Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hera
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2010 at 22:08:52 (UTC)
- Reason
- Compelling and professional quality portrait of an eyecatching and notable individual from a notable photographer, released under a free license. The EV is particularly high, because it shows off the "facial art" for which the subject is known. Caption nabbed from the article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Hera Hjartardóttir
- FP category for this image
- People/Entertainment
- Creator
- Kyle Cassidy
- Support as nominator --J Milburn (talk) 22:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support. High quality and striking portrait, excellent EV. When I saw this appear in the article, I thought it should be nominated, so I'm glad to see it here already. --Avenue (talk) 01:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Maybe missed the focus a little, but not a deal breaker. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom --Muhammad(talk) 11:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support per Muhammad. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely striking shot with high encyclopedic and very high quality. Cat-five - talk 05:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- This snowballing support is a bit surprising. For commons this is perfect, but here, I am not sure that the composition is really the best. Would it be possible to have a crop without 20% of the right side? Nergaal (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- Support but I prefer the crop. — Jeff G. ツ 19:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- I think I prefer the original, to be honest. Much nicer looking. J Milburn (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also, you appear to have fiddled the lighting; was that deliberate? As an aside, I am reminded of this nomination, in which the more interesting composition was featured. J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, that was not deliberate. All I did with Paint.NET was crop to 1393x1331 and save at 95% quality. Would another quality setting be better in this case? — Jeff G. ツ 19:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Also, you appear to have fiddled the lighting; was that deliberate? As an aside, I am reminded of this nomination, in which the more interesting composition was featured. J Milburn (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- I think I prefer the original, to be honest. Much nicer looking. J Milburn (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- I think the current crop is too tight. It kills the composition. Try only half of the crop you did (also, save at 100%). Nergaal (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Or perhaps not tight enough. It does make the composition unbalanced, but cropping the other side might fix that. --Avenue (talk) 01:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done, 1700px with 100% quality. — Jeff G. ツ 05:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Which version is preferred? Jujutacular talk 16:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Original. J Milburn (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Original Aaadddaaammm (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Original. --Avenue (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
- Note: The original has been replaced in the article by the cropped version. --Avenue (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Hera-photo-by-kyle-cassidy.jpg --Jujutacular talk 09:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)