Wikipedia:Featured article review/Susi Kentikian/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was kept by Casliber via FACBot (talk) 9:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: WikiProject Boxing, WikiProject Women's sport
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because (copying my comments from article's talk page): This article has a few issues that should be addressed if it's to keep its FA status. It's fairly obvious it's been neglected over the past few years. The FA nominator, EnemyOfTheState, hasn't edited in nearly four years, and no one appears to have picked up the slack.
- Mainly, there are statements that need citations; the 2013, 2014, and "Other activities" sections are all unsourced. There are also a few other statements elsewhere that need sources.
- There's no prose concerning her career in 2015 and 2016.
- The most recent information that is there is very poorly written, making it obvious that it was added by drive-by editors. Per FA criteria, prose should be engaging. "On [date], she defeated [person]. On [date], she defeated [person], etc." is definitely not engaging.
- Sections containing a scant amount of info should be merged into other sections.
- The "Highlights" and "Awards" sections each contain bulleted lists of only three items; these would be better presented as prose.
The "Other activities" section contains a diacritic being used as an apostrophe (trivial, but it highlights how neglected this article has been).Lizard (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – I cleaned up a couple of the things pointed out above and will try to add updates on her recent fights as time allows. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include referencing, prose, and need for updating. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The article has been updated with her post-FAC fights and those updates have been sourced. I'll try to do a prose run-through if time allows. Giants2008 (Talk) 17:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Just wanted to let everyone know that I've done some copy-editing work on the article, in addition to fixing the issues raised at the start of the FAR. Hopefully this is moving towards keep territory. Giants2008 (Talk) 13:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The comments in the review section have been addressed. Images are appropriately used and licensed. DrKay (talk) 10:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep My issues are resolved. Looks like recent info on her is scarce, so I suppose this is about as good as we can hope for, unless Giants2008 can dig up something more to add. Lizard (talk) 18:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:21, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.