User talk:Ultrabeater

Welcome!

Hello, Ultrabeater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Oldelpaso 10:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative fair use images

I reverted your edit to FA Premier League which added the Arsenal crest to a table, as decorative use of fair use images is not allowed under the Fair use policy. Oldelpaso 10:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rochdale.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rochdale.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Davedunn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Davedunn.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 18:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Britisolders.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Britisolders.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 18:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Britsoldiers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Britsoldiers.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 18:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Apache22.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Apache22.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 18:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This images appears to be from the defenceimagedatabase - with the watermark cropped from the bottom. We cannot use this under a fair use licence as we already have free alternatives. I'll list it for deletion. Mark83 19:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing images

When uploading photographs, please write in the Summary who took the photo, where was it taken, when was it taken and who is in the photo and what it depicts. If taken from a website please add a link. Remember that, if the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after notification. Thanks, feydey 18:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:Gpmging.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Gpmging.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk/fotoweb/Preview.fwx?position=58&archiveType=ImageFolder&albumId=5004&sorting=ModifiedTimeAsc&search=gpmg&fileId=82009AFCAB28BB7B4818188E6EE0F5842527F21A9EA60BCB068E1C97D7AA43F0BA877BF55CF600ED1D3DB01BD3914663847FC3A31E998C7A847FC3A31E998C7A97F8E34D5AB51022513741741DE1AE2BF7B439EE3BC281C0D7615A935204AD406A91EE819CAED110E6001A14B5B7A5ACFFA229DB98E071ACD849B31BA141CD5E. As a copyright violation, Image:Gpmging.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Gpmging.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Gpmging.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Gpmging.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mark83 19:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk/fotoweb/Preview.fwx?position=328&archiveType=ImageFolder&sorting=ModifiedTimeAsc&search=sa80&fileId=82009AFCAB28BB7B4818188E6EE0F5842527F21A9EA60BCB068E1C97D7AA43F0BA877BF55CF600ED1D3DB01BD39146635BDEE388258E59BB5BDEE388258E59BB735B4849931B2460513741741DE1AE2BF7B439EE3BC281C0D7615A935204AD406A91EE819CAED110E6001A14B5B7A5ACFFA229DB98E071ACD849B31BA141CD5E. As a copyright violation, Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Sa80on patrol.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mark83 19:36, 12 February 2007 (UTC) on the User Talk page of the author.[reply]

Continuing to upload copyrighted material that cannot qualify for fair use.

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome. Thank you. Mark83 23:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:Lsw22.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Lsw22.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk/fotoweb/Preview.fwx?position=24&archiveType=ImageFolder&sorting=ModifiedTimeAsc&search=lsw&fileId=82009AFCAB28BB7B4818188E6EE0F5842527F21A9EA60BCB068E1C97D7AA43F0BA877BF55CF600ED1D3DB01BD39146630CCAA0B76D12B04E0CCAA0B76D12B04E2AC6235D7635DA27513741741DE1AE2BF7B439EE3BC281C066D56A65F68956CB47FF4BF13D7DB6C1193EFB6CE8BB859042860D60F9DBB5F1CDFCB0D11FBBE209. As a copyright violation, Image:Lsw22.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Lsw22.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Lsw22.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Lsw22.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mark83 23:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Image:Newsa80.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Newsa80.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk/fotoweb/Preview.fwx?position=31&archiveType=ImageFolder&sorting=ModifiedTimeAsc&search=sa80&fileId=82009AFCAB28BB7B4818188E6EE0F5842527F21A9EA60BCB068E1C97D7AA43F0BA877BF55CF600ED1D3DB01BD39146632ABF050CC55FFA9E2ABF050CC55FFA9ED452D765484DE4B9513741741DE1AE2BF7B439EE3BC281C066D56A65F68956CB47FF4BF13D7DB6C1193EFB6CE8BB859042860D60F9DBB5F1CDFCB0D11FBBE209. As a copyright violation, Image:Newsa80.jpg appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Newsa80.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on [[Talk:Image:Newsa80.jpg]]. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Image:Newsa80.jpg, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Mark83 23:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Parabadge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parabadge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Pclv.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pclv.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images

Please always verify your are not overwriting existing images with your image uploads as you have done with Image:Challenger.jpg. You overwrote this image with your tank pic although the original version was of a ship. --Denniss 12:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crown Copyright

Hi. I notice with your recent uploads you have said "Allowed to be shown as this picture comes under crown copyright". That is not the case. Only some crown copyright material is available for use. If you read the terms of use of defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk you can see it says "The material featured on this website is subject to Crown Copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The material may be downloaded to file or printer for the purposes of non-commercial research and private study. Any other proposed use of the material is subject to a copyright licence available from the Ministry of Defence in accordance with standard Crown Copyright licensing policy. Copyright reproduction fee(s) may be applicable."

Also in several cases you have uploaded duplicate images, i.e. images that would require a full fair use rationale, a main plank of which would need to be "no free alternatives available." But as I said, there often has been. Please get in touch if you have any questions. Thank you Mark83 17:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Land rover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Land rover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 02:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I explained above that images from defenceimagedatabase.mod.uk are not applicable for use in Wikipedia. Please do not upload any more images from that site. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mark83 14:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your edit to Theo Walcott

i am not sure which part of the infobox's instructions do you not understand, but the infobox does not consider goals scored outside of the domestic league context. hence, his goal against chelsea in the league cup final would not be included in the statistics. beyond that, you also deleted the reminder in the infobox that contained the instruction to editors such as yourself who may want to update his statistics. but most importantly, you only saw fit to update his number of goals without checking what exactly is his total number of appearances in all competitions, something you need not have done if you had read the instructions, but something which you did not but should have done if you believed the infobox statistics pertained to all competitions. please do not have the same oversight again because as you can see from the history of the page, many have made the same mistake and it simply requires someone else to clear it up, which is unacceptable because the instruction appears twice in the infobox. thanks. Chensiyuan 11:25, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Inskip-googleearth.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Inskip-googleearth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny (talk) 06:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester

Take a look at the Manchester article now - I believe this is what you intended to do? I think it looks good, and more akin to Birmingham. Jhamez84 16:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Lloyd

A tag has been placed on Henri Lloyd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Iridescenti 12:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.

Copyright problems with Image:Police sprinter.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Police sprinter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 19:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to upload copyrighted images

I have been very patient but this is your final warning. If you continue to upload copyrighted images you will be blocked from editing. Please stop uploading copyrighted text also. Thank you. Mark83 19:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Lancs armed response police.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Lancs armed response police.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 19:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Pclv.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Pclv.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 20:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Condopolice.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Condopolice.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 20:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sas22.jpg

Hi there. I have to ask where you got the image Image:Sas22.jpg. I ask as I notice you've uploaded it and stated it has no copyright because it is the work of the Federal Government of the US. Problem is I see no evidence that the photo is of an SAS trooper, and also am unsure as to why the Federal Government of the US would be taking and publishing pictures of an SAS trooper. Thanks in advance. Ben W Bell talk 21:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been well warned. The last time I said it was your last warning and you proceeded to upload this Crown Copyright image (see here) and pass it off as your own work. The block is for 24 hours. Please do not upload anymore copyrighted material. More copyright violations will result in further and lengthier blocks. Mark83 22:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Britisharmy678.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Britisharmy678.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bleh999 14:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Bulldog2007.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bulldog2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bleh999 14:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]