Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Seinfeld (season 2)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Scorpion0422 00:02, 15 February 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I believe this list meets criteria and follow the same style as similar FLs. --Gman124 talk 02:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support - problems resolved to meet WP:WIAFL.--TRUCO 22:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - one of the rules for WP:FAC is that the same editor may not nominate more than one article at a time. I am unsure if the same rule applies here but if so then this nomination should be closed until the nomination for Seinfeld (season 1) is concluded. Might want to check with an FL wrangler. Otto4711 (talk) 18:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Not at WP:FLC, users usually are usually able to nominate up to 3, since lists are less complex to review and is a less complex process as opposed to FAC.--TRUCO 22:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have asked the FL director, Scorpion0422, and he says he has no problem with more than one nomination by the same editor. Gman124 talk 14:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is usually fair that for each FLC nominated, the nominator should review another in return. Gman124 seems to have done that, so it is all fair and well. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have asked the FL director, Scorpion0422, and he says he has no problem with more than one nomination by the same editor. Gman124 talk 14:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not at WP:FLC, users usually are usually able to nominate up to 3, since lists are less complex to review and is a less complex process as opposed to FAC.--TRUCO 22:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) The writing in this article is better, but it is still not at FL quality yet. If I feel up to it, I might do some copy-editing myself. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "start on January 16, 1991. Its premiere "-->start on January 16, 1991. However, its premiere
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "It comprised
of12 episodes "
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "This season received"-->Season two received
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "thirteen years" Numbers over nine should be written in numerals.
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "This season was directed " Same as two bullets above. The "this" back-reference is often a bit confusing, better to refer to the noun directly.
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- " Barney Martin replaced Phil Bruns as Jerry's Father
starting this season." Understood from larger context.
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "and caused NBC to put the show on hiatus"-->causing NBC to put the show on hiatus
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "after
justfour weeks"
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "thirteen episode order" Compound adjective, should be "thirteen-episode order"
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "rings with truth and familiarity, as well as laughter and just plain silliness." Logical punctuation (WP:PUNC), period should be outside the quotation marks.
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "The episodes "The Pony Remark" You are only talking about one episode here, why "The episodes"?
- "
The episode"The Deal" wasalso" Understood by now that you are talking about episodes.
- Done --Gman124 talk 23:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "George comes to Jerry complaining about his girlfriend Marlene"-->George complains to Jerry about his girlfriend Marlene
- Done --Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "George takes Jerry's advice and breaks off their relationship" Not clear who "their" is.
- Done --Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "George insists Jerry see Marlene to get back some books" Repetition of "insists" is a bit annoying. Insert "that" after "insists". Is there a better word than "get back"? (rhetorical question)
- Done How about if I use regain or reover--Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Jerry suddenly finds himself in a relationship with Marlene." Not possible. Clarify.
- Done Changed the sentence a little bit--Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "However, after seeing his act," Which act? Don't leave readers in the dark.
- Done --Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Those are most of the issues from the lead through the first episode summary. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Further down: "a starving Elaine mentions that she is so hungry that she would eat food off of another patrons plate" Spot the two redundant consecutive words.
- Done I think it's fixed now. --Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "They question her as she walked away, losing the wager." So they lose the wager as they question her? Dabomb87 (talk) 19:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Elaine looses the wager. --Gman124 talk 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.