerospace industry in the US. It's one of "the images" of the 20th century...or I'm just being melodramatic...I have a special place in my heart for this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zamoeba (talk • contribs)
Comment Source info has been added. It's from Joe Sutter's 747 book. -Fnlayson 17:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Must Keep This photo is valuable to the past of the 747 it stresses what an amazing event this must have been. It's a window into our past if you will. Carpenma

Image:81sotc.jpg

Image:81sotc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Valgabr (notify | contribs).

non-free image used to show what this person looked like when she was 17. We have a free photo of her recently, and her change in appearance is not the subject of the article. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep This image is an important historical moment, is correctly sourced and with a detailed rationale. Susan Gayle's appearance at 17 IS key to the article. It was at 17 she was discovered and recruited into The Human Leagueand this was almost exclusively down to her appearance at the time, as is outlined in The Crazy Daisy Story. How she looks today at 44 years old is now completely different to how she looked at 17 (or 25, 32 for that matter). The rationale then goes on to explain her relationship with lifelong best friend Joanne Catherall which is also key to the band's history, also mentioned in the article. There are plenty of Photos on wikipedia that should be deleted, but not those that are playing by the rules. Andi064 18:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I assume the photo is intended to back up the statement, "With unique dance moves, immaculate make-up, and an ultra-feminine dress style, Oakey felt they would be ideal as dancers." First of all, this statement smacks of original research, being uncited. Secondly, I don't see how this photo shows "immaculate make-up" and "an ultra-feminine dress style" that might call for a photo to be understood properly. howcheng {chat} 21:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Anafranil.png

Image:Anafranil.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by NBINVDR1 (notify | contribs).

Ad, used decoratively – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sweets.jpg

Image:Sweets.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Parko15 (notify | contribs).

was used on a page which got speedily deleted - Saibod 15:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old European Script characters

These images are all GFDL, but they're orphans. If they were used, they'd be used in the Old European Script article, but they're not great quality. (There isn't a Unicode equivalent, though, so far as I can tell.) – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Keep Irreplacible.--Hornetman16 ^(talk) 20:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course they're replaceable. Anyone could redraw them -- preferably in svg format so they weren't so smudged and low quality. But if we're going to keep them or replace them, shouldn't they be used in an article somewhere? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 22:24, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - I thought about that and was even considering making SVG versions of them, but they're orphaned and I don't even know if they're a complete set or anything. The German version looks like it has a font character table, which may prove just as useful, but it has a lot more characters than are in this list. howcheng {chat} 21:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hitler1928nuremburg.JPG

Image:Hitler1928nuremburg.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcattell (notify | contribs).

Image is a low res. of copy Hitler1928.jpg Barliner 17:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Hitler1928.jpg link for clarification. Agathoclea 17:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned copy - delete Agathoclea 17:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedied under CSD I1. howcheng {chat} 23:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brumby 0406 narrowweb 300x459,0.jpg

Image:Brumby 0406 narrowweb 300x459,0.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aussiewikikid (notify | contribs).

Replaceable fair use, wrong fair use tag — Richmeister_talk 17:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spoilerx.jpg

Image:Spoilerx.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DrBat (notify | contribs).

The image runs counter to the information here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright#Images which cannot be "fair use" and the underlying principle of not using material copied from existing encyclopedias and encyclopedia-like works. The image was created and used in such a context where originally published. — J Greb 17:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Web source for this image [1] notes that images are free only if used for non-commercial use and no alterations, but the image has clearly been altered to omit the white text. — Rkitko ^(talk) 18:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This one as well: Image:Utriculariabiloba1web.jpg. The first image listed doesn't appear to be on the source website anymore. --Rkitko ^(talk) 19:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note the nominated image now resides on Commons, so any issues would have to be brought up there. --cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 15:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BlueAnchorPasty.jpg

Image:BlueAnchorPasty.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sbz5809 (notify | contribs).

Image features uploader's watermark in violation of Wikipedia's image use policy. Uploader is no longer active, so we cannot request non-watermarked version. Creating an alternative image complying with the image use policy should be easy due to the prevalence of Cornish pasties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Safalra (talk • contribs)
I have created and uploaded a free replacement (here), so it is safe to delete this one. —David Johnson [T|C] 12:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:G4tv.jpg

Offensive Image, goatse. Obviously a joke.--_ BaRiMzI _ 20:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:STDS9 cast season 5-6.jpg

Image:STDS9 cast season 5-6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yelgrun (notify | contribs).

Image has no clear source, and was tagged for speedy deletion on 7/24, the tag has since expired and though the user has been notified, no clear source has yet to be provided. — Ejfetters 22:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC).

Image:Voyagercrew.jpg

Image:Voyagercrew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by King of the Dancehall (notify | contribs).

Image has no clear source, and was tagged for speedy deletion on 7/24, the tag has since expired and though the user has been notified, no clear source has yet to be provided. — Ejfetters 22:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC).

Image:Defiant-2.jpg

Image:Defiant-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ratamacue (notify | contribs).

Copyright info says this is a screenshot, but it looks like a publicity image for the tv series. The source cited for it is a dead link to a wiki fan site of Star Trek. It has also been replaced by DefiantDS9.jpg, a screencap of the show with fair use rationale and source cited Ejfetters 23:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC).