Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pond in Winter

Reason: It is a picture that adds significantly to the article, as well as being a good picture alone.
Articles this image appears in: Pond
Creator: User:Juliancolton

Support as nominator Juliancolton (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical quality isn't perfect, but that's not my first issue. It doesn't show a pond as much as it shows a tangle of snow-covered brush. I think there are better pictures out there to illustrate this article. Clegs (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Yeah, it doesn't really show the pond. Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have another version that shows more of the pond. Juliancolton (talk) 22:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above (not encyclopedic for the article for which it is submitted). Spikebrennan (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Upload the other, Julian, and let's see that one. Clegs (talk) 04:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- framing of the shot could be a lot better. - Longhair\^talk 22:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok, I will upload the other one. Juliancolton (talk) 16:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose both - low technical quality. You need a better camera for an FP picture in this category.--Svetovid (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The weather was cloudy and foggy that day, so that could be the reason it doesn't look good. Juliancolton (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose both The image isnt sharp at full size. Although the first picture is marginally better in quality neither are good enough for FPSeddon69 (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 02:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]