Wikipedia:Featured article review/National Anthem of Russia/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:19, 25 June 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notified: Zscout370, Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs
I think this article no longer meets criteria 1a, 1c and 2c. Prose is sometimes a bit choppy. It needs citations in some sentences, and use a apropriate citation format. I'm not sure if the length is the desirable. Could use copyedit/review for flow and check for comprehensiveness. Thanks, OboeCrack (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright status of some of the clips is uncertain. DrKiernan (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The primary editor seems to have left the project. 1a and 2c could be fixed but 1c would be difficult without specialized research. OboeCrack, can we have some ideas about the 1c objection? I mean, does something in particular stand out or are you aware of sources that haven't been consulted? I note that this was promoted over strong 1a and 1c objections.--Laser brain (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Examples of lack missing info would be good
- Some info, as the one Putin telling the soccer players to not chew gum should removed due to no encyclpedical material. One source to add relevant info: Robert Service - Russia: Experiment with a People Chapter 13. OboeCrack (talk) 02:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, prose. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 04:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist unsourced quote; citation needed. DrKiernan (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.