Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Music Bank Chart winners (2017)/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2017)

[edit]

List of Music Bank Chart winners (2017) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): EN-Jungwon (talk) and Jal11497 (talk) 16:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 5th article from the music bank series winners that I am nominating at FLC. As always, any feedback is very much appreciated. -- EN-Jungwon 16:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
*""Plz Don't Be Sad" earned boy group Highlight their first Music Bank award since leaving Cube Entertainment and re-debuting with Around Us Entertainment under their rebranded name." - source? Also a bit odd to refer to their "rebranded name" with no explanation
  • Added source. Would ""Plz Don't Be Sad" earned boy group Highlight (formerly Beast) their first Music Bank award since leaving Cube Entertainment and re-debuting with Around Us Entertainment." be better?
    That would work for me :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In April, girl group Laboum achieved their first music show award with "Hwi Hwi" from their second mini album." - source?
    Done
  • "Boy group Wanna One achieved their first number one on Music Bank with their debut single "Energetic"and" - there's a space missing between two words. Also the "and" should probably be "which"
    Done
  • "Yoon achieved his first number one over 27 years after debut" => "Yoon achieved his first number one over 27 years after his debut"
    Done
  • "their first ever music show trophies for "Pretend," "A Daily Song" and "Like It," respectively." => "their first ever music show trophies for "Pretend", "A Daily Song" and "Like It" respectively."
    Done
  • "Epik High (pictured) won Music Bank for the first time for "Love Story."" => "Epik High (pictured) won Music Bank for the first time for "Love Story"."
    Done
  • Think that's it -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • All done. Thanks again. -- EN-Jungwon 08:12, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by PanagiotisZois

[edit]
Resolved comments from PanagiotisZois (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
# Regarding the first two sentences of the lede, which of the sources support these claims?
  1. Citation added.
  2. Regarding "Plz Don't Be Sad", so that there's a better flow of continuity with the previous sentence, I'd probably place it staying in 1st place for 3 weeks first.
    Merged with another sentence
    1. Concerning this, given that the infobox points out how 3 separate songs came in 1st place 3 times, this should probably be mentioned in the lede concerning "Signal".
    I have merged those into one sentence.
  3. Link girl / boy group the first time.
    Done.
    1. Link Twice in lede.
    Done.
  4. Add semicolon after "Heart Shaker".
    Done
  5. Random question, but has Music Bank provided details on how their methodology works? They seem to be taking a variety of things into account for the scores. Like, what exactly does "album sales (5%)" mean? That they take into account the (digital or physical) sales of the albums into account, obtain the 5% from said number, and add that up with the rest?

Overall, a somewhat interesting read (although I'm not very into music) and well structured page. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PanagiotisZois, regarding the details of the methodology. Music Bank is a bit different from other music shows. The highest possible score is 200,000 points (10,000 - 11,000 on other shows). For album sales, 5% of 200,000 points are reserved (10,000 points). The score for album sales is calculated using market share of that album sales in a week. For example let say album1 sold 1,000 copies, album2 sold 500, album3 250, album4 100. The total number of sales would be 1850. album1 would get 5405 points as it takes up 54.05%of the market share. album2 would get 2703 points for 27.03%. album3 1351 13.51%. album4 540 5.41%. -- EN-Jungwon 15:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All right, thank you for making the aforementioned changes. I made a few more of my own in the lede. Let me know if you find them acceptable. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 11:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PanagiotisZois looks good I made a minor edit. Other than that I found no issues. Thanks. -- EN-Jungwon 13:29, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All right then, looking at the page's prose, I can support this candidate's promotion. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

[edit]
  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • The license on File:SECHSKIES Eighteen Preview.jpg needs checking (I can't read Korean).
  • Checking the FLC criteria:
  • 1. I've skimmed the prose and made minor edits; nothing big jumps out at me. Feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all nonnumeric sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine, except as above. (Some reviewers will say that alt text is missing; some won't, since the captions cover what normally appears in alt text. The question is above my pay grade.)
  • 6. It is stable.
  • Close enough for a support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 23:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • You might be interested in reviewing WP:Featured list candidates/List of COM-clade families/archive1 or (when this link turns blue) WP:Featured list candidates/List of malvid families/archive1. - Dank (push to talk) 00:34, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dank, I have replaced the image and added alt text to all the images. Thanks for the review. -- EN-Jungwon 02:13, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 18:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Music_Bank_Chart_winners_(2017)/archive1&oldid=1153896204"