Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sikh diaspora/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Per consensus, substantial issues with GA criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
GA from 2007. Would like to have some people take a look at the article as the article has numerous citation needed tags and may contain original research because "The paragraphs about the Khalistan movement and Sikh identity make a lot of unsourced and unverified claims, many of which may be incorrect." Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke
- I agree that Sikh diaspora should not be featured as a Good article. Upon having a look, it contains content with no verifiable sources provided - an immediate disqualification.
- Overall, I believe this article should be rated as a C class - for its lack of verifiable information. Chilicave (talk) 02:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.