Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dallas Landmarks/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 22:54, 20 January 2010 [1].
- Nominator(s): Dfwcre8tive (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because the new list was created to highlight Landmark structures and districts in Dallas that were previously not mentioned. I created the list to better categorize and distinguish Dallas Landmarks from other historic designations. Dfwcre8tive (talk) 19:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Transcluded Dabomb87 (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments - suggest this is withdrawn and reintroduced when, as a minimum, the following is fixed:
- All references should use the {{cite web}} template, or similar, not just be bare URLs.
- The lead is expanded appropriately. One short paragraph is insufficient for a list with this many entries.
- The table is fixed (and probably made sortable) - look at line 2 (starts Structure...)
- Images need alt text.
- Disambiguation links need to be fixed.
The Rambling Man (talk) 14:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Is there a reason why some of the words in the "Current Use" column are in italics?
- The "Designation Date", "Current Use", "NRHP Date" and "RTHL Date" look incomplete, is there a reason as to why there are so many empty columns?
- Redlinks seem to be overused.
Afro (Not a Talk Page) - Afkatk 08:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - I'm going to oppose this article as no effort has seemed to be made to improve this article at all since December 29, the only addition to this article has been a bot. Afro (Not a Terrible Joke) - Afkatk 10:29, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.