Wikipedia:Featured article review/Salsa music/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Dana boomer 18:29, 15 January 2011 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]Salsa music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this featured article for review because of the failure of 1c. In the lead, the article is tagged with a {{Original research}} tag. Also, I see unreferenced parts all over the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Featured article criteria of concern mentioned in the FAR section include original research and referencing. Dana boomer (talk) 13:36, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - As per my comments in my review weren't addressed. GamerPro64 (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist nothing's happening. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:25, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Agree with the concerns per above by GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) and TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs). Above those issues are not addressed. JJ98 (Talk) 07:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What exactly are the concerns here? The OR tag came as a result of an anon adding unreferenced information to the article. The nominator has not brought specfic areas of concern either here on in the article's talk page. Please enumerate sentences or paragraphs which are in need of attention. Joelito (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The OR tag needs to be fixed and/or removed and the same done for any unreferenced information the IP added that has not already been taken care of. FARs are not closed as successful on articles that still have major cleanup banners. Please feel free to ping the editors commenting above if they do not reply here within a couple of days. Dana boomer (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Joel, were you planning to work on this article, or just making a general comment? If you were planning to work on it, I'll hold the review open a bit longer... Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't planning on working on the article. I was making a general comment on the information that a nominator should be required to provide when opening a FAR. Joelito (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.