Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Temple Square, Salt Lake City, 1899

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2012 at 01:16:59 (UTC)

Support as nominator -- ■ MMXX ^talk 01:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Broken source link. Makeemlighter (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Updated, Thanks. ■ MMXX ^talk 01:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wow, I would have thought it was a painting. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that a photochrom is essentially a manually colored photo, so it's not so dissimilar from a painting. Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support As Crisco said, I would have thought it was a painting. Excellent quality! Dusty777 (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, def EV too. —Eustress ^talk 17:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support upstate NYer 16:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ has compression artifacts, especially visible in the sky. Pine^talk 10:40, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Doubtful given file size. I see a bit of noise, but no artefacts. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 17:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - There were some marks in the sky, not artifacts for sure. how is it now? ■ MMXX ^talk 00:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Maybe noise is the better word. Whatever it is, it still doesn't look quite right. I may be being too picky given the age of this photo. Perhaps what I'm seeing is in the original, so I'll change my vote to neutral. Pine^talk 09:38, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support – like it. Nik thestoned 14:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Temple Square, Salt Lake City, 1899 retouched.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]