Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The New York Times/1
Appearance
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted per the lack of "keep" votes and effort to address below issues over two months. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
This article seems to no longer meet the GA criteria. The History section (after 1912ish) is in dire need of expansion, the criticism section has no basis for what should be there, and what should be on the subpage. The Awards and 1970s and 1980s and 990s and 2000 and Digital era all need expansion. There are citation needed tags. I feel that community discussion is needed on this topic. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:31, 25 December 2017 (UTC)