Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Encanto (film)/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 May 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Encanto (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Encanto (film)/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Encanto (film)/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Pamzeis (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Encanto is... well, you probably already know. It's huge... oh, whatever! Just read my previous nom statement! OK, so since the previous nomination, Encanto has won an Oscar and a lot more awards. Now, there's only one award left, which will be announced in... five months. I personally don't see it as much of a problem since the Hugos seem to mostly be well-documented in RSes and, really, it's only one or two sources that'll change. Hopefully, this one'll pass! Pinging previous participants: ChrisTheDude, AryKun, The Rambling Man and Bilorv. Pamzeis (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Can't see any changes from last time that would make me change my mind. Although should "$228 million" be put in inflation templates (I know it released only a year ago, but future-proofing or something). AryKun (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source review by Bilorv
[edit]I'm happy that my previous oppose reason (stability) no longer applies. Thanks for the ping and I've enjoyed doing a source review on this list. All ref numbers as of Special:Permalink/1082471235.
- No issues with the reliability of any sources—I had a look at the NextBestPicture and Cinema Daily US websites and journalists (previously unfamiliar to me) and am satisfied that each is reliable for the claim they are cited for.
- Link Variety in ref #23.
Spotchecks on refs #2, #5–6, #23, #29–30, #33–35:
- "Premiered at the El Capitan Theatre in Los Angeles on November 3, 2021, the film was released theatrically in the United States and Canada on November 24 for a limited 30-day run due to the COVID-19 pandemic" – I can't see that either Variety or Box Office Mojo verifies this in full (the latter just says it debuted in some places on November 24).
- Ref #23 doesn't say that it was Lin-Manuel Miranda who received the nomination (just the song "Dos Oruguitas").
- Ref #30 doesn't say that it was Germaine Franco who received the nomination.
Thanks for your work so far—the sources are good and the reference section and list are excellently formatted. I see no issues with the prose. Once the above are resolved, please check for any other issues with name credits missing from references to the awards, as I'll be doing more specific spotchecks on these in a second round. — Bilorv (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bilorv: Done Chompy Ace 08:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, all my issues are resolved and more spotchecks turned up no other problems, so I'm happy to support on sourcing. — Bilorv (talk) 19:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bilorv: Done Chompy Ace 08:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- There's not much to change, but: If the row header cell spans multiple rows (e.g. has
rowspan=3
or whatever), then use!scope=rowgroup
instead of!scope=row
. - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 00:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I got nothing :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support my concerns have been addressed. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review – The lone image in the article has an appropriate free license. It would be nice if it had alt text, but FAC hasn't required it for many years, so I don't feel comfortable mandating it before calling this review a pass, which I'm doing now. Please consider adding it, though, as accessibility is very important. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Giants2008: Done. Pamzeis (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.