Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jainism/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Consensus is for delisting DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I think lot of problems have crept into this article since it was last reviewed. The position and placement of images seems quite messy now. The prose is also not clear. Sections such as Gunasthanas and Reception are not explained clearly. Also, there is undue weight given to the "Indus valley civilization" theory, which I do not think is a consensus among historians. I would like community opinion and review on whether this article still meets the Good Article criteria? Rahul (talk) 16:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I agree with the prose not being as clear, especially in later sections. I tried to clean up the Gunasthanas section and re-arranged some of the images to fit better with the text. The positive and negative criticism headings on the Reception section help. doctorrads (talk) 15:31, 28 April 2015 (EST)
Delist per above.
- 1a:
not fixed - 1b: not fixed
- 2a: not fixed
- 2b: not fixed
- 2c: not fixed
- 3a:
- 3b:
- 4: not fixed
- 5:
- 6a:
- 6b: not fixed
- 7:Fails most GA criteriaTomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 19:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Would it be a good idea to revert the page to an earlier version? --Rahul (talk) 10:11, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Please Elaborate
[edit]At least highlight the sections that you think contain issues. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs) 20:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)