Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of M*A*S*H episodes/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:35, 14 June 2010 [1].
List of M*A*S*H episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jimknut (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because M*A*S*H is generally acknowledged to be an important television series as well as a popular one. It therefore warrants an excellent episode list. I believe that all of the featured list criteria has been met and would now like to see the article moved up to featured list status. Jimknut (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments (wow, you scared them off alright!!)
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support The Rambling Man (talk) 15:17, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Currently, my only problem with the list is that all of the dates throughout the list use the 'Month Day, Year' format, but the references at the bottom use the 'Day Month Year' format. Consistency would be nice, preferably in the 'Month Day, Year' format since it is an article about an American program. --Another Believer (Talk) 23:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- MOS says consistency within the article and consistency within the refs, but not necessarily consistency across both. However, to save someone a dull job, I've script-changed the ref dates to be mdy throughout, hope Jimknut doesn't mind and hope Another Believer can revisit to show support or other comments. Cool. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, Rambling Man, I don't mind at all! Thanks. Jimknut (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the assistance, The Rambling Man. While I do not conduct FLC assessments often, my concern has been resolved and the list looks good to me so I'd like to offer my support assuming the concerns of other reviewers have also been addressed. --Another Believer (Talk) 17:07, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, Rambling Man, I don't mind at all! Thanks. Jimknut (talk) 16:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Mostly a very good list, I just have one irk: You use ETZ for the timeslots when it should probably just be ET. I'd prefer EST but I know that's not technically right; change it and I'll support. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed ETZ to ET. Jimknut (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.