Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Spice Girls discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:31, 27 May 2010 [1].
Spice Girls discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Mister sparky (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because over the past couple of months I have done alot of work on improving sourcing, formatting, content etc for the article and think it's of very high quality. There has also been a peer review and the suggestions have been actioned. Mister sparky (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments.
Can you use a uniform format for large numbers? For instance: "UK: 3,000,000[1] US: 10 million[1] World: 23 million[1]". Write "3 million" instead of 3,000,000.- forgot about that one. Mister sparky (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you putting a full stop after incomplete sentences? For instance: "Promotional song for the launch of Channel 5 in the UK.". No full stop is necessary here.- good point. Mister sparky (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The tables mention featured artist and promotional songs. They should be also mentioned in the leading section.- FL discogs don't usually mention promo and featured songs in the lead, thats why I left them off. Mister sparky (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik_Zero 19:37, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I do see any further problems with this list. Ruslik_Zero 17:24, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- thank you! :) Mister sparky (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have a couple of comments, but this is good enough for me to support. Well done.
- thank you! :) Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Shouldn't you introduce the band members in the lead? As it stands, only Haliwell is named, and only because she quit the group.
- added. Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Like in The Libertines discography, include a note explaining what those dashes in the Singles table are supposed to mean.
- forgot about that! added. Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope you can mix up the prose in the lead a bit more, as you use a few phrases repetitively. For eg: That first paragraph alone contains the word 'sell' five times, 'album' is there 16 times (mix it up with the name of the album). Also, 'global success' shouldn't be there twice.
- done some re-jigging. Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You devote far too many words for that debut album (esp "Wannabe") as compared to the rest of their releases.
- also jigged the info a bit. Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Considering that all the chart positions are obviously referenced in the body of the article, you don't need to reference them in the lead too.—indopug (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- in every flc i've worked on previously they do have to be sourced in the lead. unless things have changed recently? Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support, as long as you find a cat number with an RS. Good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - a DVD entitled "Spice Girls Greatest Hits" is used as a reference, but does not appear in the "video albums" section - any reason for this omission.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- the dvd is a bonus disc with the greatest hits album, added the format to the compilation table, which i forgot previously. Mister sparky (talk) 13:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support now that that's cleared up -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.