Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Nuclear power by country/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by User:Sephiroth BCR 23:05, 3 November 2008 [1].
Notified: WP:ENERGY, User:JWB, User:Beagel, User:Smurrayinchester.
Since being promoted in 2006, this list doesn't appear to have been kept up to date. Every reference is from 2005 or 2006, and there is even a "This article or section needs to be updated." AMBOX, and more than half the cells in the table are empty. The criteria has been revised since 2006 and I feel it now fails to meet FL requirements, in particular
- Cr. 2 -- Lead section -- It fails to follow WP:LEAD, in particular WP:BOLDTITLE, and what's with the context box placed in the middle of the lead?
- Cr. 3 -- Comprehensiveness, with the missing information.
Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 21:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The external link mentioned in the article has some of the information required to update the list but the file format crashes my browser. Rmhermen (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, the Status column is very poorly sourced. For example, we need sources on the 'considering decommissioning', among others. Also, since the table is sortable, the World row should be an unsorted row. --Golbez (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per above comments -- just not up to scratch at this stage. Many of the figures shown in the Table do not agree with the main source given: [2]Johnfos (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per above comments. In addition, the map added to the article is incorrect about some countries. I think that this article should deal only with existing/under construction reactors and all speculations about new possible reactors or decommissioning should be removed.Beagel (talk) 19:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above comments, and since no effort has been made to fix the article. iMatthew 23:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.