Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tsūjun Bridge

Tsūjun Bridge

Reason: A beautiful, crisp picture of the largest stone aqueduct in Japan.
Articles this image appears in: Tsūjun Bridge
Creator: creator: Masamic, editor: Laitche

Support as nominator ----Torsodog^Talk 16:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Good picture, good subject for FP, however the shadown on the left is distracting - I can't think of how to take a better picture though, without chopping down the trees or taking on a sun-less day (which would worsen the colours)... So I'll support as prob best pic available, but weak support due to distracting shadows... Gazhiley (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The nominated version doesn't appear in any articles. The image in Tsūjun Bridge is a different crop. Spikebrennan (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, you're right. There were a few versions floating around and I messed up. I edited this nomination to include the CORRECT version. Sorry! --Torsodog^Talk 20:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is too much noise in the sky, and there are also darker circles up there too. (Perhaps the circles can be cloned out?) Overall, sharpness is lacking. It still has a decent composition, though. Spencer^{T♦Nominate!} 02:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well this is not my edit. Here is my edit version :) --Laitche (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Don't support this as it is, per Spencer's concerns and because of the reflection of the arch. It should (in my opinion) either be cut before the shape can be determined (as in Laitche's edit) or is it should continue to the extrados of the arch. This reflection is annoyingly not quite complete. Maedin\^talk 16:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but an edit that's sharpened but not cropped might be appealing. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 22:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I didn't want to crop. I just wanted to fix the counterclockwise tilte (or distortion). It cannot help... -- Laitche (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]