Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of COM-clade families/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of COM-clade families (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): - Dank (push to talk) 21:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Incas chewing coca leaves, tapioca, pansies, and a plant that's 80,000 years old ... what else could you ask for in a plant list? Comments are welcome. Basic licensing information for the images is on the list talk page. The sidebar at the upper right of the list page will help you look for other lists in this series, if that helps. Comments are welcome. We're almost done with the series. - Dank (push to talk) 21:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - couldn't find anything to quibble about :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks much for looking. - Dank (push to talk) 12:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
[edit]- Agree with Chris, everything is in good order. Another solid work on this series. Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Very happy to see that you've been so active at FLC lately. - Dank (push to talk) 19:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
EN-Jungwon
[edit]- I recommend linking to the author's article in the references. Other than that I don't see any major issues with this list. -- EN-Jungwon 13:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done in this edit. Thanks for reviewing. - Dank (push to talk) 14:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- EN-Jungwon 14:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Chompy Ace
[edit]- No issues there. Support for an excellent work! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 00:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure thing. - Dank (push to talk) 02:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – The reliability and formatting of the references both look good across the board, and no dead links were identified by the link-checker. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:41, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 14:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.